What happened to body-to-body sociability?

Social Science Research

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 893-905

  Fortunati, Leopoldina ^a   Taipale, Sakari ^b   Luca, Federico de ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UDINE   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Body to body; Communication; EU5; Forms of sociability; ICT; Media; Sociability

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875810569     PISSN: 0049089X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.12.006     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Amirou R. Sociability/sociality. Current Sociology 1989, 37(1):115-120.
2. Backer E. VFR travel: an examination of the expenditures of VFR travellers and their hosts. Current Issues in Tourism 2007, 10(4):366-377.
3. Benjamin W. Paris: capital of the nineteenth century. Metropolis: Centre and Symbol of Our Times 1995, 77-88. New York University Press, New York. P. Kasinitz (Ed.).
4. Bouglé C. Vie Spirituelle et Action Sociale 1902, é. Cornély, Paris.
5. Bourdieu P. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste 1984, Trans. by Richard Nice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
6. Bourdieu P. Sport and social class. Rethinking Popular Culture. Contemporary Perspectives in Cultural Studies 1991, 357-373. University of California Press, Berkeley. C. Mukerji, M. Schudson (Eds.).
7. Bourdieu P. Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action 1998, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
8. Campbell S.W., Kwak N. Mobile communication and civic life: linking patterns of use to civic and political engagement. Journal of Communication 2010, 60(3):536-555.
9. Coleman J.S. Foundations of Social Theory 1990, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
10. Craveri B. The Age of Conversation 2005, New York Review of Books, New York.
11. De Certeau M. The Practice of Everyday Life. Trans. Steven Rendall 1985, University of California Press, Berkeley.
12. Debenedetti S. Investigating the role of companions in the art museum experience. International Journal of Arts Management 2003, 5(3):52-63.
13. DiMaggio O., Hargittai E., Neuman W.R., Robinson J. Social implication of the Internet. Annual Review of Sociology 2001, 27:307-336.
14. European Environmental Agency, 2009. Ensuring Quality of life in Europe's Cities and Towns. EEA Report No. 5/2009. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
15. Featherstone M. The Flâneur, the city and virtual public life. Urban Studies 1998, 35(5-6):909-925.
16. Ferguson A. An Essay on the History of Civil Society 1995, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
17. Finkelstein, J., 1989. Dining Out: A Sociology of Modern Manners. Polity, Cambridge.
18. Fischer C.S. Made in America: A Social History of American Culture and Character 2010, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
19. Forsé M. Quelques éléments sur la sociabilité, thèse de troisième cycle de sociologie 1980, Institut d'études politiques de Paris, Paris.
20. Fortunati, L., 1981. L'arcano della riproduzione. Casalinghe, Prostitute, operaie e capitale. Marsilio: Venezia. (English Trans. 1995, The Arcane of Reproduction. Housework, Prostitution, Labour and Capital. New York: Autonomedia).
21. Fortunati L. Is body-to-body communication still the prototype?. The Information Society 2005, 21(1):1-9.
22. Fortunati L., Taipale S. Organization of the social sphere and typology of the residential setting in Europe: how sociability affects the adoption of the mobile phone in rural and urban locations. Technology in Society 2012, 34(1):33-43.
23. Fortunati, L., Deuze, M., de Luca, F., forthcoming. The New about News: How Print, Online, Free and Mobile co-constructed new audiences in Italy, France, Spain, the UK and Germany, the Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication.
24. Fukuyama F. The Great Disruption. Human Nature and the Reconstitution of Social Order 1999, Profile Books, London.
25. Gemelli, G., Malatesta, M., 1982. Forme di sociabilità nella storiografia francese contemporanea. Feltrinelli, Milan.
26. Giddens, A., 2006. Sociology. Polity, Cambridge.
27. Goffman E. Relations in Public: Micro Studies of the Public Order 1971, Basic Books, New York.
28. Gurvitch, G., 1938. Les formes de la sociabilité. In: Essais de Sociologie. Sirey, Paris.
29. Halbwachs M. L'évolution des Besoins dans les Classes Ouvrières [The Evolution of Needs in the Working Classes] 1933, Alcan, Paris.
30. Hampton K.N., Wellman B. Examining community in the digital neighbourhood: Early results from Canada's wired suburb. Digital Cities: Technologies, Experiences, and Future Perspectives 2000, 475-492. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. T. Ishida, K. Isbister (Eds.).
31. Hirschi T. Causes of Delinquency 1969, University of California Press, Berkeley.
32. Hochschild A.R. The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling 1983, University of California Press, Berkeley.
33. Jakobson, R., 1960. Closing Statements: Linguistics and Poetics, Style in Language. Sebeok, New York.
34. Kant, I., 1784/2010. Idea of a universal history with a cosmopolitan purpose of view. In: Brown, G., Held, D. (Eds.), The Cosmopolitanism Reader. Polity Press, Cambridge, pp. 17-26.
35. Katz J.E., Rice R.E. Social Consequences of Internet Use: Access, Involvement, and Interaction 2002, MIT Press, Cambridge.
36. Kraut R., Patterson M., Lundmark V., Kiesler S., Mukhopadhyay T., Scherlis W. Internet paradox: a social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?. American Psychologist 1998, 53(9):1017-1031.
37. Kraut R., Kiesler S., Boneva B., Cummings J., Helgeson V., Crawford A. Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues 2002, 58(1):49-74.
38. Krohn M.D., Massey J.L. Social control and delinquent behavior: an examination of the elements of the social bond. The Sociological Quarterly 1980, 2(1):529-543.
39. Lehtonen T.-K., Mäenpää P. Shopping in the East Centre Mall. The Shopping Experience 1997, Sage, London. P. Falk, C. Campbell (Eds.).
40. Ling R. The Mobile Connection: The Cell Phone's Impact on Society 2004, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco.
41. Ling R. New Tech, New Ties: How Mobile Communication is Reshaping Social Cohesion 2008, MIT Press, Cambridge.
42. McPherson M., Smith-Lovin L., Brashears M.E. Social isolation in America: changes in core discussion networks over two decades. American Sociological Review 2006, 71(3):353-375.
43. Melnick M.J. Searching for sociability in the stands: a theory of sports spectating. Journal of Sport Management 1993, 7(1):44-60.
44. Nie N., Erbing L. Internet and society: a preliminary report. IT and Society 2000, 1(1):275-283.
45. Nie N.H., Hillygus D.S. The impact of internet use on sociability: time-diary findings. IT & Society 2002, 1(1):1-20.
46. Nie N., Hillygus D., Erbing L. Internet use, interpersonal relations, and sociability: a time diary study. The Internet in Everyday Life 2002, 215-243. Blackwell, Malden. B. Wellman, C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.).
47. Putnam R.D. Bowling Alone 2000, Simon and Schuster, New York.
48. Rainie L., Wellman B. Networked: The New Social Operating System 2012, MIT Press, Cambridge.
49. Rice R. Primary issues in Internet use: access, civic and community involvement, and social interaction and expression. Handbook of New Media 2002, 105-129. Sage, London. L. Lievrouw, S. Livingstone (Eds.).
50. Rice R., Shepherd A., Dutton W.H., Katz J.E. Social interaction and the Internet: a comparative analysis of surveys in the US and Britain. Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology 2007, 7-30. Oxford University Press, Oxford. A. Joinson, K. McKenna, T. Postmes, U.-D. Reips (Eds.).
51. Riesman D. Abundance for What? 1993, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick.
52. Schleiermacher F.D.E. Theory of Sociable Conduct and Essays in its Intellectual-Cultural Context. Trans. by R.D. Richardson 1995, Edwin Mellen Press, Lewiston.
53. Simmel G. The sociology of sociability. American Journal of Sociology 1910/1949, 55(3):254-261.
54. Sugiyama S., Katz J.E. Social conduct, social capital and the mobile phone in the US and Japan: a preliminary exploration via student surveys. Mobile Democracy: Essays on Society, Self and Politics 2003, 375-385. Passagen Verlag, Vienna. K. Nyiri (Ed.).
55. Taipale, S., Oinas, T., Salminen, V.-M. (forthcoming). Internet use and informal help for surrounding communities in Finland.
56. Tarde, G., 1893, La logique sociale des sentiments. Revue Philosophique XXXVI, pp. 561-594.
57. Tarde, G., 1899. L'opinion et la conversation. L'opinion, I. Revue de Paris, 5 août, pp. 689-719.
58. Turkle S. Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other 2011, Basic Books, New York.
59. Uslaner E.M. Social capital, television, and the 'mean world': trust, optimism, and civic participation. Political Psychology 1998, 19(3):441-467.
60. Warde A., Martens L. Eating Out: Social Differentiation, Consumption and Pleasure 2000, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
61. Wellman B. Physical place and cyberplace. The rise of personalized networking. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 2001, 25(2):227-252.
62. The Internet in Everyday Life 2002, Blackwell Publisher, Oxford. B. Wellman, C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.).
63. Wellman B., Quan-Haase A., Witte J., Hampton K. Does the Internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation, and community commitment. American Behavioral Scientist 2001, 45(3):436-455.
64. Wellman B., Boase J., Chen W. The networked nature of community: online and offline. IT and Society 2002, 1(1):151-165.
65. Zhao S. Do Internet users have more social ties? A call for differentiated analyses of Internet use. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2006, 11(3):844-862.