Environmental correlates of cycling: Evaluating urban form and location effects based on Danish micro-data

Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment

Volumn 22, Issue , 2013, Pages 40-

  Nielsen, Thomas Alexander Sick ^a   Olafsson, Anton S ^b   Carstensen, Trine A ^b   Skov Petersen, Hans ^b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Active travel; Bikeability; Cycling policy; Urban neighbourhood design; Walkability

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; TRANSPORTATION;

ACTIVE TRAVEL; BIKEABILITY; ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES; ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATORS; HIGH PROBABILITY; LEVEL OF SERVICE; PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION; WALKABILITY;

URBAN TRANSPORTATION;

ACCESSIBILITY; CYCLE TRANSPORT; NEIGHBORHOOD; PUBLIC TRANSPORT; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR; URBAN DESIGN; URBAN TRANSPORT; WALKING;

DENMARK;

EID: 84875869437     PISSN: 13619209     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2013.02.017     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Alonso W. Location and Land Use. Toward A General Theory of Land Rent 1964, Harvard University Press.
2. Boarnet M., Crane R. Travel by Design 2001, Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York.
3. Christiansen, H., Haunstrup, B., 2011. The Danish National Travel Survey - Declaration of Variables, TU 2006-2010, Version 2. Technical University of Denmark, DTU Transport, Kgs. Lyngby.
4. Daugbjerg P., Hansen K.V. Ejendomsdata 2000, Kort og Matrikelstyrelsen, Copenhagen.
5. Erhvervsstyrelsen, 2012. Det Centrale Virksomhedsregister. CVR(accessed 10.05.12). http://www.cvr.dk.
6. Ermisch J.F., Wright R.E. Interpretation of negative sample selection effects in wage offer equations. Applied Economics Letters 1994, 1:187-189.
7. European Environment Agency CORINE Land Cover a Key Database for European Integrated Environmental Assessment 1999, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.
8. Ewing R., Cervero R. Travel and the built environment. a meta-analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association 2010, 76:265-294.
9. Forsyth A., Krizek K. Urban design: is there a distinctive view from the bicycle?. Journal of Urban Design 2011, 16:531-549.
10. Handy S., Cao X., Mokhtarian P.L. Self-selection in the relationship between the built environment and walking. Journal of The American Planning Association 2006, 72:55-74.
11. Heckmann J.J. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 1979, 47:153-161.
12. Jensen C. Danskernes transport - hvor meget, hvordan og hvornår? 2009, Trafikdage på Aalborg Universitet, Aalborg.
13. National survey and cadastre, 2012. Denmark 1:10.000, Kort 10, (accessed 10.05.12). http://www.kms.dk/Produktkatalog/Topografiske+data/Vektordata/Kort10.htm.
14. Pucher J., Buehler R. Making cycling irresistible: lessons from the Netherlands, Denmark and Germany. Transport Reviews 2008, 28:495-528.
15. Rietveld P., Daniel V. Determinants of bicycle use: do municipal policies matter?. Transportation Research Part A 2004, 531-550.
16. Statistics Denmark, 2012. Kvadratnet. Data Presentation. (accessed 10.05.12). http://www.dst.dk/da/TilSalg/produkter/geodata/kvadratnet.aspx.