Relationships between mechanically induced hydrodynamics and membrane fouling in a novel rotating membrane bioreactor

Desalination and Water Treatment

Volumn 51, Issue 13-15, 2013, Pages 2850-2861

  Jiang, Tao ^a   Zhang, Hanmin ^a   Yang, Fenglin ^a   Gao, Dawen ^b   Du, Hai ^a  

^a DALIAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b HARBIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Hydrodynamics; Membrane bioreactor (MBR); Membrane fouling; Particle image velocimetry (PIV)

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875821023     PISSN: 19443994     EISSN: 19443986     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2012.750794     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. S. Judd, The MBR Book: Principles and Applications of Membrane Bioreactors for Water and Wastewater Treatment, Elsevier, Oxford, 2006.
2. H.F. Zhang, B.S. Sun, X.H. Zhao, J.M. Sun, Membrane foulingcaused by soluble microbial products in an activated sludgesystem under starvation, Desalin. Water Treat. 1 (2009) 180-185.
3. Z.W. Wang, Z.C. Wu, G.P. Yu, H.F. Liu, Z. Zhou, Relationship between sludge characteristics and membraneflux determination in submerged membrane bioreactors, J.Membr. Sci. 284 (2006) 87-94.
4. N. Engelhardt, W. Firk, W. Warnken, Integration of membranefiltration into the activated sludge process in municipalwastewater treatment, Water Sci. Technol. 38 (1998) 429-436.
5. F.G. Meng, S.R. Chae, A. Drews, M. Kraume, H.S. Shin, F.L. Yang, Recent advances in membrane bioreactors (MBRs):membrane fouling and membrane material, Water Res. 43(2009) 1489-1512.
6. Z. Wang, Y. Cui, J. Yao, J. Chu, Y. Liang, The influence ofvarious operating conditions on specific cake resistance in thecrossflow microfiltration of yeast suspensions, Desalin. WaterTreat. 1 (2009) 237-247.
7. H. Prieske, A. Drews, M. Kraume, Prediction of the circulationvelocity in a membrane bioreactor, Desalination 231(2008) 219-226.
8. L. Ji, J.T. Zhou, Influence of aeration on microbial polymersand membrane fouling in submerged membrane bioreactors,J. Membr. Sci. 276 (2006) 168-177.
9. J.S. Park, K.M. Yeon, C.H. Lee, Hydrodynamics and microbialphysiology affecting performance of a new MBR, membranecoupledhigh-performance compact reactor, Desalination 172(2005) 181-188.
10. M.Y. Jaffrin, Dynamic shear-enhanced membrane filtration: areview of rotating disks, rotating membranes and vibratingsystems, J. Membr. Sci. 324 (2008) 7-25.
11. J. Luo, L.H. Ding, Influence of pH on treatment of dairywastewater by nanofiltration using shear-enhanced filtrationsystem, Desalination 278 (2011) 150-156.
12. S. Ahmed, M.G. Rasul, M.A. Hasib, Y. Watanabe, Performanceof nanofiltration membrane in a vibrating module(VSEP-NF) for arsenic removal, Desalination 252 (2010) 127-134.
13. S.C. Low, H.H. Juan, L.K. Siong, A combined VSEP andmembrane bioreactor system, Desalination 183 (2005)353-362.
14. R. Bouzerar, P. Paullier, M.Y. Jaffrin, Concentration of mineralsuspensions and industrial effluents using a rotating diskdynamic filtration module, Desalination 158 (2003) 79-85.
15. K. Takata, K. Yamamoto, R. Bian, Y. Watanabe, Removal ofhumic substances with vibratory shear enhanced processingmembrane filtration, Desalination 117 (1998) 273-282.
16. D.Y. Zuo, H.J. Li, H.T. Liu, G.P. Wu, A study on submergedrotating MBR for wastewater treatment and membrane cleaning, Korean J. Chem. Eng. 27 (2010) 881-885.
17. N.G. Deen, B.H. Hjertager, Particle image velocimetry measurementsin an aerated stirred tank, Chem. Eng. Commun.189 (2002) 1208-1221.
18. X.A. Mao, A.J. Jaworski, Application of particle image velocimetrymeasurement techniques to study turbulence characteristicsof oscillatory flows around parallel-plate structuresin thermoacoustic devices, Meas. Sci. Technol. 21 (2010) 1-16.
19. M. Raffel, C.E. Willert, S.T. Wereley, J. Kompenhans, ParticleImage Velocimetry: A Practical Guide, second ed.,Springer, Berlin, 2007.
20. S.J. Lee, C.W. Park, J.H. Kang, Daichin Evaluation of windenvironment around a residential complex using a PIV velocityfield measurement technique, Environ. Fluid Mech. 9(2009) 655-668.
21. L. Martinelli, C. Guigui, A. Line, Characterisation of hydrodynamicsinduced by air injection related to membrane foulingbehavior, Desalination 250 (2010) 587-591.
22. APHA (American Public Health Association), Standard Methodsfor the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 19th ed.,New York, USA, 1995.
23. O. Al-akoum, M. Mercier-Bonin, L. Ding, C. Fonade, P. Aptel, M. Jaffrin, Comparison of three different systems used forflux enhancement: application to crossflow filtration of yeastsuspensions, Desalination 147 (2002) 31-36.
24. J. Ní Mhurchú, G. Foley, Dead-end filtration of yeast suspensions:correlating specific resistance and flux data using artificialneural networks, J. Membr. Sci. 281(1-2) (2006) 325-333.
25. G.L. Geernaert, S.E. Larsen, F. Hansen, Measurements of the wind stress, heat flux, and turbulence intensity during storm conditions over the North Sea, J. Geophys. Res. 92(12) (1987) 13127-13139.
26. R.K. Kundu, I.M. Cohen, Fluid Mechanics, second ed.,Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 2002.
27. A. Brookes, B. Jefferson, S.J. Judd, Sub-critical fouling in amembrane bioreactor: impact of flux and MLSS, in: Proc.IWA 4th Word Water Congress, Marrakech, 2004.
28. P.S.A. Yeo, W.K.A. Law, A.G. Fane, Factors affecting theperformance of a submerged hollow fiber bundle, J. Membr.Sci. 280 (2006) 969-982.