An algorithmic approach for breakage-fusion-bridge detection in tumor genomes

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 110, Issue 14, 2013, Pages 5546-5551

  Zakov, Shay ^a   Kinsella, Marcus ^a   Bafna, Vineet ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioinformatics; Cancer genomics; Combinatorial pattern matching; Gene amplification

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BREAKAGE FUSION BRIDGE; CANCER GENOMICS; COPY NUMBER VARIATION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; GENOMICS; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PANCREAS CANCER; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DNA COPY NUMBER VARIATIONS; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; MODELS, GENETIC; NEOPLASMS; SISTER CHROMATID EXCHANGE;

EID: 84875871987     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1220977110     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA (2011) Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell 144(5):646-674.
2. Hastings PJ, Lupski JR, Rosenberg SM, Ira G (2009) Mechanisms of change in gene copy number. Nat Rev Genet 10(8):551-564.
3. Carr AM, Paek AL, Weinert T (2011) DNA replication: Failures and inverted fusions. Semin Cell Dev Biol 22(8):866-874.
4. McClintock B (1941) The Stability of broken ends of chromosomes in Zea Mays. Genetics 26(2):234-282.
5. DePinho RA, Polyak K (2004) Cancer chromosomes in crisis. Nat Genet 36(9):932-934.
6. Bignell GR, et al. (2007) Architectures of somatic genomic rearrangement in human cancer amplicons at sequence-level resolution. Genome Res 17(9):1296-1303.
7. Kitada K, Yamasaki T (2008) The complicated copy number alterations in chromosome 7 of a lung cancer cell line is explained by a model based on repeated breakagefusion-bridge cycles. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 185(1):11-19.
8. Hillmer AM, et al. (2011) Comprehensive long-span paired-end-tag mapping reveals characteristic patterns of structural variations in epithelial cancer genomes. Genome Res 21(5):665-675.
9. Lim G, et al. (2005) An integrated mBAND and submegabase resolution tiling set (SMRT) CGH array analysis of focal amplification, microdeletions, and ladder structures consistent with breakage-fusion-bridge cycle events in osteosarcoma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 42(4):392-403.
10. Hicks J, et al. (2006) Novel patterns of genome rearrangement and their association with survival in breast cancer. Genome Res 16(12):1465-1479.
11. Selvarajah S, et al. (2008) Genomic signatures of chromosomal instability and osteosarcoma progression detected by high resolution array CGH and interphase FISH. Cytogenet Genome Res 122(1):5-15.
12. Kinsella M, Bafna V (2012) Combinatorics of the breakage-fusion-bridge mechanism. J Comput Biol 19(6):662-678.
13. Bignell GR, et al. (2010) Signatures of mutation and selection in the cancer genome. Nature 463(7283):893-898.
14. Campbell PJ, et al. (2010) The patterns and dynamics of genomic instability in metastatic pancreatic cancer. Nature 467(7319):1109-1113.
15. Carter NP (2007) Methods and strategies for analyzing copy number variation using DNA microarrays. Nat Genet 39(7, Suppl):S16-S21.
16. Chiang DY, et al. (2009) High-resolution mapping of copy-number alterations with massively parallel sequencing. Nat Methods 6(1):99-103.
17. Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg SL (2009) Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol 10(3):R25.
18. Miller CA, Hampton O, Coarfa C, Milosavljevic A (2011) ReadDepth: a parallel R package for detecting copy number alterations from short sequencing reads. PLoS ONE 6(1):e16327.