Clinical outcome of dental implants placed with high insertion torques (Up to 176Ncm)

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 227-233

  Khayat, Philippe G ^a,b   Arnal, Hélène M ^c   Tourbah, Bahige I ^c   Sennerby, Lars ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b University of Paris ^*

^c University of Paris II   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Crestal bone; Implant; Insertion torque

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; CLASSIFICATION; EDENTULOUSNESS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; JAW; MALE; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TORQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ALVEOLAR PROCESS; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS, PARTIALLY; MALE; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MIDDLE AGED; OSSEOINTEGRATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TORQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84875808868     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: 17088208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00351.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Szmukler-Moncler S, Piatelli A, Favero GA, Dubruille JH. Considerations preliminary to the application of early and immediate loading protocols in dental implantology. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11:12-25.
2. Brunski JB. In vivo bone response to biomechanical loading at the bone/dental-implant interface. Adv Dent Res 1999; 13:99-119.
3. Calandriello R, Tomatis M, Rangert B. Immediate functional loading of Brånemark system implants with enhanced initial stability: a prospective 1- to 2-year clinical and radiographic study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003; 5:10-20.
4. Barone A, Covani U, Cornelini R, Gherlone E. Radiographic bone density around immediately loaded oral implants. A case series. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14:610-613.
5. Romanos GE, Toh CG, Siar CH, Swaminathan D. Histologic and histomporphmetric evaluation of peri-implant bone subjected to immediate loading: an experimental study with Macaca fascicularis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002; 17:44-51.
6. Cochran DL. Report of the American Academy of Periodontology's Workshop on the Design and Conduct of Clinical Trials for Endosseous Dental Implants. J Periodontol 1998; 69:280-284.
7. Barewal R, Oates T, Meredith N, Cochran D. Resonance frequency measurement of implant stability in vivo on implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18:641-651.
8. Beer A, Gahleitner A, Holm A, Tschabitscher M, Homolka P. Correlation of insertion torques with bone mineral density from dental quantitative CT in the mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14:616-620.
9. Martinez H, Davarpanah M, Missika P, Celletti R, Lazzara R. Optimal implant stabilization in low density bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12:423-432.
10. Meredith N. Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant. Int J Prosthodont 1998; 11:491-501.
11. Nkenke E, Hahn M, Weinzierl K, Radespiel-Tröger M, Neukam FW, Engelke K. Dental implant stability and histomorphometry: a correlation study in human cadavers. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14:601-609.
12. O'Sullivan D, Sennerby L, Meredith N. Measurements comparing the initial stability of five designs of dental implants: a human cadaver study. Clin Implant Dent Rela Res 2000; 2:85-92.
13. Sennerby L, Roos J. Surgical determinants of clinical success of osseointegrated oral implants: a review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont 1998; 11:408-420.
14. Nikellis I, Levi A, Nicolopoulos C. Immediate loading of 190 endosseous dental implants: a prospective observational study of 40 patients treatments with up to 2-years data. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19:116-123.
15. Skalak R, Zhao Y. Interaction of force-fitting and surface roughness of implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000; 2:219-224.
16. Le Gall MG. Localized sinus elevation and osteocompression with single-stage tapered dental implants: technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19:431-437.
17. Nkenke E, Kloss F, Wiltfang J, etal. Histomorphometric and fluorescence microscopic analysis of bone remodeling after installation of implants using an osteotome technique. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13:595-602.
18. Meredith N, Book K, Friberg B, Jemt T, Sennerby L. Resonance frequency measurements of implant stability in vivo. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997; 8:226-233.
19. Ueda M, Matsuki M, Jacobsson M, Tjellström A. The relationship between insertion torque and removal torque analysed in fresh temporal bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991; 6:442-447.
20. Friberg B, Jisander S, Widmark G, etal. One year prospective three center study comparing the outcome of a "soft bone implant" (prototype Mk IV) and the standard Brånemark implant. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003; 5:71-77.
21. Hui E, Chow J, Li D, Liu J, Wat P, Law H. Immediate provisional single-tooth implant replacement with Brånemark system: preliminary report. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2001; 3:79-86.
22. Johansson P, Strid KG. Assessment of bone quality from cutting resistance during implant surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994; 9:279-288.
23. Lorenzoni M, Pertl C, Zhang K, Wimmer G, Wegscheider W. Immediate loading of single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla. Preliminary results after one year. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14:180-187.
24. Beer A, Gahleitner A, Holm A, Birkfellner W, Homolka P. Adapted preparation technique for screw-type implants: explorative in vitro pilot study in a porcine bone model. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18:103-107.
25. Sakoh J, Wahlmann U, Stender E, Nat R, Al-Nawas B, Wagner W. Primary stability of a conical implant and a hybrid, cylindric screw-type implant in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21:560-566.
26. Akça K, Akkocaoglu M, Comert A, Tekdemir I, Cehreli MC. Human ex vivo bone tissue strains around immediately loaded implants supporting maxillary overdentures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16:715-722.
27. Rabel A, Köhler SG, Schmidt-Westhausen AM. Clinical study on the primary stability of two dental implant systems with resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Investig 2007; 11:257-265.
28. Friberg B, Sennerby L, Meredith N, Lekholm U. A comparison between cutting torque and resonance frequency measurements of maxillary implants. A 20 months clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999; 28:297-303.
29. Malo P, Rangert B, Dvarsater L. Immediate function of Brånemark implants in the esthetic zone: a retrospective clinical study with 6 months to 4 years of follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000; 2:138-146.
30. Horiuchi K, Uchida H, Yamamoto K, Sugimura M. Immediate loading of Branemark system implants following placement in edentulous patients: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15:824-830.
31. Ottoni JM, Oliveira ZF, Mansini R, Cabral AM. Correlation between placement torque and survival of single-tooth implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20:769-776.
32. Neugebauer J, Traini T, Thams U, Piatelli A, Zöller JE. Peri-implant bone organization under immediate loading state. Circularly polarized light analyses: a minipig study. J Periodontol 2006; 77:152-160.
33. Friberg B, Sennerby L, Gröndahl K, Bergström C, Bäck T, Lekholm U. On cutting torque measurements during implant placement: a 3 years clinical prospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 1999; 1:75-83.
34. Tricio J, Van Steenberghe D, Rosenberg D, Duchateau L. Implant stability related to insertion torque force and bone density: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 74:608-612.
35. Alsaadi G, Quirynen M, Michiels K, Jacobs R, Van Steenberghe D. A biomechanical assessment of the relation between the oral implant stability at insertion and subjective bone quality assessment. J Clin Periodontol 2007; 34:359-366.
36. Turkyilmaz I, Tumer C, Ozbek EN, Tözüm TF. Relations between the bone density values from computerized tomography, and implant stability parameters: a clinical study of 230 regular platform implants. J Clin Periodontol 2007; 34:716-722.
37. Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. In: Brånemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T, eds. Tissue integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago, IL: Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc., 1985:199-209.
38. Albrektsson TO, Johnansson CB, Sennerby L. Biological aspects of implant dentistry: osseointegration. Periodontol 2000 1994; 4:58-73.
39. Niimi A, Ozeki K, Ueda M, Nakayama B. A comparative study of removal torque of endosseous implants in the fibula, iliac crest and scapula of cadavers: preliminary report. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997; 8:286-289.
40. Becker W, Becker BE, Huffstetler S. Early functional loading at 5 days for Branemark implants placed into edentulous mandibles: a prospective, open-ended, longitudinal study. J Periodontol 2003; 74:695-702.
41. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Brånemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981; 10:387-416.
42. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986; 1:11-25.
43. Smith DE, Zarb GA. Criteria for success of osseointegrated endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 62:567-572.