Indexing cognitive workload based on pupillary response under luminance and emotional changes

International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Proceedings IUI

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 247-256

  Wang, Weihong ^a   Li, Zhidong ^a   Wang, Yang ^a   Chen, Fang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cognitive workload; Feature extraction; Machine learning; Pupillary response

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE INTERFACE; COGNITIVE WORKLOADS; DESIGN AND EVALUATIONS; FEATURE SELECTION AND CLASSIFICATION; HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION RESEARCHES; LUMINANCE CONDITIONS; PHYSIOLOGICAL INDICES; PUPILLARY RESPONSE;

FEATURE EXTRACTION; LEARNING SYSTEMS; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS;

PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY;

EID: 84875854117     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2449396.2449428     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Beatty, J. Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. Psychological bulletin 91, 2 (1982), 276.
2. Bradley, M., Miccoli, L., Escrig, M., and Lang, P. The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation. Psychophysiology 45, 4 (2008), 602-607.
3. Cain, B. A review of the mental workload literature. Tech. rep., Defence Research and Development, Canada Toronto, 2007.
4. Chen, S., Epps, J., Ruiz, N., and Chen, F. Eye activity as a measure of human mental effort in hci. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, ACM (2011), 315-318.
5. Chui, C. An introduction to wavelets, vol. 1. Academic Pr, 1992.
6. Farmer E, B. A. Review of workload measurement, analysis and interpretation methods. Tech. rep., European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation, 2003.
7. Freund, Y. Boosting a weak learning algorithm by majority. Information and computation 121, 2 (1995), 256-285.
8. Freund, Y., and Schapire, R. A desicion-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. In Computational learning theory (1995), 23-37.
9. Iqbal, S., Adamczyk, P., Zheng, X., and Bailey, B. Towards an index of opportunity: understanding changes in mental workload during task execution. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, vol. 2, Citeseer (2005), 311-320.
10. Iqbal, S., Zheng, X., and Bailey, B. Task-evoked pupillary response to mental workload in human-computer interaction. In CHI'04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (2004), 1477-1480.
11. Klingner, J., Kumar, R., and Hanrahan, P. Measuring the task-evoked pupillary response with a remote eye tracker. In Proceedings of ETRA (2008), 69-72.
12. Kramer, A. Physiological metrics of mental workload: A review of recent progress. Multiple-task performance (1991), 279-328.
13. Lang, P., Bradley, M., and Cuthbert, B. International affective picture system: Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Tech. rep., University of Florida, 2005.
14. LimaU, C., Rennieb, C., Barryc, R., Bahramalib, H., Lazzarob, I., Manorb, B., and Gordonb, E. Decomposing skin conductance into tonic and phasic components. International Journal of Psychophysiology 25 (1997), 97-109.
15. Marshall, S. The index of cognitive activity: Measuring cognitive workload. In Human factors and power plants, 2002. proceedings of the 2002 IEEE 7th conference on, IEEE (2002), 7-5.
16. McEwen, B., and Sapolsky, R. Stress and cognitive function. Current opinion in neurobiology 5, 2 (1995), 205-216.
17. Miller, L., and Shmavonian, B. Replicability of two gsr indices as a function of stress and cognitive activity. Journal of personality and social psychology 2, 5 (1965), 753.
18. Paas, F., Tuovinen, J., Tabbers, H., and Van Gerven, P. Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational psychologist 38, 1 (2003), 63-71.
19. Palinko, O., Kun, A., Shyrokov, A., and Heeman, P. Estimating cognitive load using remote eye tracking in a driving simulator. In Proceedings of the 2010 Symposium on Eye-Tracking Research & Applications, ACM (2010), 141-144.
20. Partala, T., and Surakka, V. Pupil size variation as an indication of affective processing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59, 1 (2003), 185-198.
21. Pomplun, M., and Sunkara, S. Pupil dilation as an indicator of cognitive workload in human-computer interaction. In Proceedings of the International Conference on HCI (2003).
22. Schapire, R. The strength of weak learnability. Machine learning 5, 2 (1990), 197-227.
23. Schapire, R., Freund, Y., Bartlett, P., and Lee, W. Boosting the margin: A new explanation for the effectiveness of voting methods. The annals of statistics 26, 5 (1998), 1651-1686.
24. Setz, C., Arnrich, B., Schumm, J., La Marca, R., Troster, G., and Ehlert, U. Discriminating stress from cognitive load using a wearable eda device. Information Technology in Biomedicine, IEEE Transactions on 14, 2 (2010), 410-417.
25. Shi, Y., Ruiz, N., Taib, R., Choi, E., and Chen, F. Galvanic skin response (gsr) as an index of cognitive load. In CHI'07 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (2007), 2651-2656.
26. Stanners, R., Coulter, M., Sweet, A., and Murphy, P. The pupillary response as an indicator of arousal and cognition. Motivation and Emotion 3, 4 (1979), 319-340.
27. Wilson, G. F. Operator functional state assessment. Tech. rep., Research and Technology Organisation, North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, 2004.
28. Xu, J., Wang, Y., Chen, F., and Choi, E. Pupillary response based cognitive workload measurement under luminance changes. Human-Computer Interaction-INTERACT 2011 (2011), 178-185.
29. Xu, J., Wang, Y., Chen, F., Choi, H., Li, G., Chen, S., and Hussain, S. Pupillary response based cognitive workload index under luminance and emotional changes. In Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (2011), 1627-1632.