Integrative data analysis in clinical psychology research

Annual Review of Clinical Psychology

Volumn 9, Issue , 2013, Pages 61-89

  Hussong, Andrea M ^a   Curran, Patrick J ^a   Bauer, Daniel J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

collaborative science; cumulative science; data sharing; measurement harmonization; pooled data analysis; research methods

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ALCOHOLISM; ANXIETY; CALIBRATION; CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; DATA ANALYSIS; DEPRESSION; EXTERNAL VALIDITY; FUNCTIONAL DISEASE; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INTEGRATIVE DATA ANALYSIS; INTERNAL VALIDITY; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MEASUREMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; SAMPLING; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL STATUS; STUDY DESIGN; SUBSTANCE ABUSE;

HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 84875889078     PISSN: 15485943     EISSN: 15485951     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185522     Document Type: Review

References (70)

1. Achenbach TM, Edelbrock CS. 1981. Behavioral problems and competencies reported by parents of normal and disturbed children aged four through sixteen. Monogr. Soc. Res. Child Dev. 46:1-822
2. Am. Psychol. Assoc. 2002. Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Am. Psychol. 57:1060-733
3. Bauer DJ, Hussong AM. 2009. Psychometric approaches for developing commensurate measures across independent studies: Traditional and new models. Psychol. Methods 14:101-255
4. Bur. Labor Stat., U.S. Dep. Labor. 2002. National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 Cohort, 1979-2002 (Rounds 1-20) [data file]. Columbus, OH: CVent. Hum. Resour. Res., Ohio State Univ
5. Byrne BM, Shavelson RJ, Muth́en B. 1989. Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychol. Bull. 105:456-666
6. Chassin L, Rogosch F, Barrera M. 1991. Substance use and symptomatology among adolescent children of alcoholics. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 100:449-633
7. Cheung GW, Rensvold RB. 1998. Cross-cultural comparisons using non-invariant measurement items. Appl. Behav. Sci. Rev. 6:93-1100
8. CochranWG. 1977. Sampling Techniques. New York:Wiley. 3rd e.d.
9. Cooper HM. 2010. Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis: A Step-by-Step Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
10. Cooper H, Hedges LV, Valentine JC, eds. 2009. The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis. New York: Sage Found
11. Curran PJ, Bauer DM. 2011. The disaggregation of within-person and between-person effects in longitudinal models of change. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 62:583-6199
12. Curran PJ, Hussong AM. 2009. Integrative data analysis: The simultaneous analysis of multiple data sets. Psychol. Methods. 14:81-1000
13. Derogatis LR, Spencer PM. 1982. The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI): Administration, and Procedures Manual-I. Baltimore, MD: CVlin. Psychometr. Res
14. DeRubeis RJ, Gelfand LA, Tang TZ, Simons AD. 1999. Medications versus cognitive behavior therapy for severely depressed outpatients: Mega-Analysis of four randomized comparisons. Am. J. Psychiatry 156:1007-133
15. Fisher RA. 1922. On the mathematical foundations of theoretical statistics. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 222:309-688
16. Gibbons RD, Brown CH, Hur K,Davis JM,Mann J. 2012. Suicidal thoughts and behavior with antidepressant treatment: Reanalysis of the randomized placebo-controlled studies of fluoxetine and venlafaxine. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 69:580-877
17. Harris KM, Halpern CT, Entzel P, Tabor J, Bearman PS, Udry Jr. 2008. The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health: Study Design. Chapel Hill, NC: UNC Carol. Popul. Cent. http://www.cpc.unc.edu/ projects/addhealth/design
18. Hirsch Hadorn G, Hoffmann-Riem H, Biber-Klemm S, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Joye D, et al. 2008. The emergence of transdisciplinarity as a form of research. In Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research, e.d. G Hirsh Hadorn, H Hoffman-Riem, S Biber-Klemm, W Grossenbacher-Mansuy, D Joye, C Pohl, U Weismann, E Zemp, pp. 19-39. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springerr
19. Holland PW. 2007. A framework and history for score linking. In Linking and Aligning Scores and Scales, e.d. NJ Dorans, M Pommerich, PWHolland, pp. 5-30. New York: Springerr
20. Holland PW, Dorans NJ. 2006. Linking and equating. In EducationalMeasurement, ed. RL Brennan, pp. 187-220. Westport, CT: Am. Counc. Educ./Praeger. 4th e.d.
21. Holland PW, Wainer H. 1993. Differential Item Functioning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaumm
22. Hunter DJ, Spiegelman D, Adami H, Beeson L, van den Brandt PA, et al. 1996. Cohort studies of fat intake and the risk of breast cancer-A pooled analysis. N. Engl. J. Med. 334:356-611
23. Hussong AM,Cai L, Curran PJ, FloraDB, ChassinLA, ZuckerRA. 2008a.Disaggregating the distal, proximal, and time-varying effects of parent alcoholism on children's internalizing symptoms. J. Abnorm. Child. Psychol. 36:335-466
24. Hussong AM, Flora DB, Curran PJ, Chassin LA, Zucker RA. 2008b. Defining risk heterogeneity for internalizing symptoms among children of alcoholic parents: A prospective cross-study analysis. Dev. Psychopathol. 20:165-933
25. Hussong AM, Huang WJ, Curran PJ, Chassin L, Zucker RA. 2010. Parent alcoholism impacts the severity and timing of children's externalizing symptoms. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 38:367-800
26. Hussong AM,HuangW,Serrano D, Curran PJ, ChassinL. 2012. Testingwhether andwhen parent alcoholism uniquely affects various forms of adolescent substance use. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 40(8):1265-766
27. Hussong AM, Wirth RJ, Edwards MC, Curran PJ, Chassin LA, Zucker RA. 2007. Externalizing symptoms among children of alcoholic parents: Entry points for an antisocial pathway to alcoholism. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 116:529-422
28. Ioannidis JPA, Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG, Lau J. 1999. Recursive cumulative meta-Analysis: A diagnostic for the evolution of total randomized evidence from group and individual patient data. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 52:281-911
29. Kaplow JB, Curran PJ, Dodge KA, Conduct Probl. Prev. Res. Group. 2002. Child, parent, and peer predictors of early-onset substance use: A multisite longitudinal study. J. Abnorm. Child. Psychol. 30:199-2166
30. Lenhard J. 2006. Models and statistical inference: The controversy between Fisher and Neyman-Pearson. Br. J. Philos. Sci. 57:69-911
31. Lerer B, Segman RH, Fangerau H, Daly AK, Basile VS, et al. 2002. Pharmacogenetics of tardive dyskinesia: CVombined analysis of 780 patients supports association with dopamine D3 receptor gene Ser9Gly polymorphism. Neuropsychopharmacology 27:105-200
32. Lorenz FO, Simons RL, Conger RD, Elder GR, Johnson C, Chao W. 1997. Married and recently divorced mothers' stressful events and distress: Tracing change across time. J. Marriage Fam. 59:219-322
33. Mailman MD, Feolo M, Jin Y, KimuraM, Tryka K, et al. 2007. The NCBI dbGaP database of genotypes and phenotypes. Nat. Genet. 39:1181-866
34. McArdle JJ, Hamagami F, Meredith W, Bradway KP. 2000. Modeling the dynamic hypotheses of Gf-Gc theory using longitudinal life-span data. Learn. Individ. Differ. 12:53-799
35. McArdle JJ, Prescott CA, Hamagami F, Horn JL. 1998. A contemporary method for developmental-genetic analyses of age changes in intellectual abilities. Dev. Neuropsychol. 14:69-1144
36. Meade AW, Michels LC, Lautenschlager GL. 2007. Are internet and paper-And-pencil personality tests truly comparableörgan. Res. Methods 10:322-455
37. Meehl PE. 1978. Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 46:806-344
38. Meredith W. 1993. Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika 58:525-433
39. Millsap RE, Meredith W. 2007. Factorial invariance: Historical perspectives and new problems. In Factor Analysis at 100: Historical Developments and Future Directions, ed. R Cudeck, RC MacCallum, pp. 131-52. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaumm
40. MischelW. 2008. Connecting clinical practice to scientific progress. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 9:i-ii
41. MischelW. 2009. From personality and assessment 1968 to personality science, 2009. J. Res. Personal. 43:282-900
42. Natl. Database Autism Res. 2011. National Database for Autism Research. Bethesda, MD: Natl. Inst. Mental Health, Natl. Inst. Health. http://ndar.nih.gov
43. Natl. Inst. Drug Abuse. 2010. Accelerating the Pace of Drug Abuse Research Using Existing Epidemiology, Prevention, and Treatment Research Data (R01). Bethesda, MD: Natl. Inst. Health. http://grants. nih.gov/grants/guide/pa- files/PAR-10-018.html
44. Natl. Inst. Drug Abuse. 2012. Clinical Trials Network (CTN). Bethesda, MD: Natl. Inst. Drug Abuse. http://www.drugabuse.gov/about-nida/organization/ cctn/ctn
45. Natl. Inst. Child Health Human Dev. 2010. Systems-Oriented Pediatric Obesity Research and Training (SPORT) Center of Excellence (U54) (RFA-HD-10-001). Bethesda, MD:Natl. Inst.Health. http://grants. nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-HD-10-001.html
46. Natl. Inst. Health. 2003. Final NIH Statement on Sharing Research Data. Bethesda, MD: Natl. Inst. Health. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice- files/NOT-OD-03-032.html
47. Natl. Sci. Found. 2011. Dissemination and Sharing of Research Results. Arlington, VA: Natl. Sci. Found. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/ nsf11001/aag-6.jsp#VID4
48. Neyman J. 1934. On the two different aspects of the representative method: The method of stratified sampling and the method of purposive selection. J. R. Stat. Soc. 97:558-6066
49. Northwest. Univ. Feinberg Sch. Med. 2012. Collaborative Data Synthesis for Adolescent Depression Trials. Chicago, IL: Dep. Prev. Med.,Northwest. Univ. Feinberg Sch. Med. http://www.preventivemedicine. northwestern.edu/research/ collab-data-Adolescent-depression.html?t=vD1
50. Pfeffermann D. 1993. The role of sampling weights when modeling survey data. Int. Stat. Rev. 61:317-377
51. Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS. 2002. Hierarchical Linear Models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 2nd e.d.
52. Reise SP, Waller N. 2009. Item response theory and clinical measurement. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 5:27-488
53. Reise SP, Widaman KF, Pugh RH. 1993. Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. Psychol. Bull. 114:552-666
54. RichmanWL, Kiesler S,Weisband S, Drasgow F. 1999. A meta-Analytic study of social desirability distortion in computer-Administered questionnaires, traditional questionnaires, and interviews. J. Appl. Psychol. 84:754-755
55. Rivers DC, Meade AW, FullerWL. 2009. Examining question and context effects in organization survey data using item response theory. Organ. Res. Methods 12:529-333
56. Schaeffer NC. 1988. An application of item response theory to the measurement of depression. In Sociological Methodology, vol. 18, ed. CC Clogg, pp. 271-307. Washington, DC: Am. Sociol. Assoc
57. Schmidt FL. 1996. Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for training of researchers. Psychol. Methods 1:115-299
58. Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT. 2002. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflinn
59. Sher KJ, Walitzer KS, Wood PK, Brent EE. 1991. Characteristics of children of alcoholics: Putative risk factors, substance use and abuse, and psychopathology. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 100:427-488
60. Stark LJ, JanickeDM, McGrath AM, Mackner LM, Hommel KA, LovellD. 2005. Prevention of osteoporosis: A randomized clinical trial to increase calcium intake in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. J. Pediatr. Psychol. 30:377-866
61. Steenkamp JEM, Baumgartner H. 1998. Assessing measurement invariance in cross national consumer research. J. Consum. Res. 25:78-900
62. Steinberg L, Thissen D. 2006. Using effect sizes for research reporting: Examples using item response theory to analyze differential item functioning. Psychol. Methods 11:402-155
63. Sterba SK. 2009. Alternative model-based and design-based frameworks for inference from samples to populations: From polarization to integration. Multivar. Behav. Res. 44:711-400
64. Takane Y, de Leeuw J. 1987.Onthe relationship between item response theory and factor analysis of discretized variables. Psychometrika 52:393-4088
65. Tourangeau R, Rips LJ, Rasinski K. 2000. The Psychology of Survey Response. New York: CVambridge Univ. Presss
66. VandenbergRJ, LanceCE. 2000.A review and synthesis of themeasurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organ. Res. Methods 3:4-699
67. van den Brandt PA, Spiegelman D, Yaun S, Adami H, Beeson L, et al. 2000. Pooled analysis of prospective cohort studies on height, weight, and breast cancer risk. Am. J. Epidemiol. 152:514-277
68. Widaman KF, Reise SP. 1997. Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In The Science of Prevention: Methodological Advances from Alcohol and Substance Abuse Research, ed. KJ Bryant, M Windle, SG West, pp. 281-324. Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc
69. Yoon M, Millsap RE. 2007. Detecting violations of factorial invariance using data-based specification searches: A Monte Carlo study. Struct. Equ. Modeling 14:435-633
70. Zucker RA, Fitzgerald H, Refior S, Puttler L, Pallas D, Ellis D. 2000. The clinical and social ecology of childhood for children of alcoholics: Description of a study and implications for a differentiated social policy. In Children of Addiction: Research, Health, and Policy Issues, ed. H Fitzgerald, B Lester, B Zuckerman, pp. 109-41. New York: Routledge Falmerr