Voice activity detection via noise reducing using non-negative sparse coding

IEEE Signal Processing Letters

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 475-478

  Teng, Peng ^a   Jia, Yunde ^a  

^a BEIJING INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Conditional random fields; noise reducing; non negative sparse coding; voice activity detection

Indexed keywords

CONDITIONAL RANDOM FIELD; CORRELATION BETWEEN FEATURES; DETECTION PERFORMANCE; LOW SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; NOISE REDUCING; NON-NEGATIVE SPARSE CODING; ORIGINAL AUDIO SIGNAL; VOICE ACTIVITY DETECTION;

FEATURE EXTRACTION; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; RANDOM PROCESSES; SPEECH RECOGNITION;

SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO;

EID: 84875828442     PISSN: 10709908     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/LSP.2013.2252615     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. J. Sohn,N. Kim, andW. Sung, "A statistical model-based voice activity detection," IEEE Signal Process. Lett., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1-3, 1999.
2. Y. Cho, K. Al-Naimi, and A. Kondoz, "Improved voice activity detection based on a smoothed statistical likelihood ratio," in Proc. Int. Conf. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2001, vol. 2, pp. 737-740. (Pubitemid 32839026)
3. J.Ramírez, J. Segura, J.Górriz, and L.García, "Improved voice activity detection using contextualmultiple hypothesis testing for robust speech recognition," IEEE Trans. Audio, Speech, Lang. Process., vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 2177-2189, 2007.
4. Y. Suh and H. Kim, "Multiple acoustic model-based discriminative likelihood ratio weighting for voice activity detection," IEEE Signal Process. Lett., vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 507-510, 2012.
5. A. Saito, Y. Nankaku, A. Lee, and K. Tokuda, "Voice activity detection based on conditional random fields using multiple features," in Proc. Interspeech, 2010, pp. 2086-2089.
6. J.Wu and X. Zhang, "Efficient multiple kernel support vector machine based voice activity detection," IEEE Signal Process. Lett., vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 466-469, 2011.
7. D. You, J. Han, G. Zheng, andT.Zheng, "Sparse power spectrumbased robust voice activity detector," in Proc. Int. Conf. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2012, pp. 289-292.
8. J. Lafferty, A. McCallum, and F. Pereira, "Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data," in Proc. Int. Conf. Machine Learning, 2001, pp. 282-289.
9. P. Hoyer, "Non-negative sparse coding," in Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Neural Networks for Signal Processing, 2002, pp. 557-565, IEEE.
10. J.Mairal, F. Bach, J. Ponce, andG. Sapiro, "Online learning for matrix factorization and sparse coding," J. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 11, pp. 19-60, 2010.
11. K. W. Wilson, B. Raj, P. Smaragdis, and A. Divakaran, "Speech denoising using nonnegative matrix factorization with priors," in Proc. Int. Conf. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2008, pp. 4029-4032.
12. J. Garofolo, L. Lamel, W. Fisher, J. Fiscus, D. Pallett, and N. Dahlgren, "DARPA TIMIT acoustic-phonetic continous speech corpus CD-ROM," in NIST, 1993.
13. [Online]. Available: http://spib.rice.edu/spib/select-noise.htmlR. University, NOISEX-92 Database, [Online.] Available:
14. H.-G. Hirsch, FaNT: Filtering and Noise Adding Tool [Online]. Available: http://aurora.hsnr.de