Is Body-to-body communication still the prototype?

Information Society

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 53-61

  Fortunati, Leopoldina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UDINE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Artificial; Communicative act; Copresence; Face to face communication; Mediated communication; Prototype; The human body

Indexed keywords

EID: 11344272277     PISSN: 01972243     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01972240590895919     Document Type: Article

References (105)

1. Airenti, Gabriella, Bara, Bruno G., and Colombetti, Marco. 1993. Con-versation and behavior games in the pragmatics of dialogue. Cogni-tive Science 17(2):197-256.
2. Allwood, Jens, and Andersson, Lars-Gunnar. 1976. Semantik. Report from the Department of Linguistics. Göteborg: University of Göteborg.
3. Anderson, B., and Tracey, Karina. 2001. Digital living: The impact (or otherwise) of the Internet on everyday life. American Behavioral Scientist 45(3):456-475.
4. Argyle, Michael, and Dean, Janet. 1965. Eye-contact distance and affiliation. Sociometry XXVIII:289-304.
5. Austin, John L. 1962. How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Baldini, Massimo. 1995. Storia della comunicazione. Roma: Newton Compton.
7. Barthes, Roland. 1957. Mythologies. Paris: Seuil.
8. Barker, David. 1988. "It's been real": Forms of television representation. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 5:42-45.
9. Baudrillard, Jean. 1999. L'Echange impossible. Paris: Editions Galilée.
10. Berger, Peter L., and Luckmann, Thomas. 1966. The social construction of reality. New York: Doubleday.
11. Cappella, Joseph N. 1981. Mutual influence in expressive behavior: Adult-adult and infant-adult dyadic interaction. Psychological Bulletin 89:101-132.
12. Carletta, Jean, Isard, Amy, Isard, Stephen, Kowtko, Jacqueline, Doherty-Sneddon, Gwyneth, and Andersen, Anne. 1997. The reliability of a dialogue structure coding scheme. Computational Linguistics 23(1):13-31.
13. Ciampa, John A. 1989. Communication: The living end. New York: Philosophical Library.
14. Cicourel, Aaron V. 1980. Language and social interaction: Philosophical and empirical issues. Working Paper, 96a. Università degli Studi di Urbino.
15. Contarello, Alberta. 2003. Body to body: Copresence in communication. In Mediating the human body. Technology, communication, and fashion, eds. L. Fortunati, K. Katz, and R. Riccini, pp. 123-132. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
16. Contarello, Alberta, Fortunati, Leopoldina, Fernandez, Pedro Gomez, Mante, Enid, Versinskaya, Olga, and Volovici, Daniel. 2003. Social representations of ICTs and the human body. A comparative study in five countries. In The good, the bad and the irrelevant: The user and the future of information and communication technologies, eds. L. Haddon et al., pp. 56-62. Helsinki: Media Lab UIAH.
17. Daft, Richard L., and Lengel, Robert H. 1984. Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design. In Research in organizational behavior, vol. 6, eds. L. L. Cummings and B. M. Staw, pp. 191-233. Homewood: IL: JAI Press.
18. Dalla Costa, Mariarosa and Dalla Costa, Giovanna F. 1995. Paying the price: Women and the politics of international economic strategy. New York: Zed Books.
19. Dalla Costa, Mariarosa and James, Selma. 1972. The power of women and the subversion of the community. Bristol: Falling Wall Press.
20. DeFleur, Melvin, and Ball-Rokeach, Sadra J. 1989. Theories of mass communication. New York: Longman.
21. De Gournay, Chantai. 2002. Pretense of intimacy in France. In Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance, eds. J. Katz and M. Aakhus, pp. 193-205. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Dorr, Aimée, Graves, B. Sue, and Phelps, Edwin. 1980. Television literacy for young children. Journal of Communication 30(3):71-83.
23. Eco, Umberto. 1994. Sei passeggiate nei boschi narrativi. Milano: Bompiani.
24. Elliot, Williams, Rudd, Robert, and Good, L. 1983. Measuring perceived reality of television: Perceived plausability, perceived superficiality, and the degree of personal utility. Paper presented at the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication Annual Conference, Corvallis, OR.
25. Farr, Robert and Moscovici, Serge, eds. 1984. Social Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Federici, Silvia. 1999. Reproduction and feminist struggle in the new international division of labor. In Women, development and the labor of reproduction, eds. M. R. Dalla Costa and G. Dalla Costa, pp. 4782. Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press.
27. Festinger, Leon. 1957. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
28. Fischer, Claude S. 1992. America calling; A social history of the telephone to 1940. Berkeley: University of California Press.
29. Flichy, Patrice. 1991. Une histoire de la communication moderne. Paris : La Découverte.
30. Fortunati, Leopoldina. 1995a. The arcane of reproduction. New York: Autonomedia.
31. Fortunati, Leopoldina, ed. 1995b. Gli Italiani al telefono. Milano: Angeli.
32. Fortunati, Leopoldina, ed. 1998a. Telecomunicando in Europa. Milano: Angeli.
33. Fortunati, Leopoldina. 1998b. The ambiguous image of the mobile phone. In Communications on the move: The experience of mobile telephony in the 1990s, ed. L. Haddon, pp. 121-138. Telia: Stockholm.
34. Fortunati, Leopoldina. 2001. The mobile phone: An identity on the move. Personal and Ubiguitous Computing 5(2):85-98.
35. Fortunati, Leopoldina. 2002a. Italy. Stereotypes: True or false. In Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance, eds. J. Katz and M. Aakhus, pp. 42-62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Fortunati, Leopoldina. 2002b. The mobile phone: Towards new categories and social relations. Information, Communication & Society 5(4):513-528.
37. Fortunati, Leopoldina. 2003a.The human body: Natural and artificial technology. In Machines that become us, ed. J. Katz, pp. 71-87. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
38. Fortunati, Leopoldina. 2003b. Real people, artificial bodies. In Mediating the human body: Technology, communication and fashion, eds. L. Fortunati, J. Katz and R. Riccini, pp. 61-74. New Brunswick, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
39. Fortunati, Leopoldina. In press. Telephone and body-to-body communication: A comparison.
40. Fortunati, Leopoldina and Contarello, Alberta. 2002a. Internet-mobile convergence: Via similarity or complementarity? Trends in Communication 9:81-98.
41. Fortunati, Leopoldina and Contarello, Alberta. 2002b. Social representation of the mobile: An Italian study. In The social and cultural impact/meaning of mobile communication, pp. Doosan Resort, Chunchon, Korea.
42. Fortunati, Leopoldina and Manganelli, Anna Maria. 1995. Le telefonate in diretta. Vol. I La televisione; vol. II. La radio. Roma: Telecom Italia.
43. Fortunati, Leopoldina and Manganelli, Anna Maria. 1999a. La rappresentazione sociale delle telecomunicazioni. Roma: Telecom Italia.
44. Fortunati, Leopoldina and Manganelli, Anna Maria. 1999b. La competenza d'uso delle Nuove Tecnologie. Roma: Telecom Italia.
45. Fortunati, Leopoldina, De Luca, Roberto, and Fortunati, Guido. 1999. Cyber workers. In Usages & services des télécommunications à l'heure de Internet, 7-9 June 1999, pp. 420-428. Bordeaux: France Telecom.
46. Fortunati, L., Katz, J., and Riccini, R., eds. 2003. Mediating the human body: Technology, communication and fashion. New Brunswick, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
47. Franzen, Axel. 2000. Does the Internet make us lonely? European Sociological Review 16:427-438.
48. Freud, Sigmund. 1920. Beyond the pleasure principle. (Trans. into Italian, 1975, Al di là del principle del piacere. Torino: Boringhieri.
49. Gergen, Kenneth J. 1991. The satured self. New York: Basic Books.
50. Gergen, Kenneth J. 2002. The challenge of absent presence. In Perpetual contact. Mobile communication, private talk, public performance, eds. James Katz and Mark Aakhus, pp, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51. Gergen, Kenneth J. 2003. Self and community in the new floating worlds.In Mobile democracy. Essays on society, self and politics, ed. K. Nyiri, pp. Wien: Passagen.
52. Haddon, Leslie. 2003. Domestication and mobile telephony. In Machines that become us, ed. James E. Katz, pp. 43-56. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
53. Haddon, Leslie and Silverstone, Roger. 1996. Information and communication technologies and the young elderly. SPRU/CICT Report Series No. 13. Falmer: University of Sussex.
54. Hall, Stuart. 1989. Ideology and communication theory. In Rethinking communication theory, vol. l, eds. B. Dervin, L. Grossberg, B. O'Keefe, and E. Wartella, pp. 40-52. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
55. Haraway, Donna. 1991. Simians, cyborgs, and women. The reinvention of nature. New York, Routledge: Free Association Books,
56. Harper, Richard. 2003. Are mobiles good or bad for society? In Mobile democracy. Essays on society, self and politics, ed. K. Nyiri, pp. 185-214. Wien: Passagen.
57. Heidegger, Martin. 1959. Gelassenheit. Translated into Italian, 1983. L'abbandono. Genova: II Melangolo.
58. Heim, Michael. 1993. The metaphysics of virtual reality. New York: Oxford University Press.
59. Hopper, Robert. 1999. What do we know about telephone conversation? In Progress in communication sciences, vol. XV, Advances in telecommunications, eds. H. Sawhney and G. Barnett, pp. 29-44. Stamford, CT: Alex.
60. Jodelet, Denise. 1989. Les représentations Sociales. Paris: P.U.F.
61. Katz, James E., ed. 2003a. Machines that become us. New Brunswick: Transaction.
62. Katz, James E. 2003b. A nation of ghosts? Choreography of mobile communication in public spaces. In Mobile democracy. Essays on society, self and politics, ed. K. Nyiri, pp. 21-32. Wien: Passagen.
63. Kraut, Robert, et al. 1988. Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist 53(9): 1017-1031.
64. Lambert, Cédric. 1999. Nature et artifice: Essai sur quelques formes de leurs rapports dans la culture urbaine. Espaces et Sociétés "La Nature et l'Artifice" 99:105-122.
65. Latour, Bruno, and Woolgar, Steve. 1979. Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Los Angeles: Sage.
66. Levinson, Stephen C. 1979. Activity types. Linguistics 17:365-99.
67. Ling, Richard, Yttri, Birgitte, Anderson, Ben, and DiDuca, Deborah, 2003. Mobile communication and social capital in Europe. In Mobile democracy. Essays on society, self and politics, ed. K. Nyiri, pp. 359-374. Wien: Passagen.
68. Lorente, Santiago. 2004. Assessment of the virtual brotherhood hypothesis. Paper presented at the conference "Studiare il cambiamento sociale Problemi metodologici e strumenti per la ricerca empirica," AIS, Salerno, 28-29 January.
69. Maldonado, Tomás. 1992. Reale e Virtuale. Milano: Feltrinelli.
70. Maldonado, Tomás. 1997. Critica della ragione informatica. Milano: Feltrinelli.
71. Maldonado, Tomás. 1998. Ancora la tecnica. Un tour d'horizon. In Oggetti d'uso quotidiano. Rivoluzioni tecnologiche nella vita d'oggi, ed. M. Nacci. Venezia: Marsilio. http://www.eurescom.de/public/projects/P900-series/ p903/default.asp
72. Marvin, Carolyn. 1988. When old technologies were new: Thinking about electric communication in the late nineteenth century. New York: Oxford University Press.
73. Mehrabian, Albert. 1969. Significance of posture and position in the communication of attitude and status relationships. Psychological Bulletin 71:359-372.
74. Meyrowitz, Joshua. 1985. No sense of place. New York: Oxford University Press.
75. Meyrowitz, Joshua. 2003. Global nomads in the digital veldt. In Mobile democracy. Essays on society, self and politics, ed. K. Nyiri, pp. 91-102. Wien: Passagen.
76. Moliner, Pascal. 1993. Cingguestions à propos des representations sociales. Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale 20:5-14.
77. Moravia, Sergio. 1985. Dal monologo alla conversazione. Immagini della comunicazione umana nel pensiero contemporaneo. In La comunicazione umana, ed. U. Curi, pp. 41-66. Milano: Angeli.
78. Moscovici, Serge. 1961/76. La psychanalyse, son image et son public. Paris: P.U.F.
79. Moscovici, Serge. 1972. La société contre nature. Paris: UGE 10/18.
80. Oksman, Virpi and Rautiainen, Pirjo. 2003a. Extension of the hand: Children's and teennagers' relationship with the mobile phone in Finland. In Mediating the human body: Technology, communication and fashion, eds. L. Fortunati, J. Katz, and R. Riccini, pp. 103-112. New Brunswick, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
81. Oksman, Virpi, and Rautiainen, Pirjo. 2003a. "Perhaps it is a body part": How the mobile phone became an organic part of the everyday lives of Finnish children and teenagers. In Machines that become us, ed. J. Katz, pp. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
82. Ong, Walter, J. 1977. Interfaces of the word. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
83. Ong, Walter, J. 1982. Orality and literacy. The technologizing of the word. New York: Methuen.
84. Orletti, Franca, ed. 1983. Comunicare nella vita quotidiana. Bologna: II Mulino.
85. Palmer, Mark T. 1995. Interpersonal communication and virtual reality: Mediating interpersonal relationship. In Communication in the age of virtual reality, eds. F. Biocca and M. Levy, pp. 277-299. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
86. Patterson, Miles L. 1991. A functional approach to nonverbal exchange. In Fundamentals of nonverbal behaviour, eds. R. S. Feldman and B. Rimé, pp. 485-495. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
87. Piaget, Jean. 1974. Laformazione del simbolo nel bambino. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.
88. Piaget, Jean and Inhelder, Bärbel. 1970. La psicologia del bambino. Torino. Einaudi.
89. Potter, James W.I988. Perceived reality in television effects research. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 32(1)23-41.
90. Rafaeli, Sheizaf. 1988. Interactivity: From new media to communication, Sage Annual Review of Communication Research 16:110-134.
91. Roloff, Michael E. 1981. Interpersonal communication: The social exchange approach. London, CA: Sage.
92. Sadek, David. 2000. Dialogue acts are rational plans. In The structure ofmutimodal dialogue, eds. M. Taylor, F. Néel, and D. Bouwhuis, pp. 167-187. Benjamins. From ESCA/ETRW, Workshop on the Structure of Multimodal Dialogue (Venaco II), 1991.
93. Schudson, Michael. 1978. The idea of conversation in the study of mass media. Communication Research 12(5):320-329.
94. Searle, John R. 1969. Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
95. Shannon, Claude E. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal 27:379-423.
96. Short, John, Ederyn, William, and Bruce, Christie. 1976. The social psychology of telecommunications. London: Wiley.
97. Silverstone, Roger and Haddon, Leslie. 1996. Design and the domestication of information and communication technologies: Technical change and everyday life. In Communication by design: The politics of information and communication technologies, eds. R. Silverstone and R. Mansell, pp. 44-74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
98. Simmel, Georg. 1900. Die Herrschaft der Tecknik In Philosophie des Geldes, pp. 520-535. Leipzig: Dunker und Humblot.
99. Traum, David R., and Hinkelman, Elisabeth A. 1992. Conversation acts in task orientated spoken dialogue, Technical Report No. 425. Computer Science Department, University of Rochester, Rochester, Also in Computational Intelligence 8(3), August 1992.
100. Traum, David R., and Hinkelman, Elisabeth A. 1992. Conversation acts in task orientated spoken dialogue, Technical Report No. 425. Computer Science Department, University of Rochester, Rochester, Also in Computational Intelligence 8(3), August 1992.
101. Turkle, Sherry. 1995. Life on the screen: Identity in the age of Internet. New York: Simon and Schuster.
102. Walther, Joseph B. 1996. Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research 23(1):S3-43.
103. Wellman, Barry. 2001. Physical place and cyberplace: The rise of personalized networking. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 25(2):227-252.
104. Wolf, Mario. 1992. Gli effetti sociali dei media. Milano: Bompiani.
105. Wyatt, Sally. 2003. Non-users also matter: The construction of users and non-users of the Internet. In How users matter: The co-construction of users and technology, eds. N. Oudshoorn and T. Pinch, pp. 67-69. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.