A prospective comparison of totally minimally invasive versus open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy

Diseases of the Esophagus

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 263-271

  Noble, F ^a,b   Kelly, J J ^a   Bailey, I S ^a   Byrne, J P ^a   Underwood, T J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SOUTHAMPTON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Esophagectomy; Esophagus; General surgery; Minimally invasive; Neoplasm; Surgical procedure

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

ADENOSQUAMOUS CARCINOMA; ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ARTICLE; ATELECTASIS; BLEEDING; BODY MASS; CANCER ADJUVANT THERAPY; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURVIVAL; CATHETER; CHYLE LEAK; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLIP; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAPHRAGM HERNIA; ESOPHAGEAL ADENOCARCINOMA; ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; ESOPHAGUS CARCINOMA; ESOPHAGUS DILATATION; ESOPHAGUS DYSPLASIA; ESOPHAGUS RESECTION; ESOPHAGUS STENOSIS; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL STROMAL TUMOR; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HUMAN; HYPOPHOSPHATEMIA; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; IVOR LEWIS ESOPHAGECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; LUNG DISEASE; LUNG EMBOLISM; LYMPH NODE; LYMPHATIC SYSTEM DISEASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE TWO STAGE ESOPHAGECTOMY; NON ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; OPEN ESOPHAGECTOMY; PATIENT SELECTION; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SECOND LOOK SURGERY; STAPLER; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; URINE RETENTION;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANASTOMOTIC LEAK; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; CHEMOTHERAPY, ADJUVANT; COHORT STUDIES; ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS; ESOPHAGECTOMY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LAPAROTOMY; LENGTH OF STAY; LYMPH NODE EXCISION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOADJUVANT THERAPY; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASM STAGING; OPERATIVE TIME; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; THORACOSCOPY; THORACOTOMY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84875807865     PISSN: 11208694     EISSN: 14422050     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01356.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Lepage C, Rachet B, Jooste V, Faivre J, Coleman M P. Continuing rapid increase in esophageal adenocarcinoma in England and Wales. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103: 2694-9.
2. Nguyen N T, Roberts P, Follette D M, Rivers R, Wolfe B M. Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy for benign and malignant disease: lessons learned from 46 consecutive procedures. J Am Coll Surg 2003; 197: 902-13.
3. Bizekis C, Kent M S, Luketich J D etal. Initial experience with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 82: 402-6; discussion 406-7.
4. Barreto J C, Posner M C. Transhiatal versus transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16: 3804-10.
5. Butler N, Collins S, Memon B, Memon M A. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy: current status and future direction. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 2071-83.
6. Omloo J M, Lagarde S M, Hulscher J B etal. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the mid/distal esophagus: five-year survival of a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 2007; 246: 992-1000; discussion 1001.
7. Smithers B M, Gotley D C, Martin I, Thomas J M. Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Surg 2007; 245: 232-40.
8. National Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Audit. Third Annual Report. 1-69. London: The NHS Information Centre, 2010.
9. Nagpal K, Ahmed K, Vats A etal. Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 1621-9.
10. Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Banting S. Endoscopic oesophagectomy through a right thoracoscopic approach. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1992; 37: 7-11.
11. Watson D I, Davies N, Jamieson G G. Totally endoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 1999; 13: 293-7.
12. Parameswaran R, Blazeby J M, Hughes R, Mitchell K, Berrisford R G, Wajed S A. Health-related quality of life after minimally invasive oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 2010; 97: 525-31.
13. Luketich J D, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura P O etal. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg 2003; 238: 486-94; discussion 494-5.
14. Puntambekar S P, Agarwal G A, Joshi S N, Rayate N V, Sathe R M, Patil A M. Thoracolaparoscopy in the lateral position for esophageal cancer: the experience of a single institution with 112 consecutive patients. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 2407-14.
15. Verhage R J, Hazebroek E J, Boone J, Van Hillegersberg R. Minimally invasive surgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Minerva Chir 2009; 64: 135-46.
16. Hamouda A H, Forshaw M J, Tsigritis K etal. Perioperative outcomes after transition from conventional to minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in a specialized center. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 865-9.
17. Montenovo M I, Chambers K, Pellegrini C A, Oelschlager B K. Outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophago-gastric junction. Dis Esophagus 2011; 24: 430-6.
18. Parameswaran R, Veeramootoo D, Krishnadas R, Cooper M, Berrisford R, Wajed S. Comparative experience of open and minimally invasive esophagogastric resection. World J Surg 2009; 33: 1868-75.
19. Pham T H, Perry K A, Dolan J P etal. Comparison of perioperative outcomes after combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy and open Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. Am J Surg 2010; 199: 594-8.
20. Safranek P M, Cubitt J, Booth M I, Dehn T C. Review of open and minimal access approaches to oesophagectomy for cancer. Br J Surg 2010; 97: 1845-53.
21. Singh R K, Pham T H, Diggs B S, Perkins S, Hunter J G. Minimally invasive esophagectomy provides equivalent oncologic outcomes to open esophagectomy for locally advanced (stage II or III) esophageal carcinoma. Arch Surg 2011; 146: 711-14.
22. Blazeby J M, Blencowe N S, Titcomb D R, Metcalfe C, Hollowood A D, Barham C P. Demonstration of the IDEAL recommendations for evaluating and reporting surgical innovation in minimally invasive oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 2011; 98: 544-51.
23. Schoppmann S F, Prager G, Langer F B etal. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-center case controlled study. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 3044-53.
24. Ben-David K, Sarosi G A, Cendan J C, Hochwald S N. Technique of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy with intrathoracic stapled side-to-side anastomosis. J Gastrointest Surg 2010; 14: 1613-18.
25. Cadiere G B, Dapri G, Himpens J, Rajan A. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy in prone position. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18: 838.
26. Cadiere G B, Dapri G, Himpens J, Fodderie L, Rajan A. Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with manual esogastric anastomosis by thoracoscopy in prone position and laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 1482-5.
27. Tapias L F, Morse C R. A preliminary experience with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus 2011; [Epub ahead of print]. DOI: 10.1111/j. 1442-2050.2011.01269.x.
28. Hardwick R H, The Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons (AUGIS), The Association of Laparoscopic Surgeons of Great Britain & Ireland, ALS. A Consensus View and Recommendations on the Development and Practice of Minimally Invasive Oesophagectomy. 1-8. 2009, AUGIS 2011. [Cited 01 January 2011.] Available from URL: http://www.augis.org
29. Sobin L H, Compton C C. TNM seventh edition: what's new, what's changed: communication from the International Union Against Cancer and the American Joint Committee on Cancer. Cancer 2010; 116: 5336-9.
30. Clavien P A, Barkun J, de Oliveira M L etal. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 2009; 250: 187-96.
31. Lewis I. The surgical treatment of carcinoma of the oesophagus; with special reference to a new operation for growths of the middle third. Br J Surg 1946; 34: 18-31.
32. Mandard A M, Dalibard F, Mandard J C etal. Pathologic assessment of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy of esophageal carcinoma. Clinicopathologic correlations. Cancer 1994; 73: 2680-6.
33. Rice T W, Blackstone E H, Adelstein D J etal. N1 esophageal carcinoma: the importance of staging and downstaging. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001; 121: 454-64.
34. Leers J M, Ayazi S, Hagen J A etal. Survival in lymph node negative adenocarcinoma of the esophagus after R0 resection with and without neoadjuvant therapy: evidence for downstaging of N status. J Am Coll Surg 2009; 208: 553-6.
35. Biere S S, Maas K W, Bonavina L etal. Traditional invasive vs. minimally invasive esophagectomy: a multi-center, randomized trial (TIME-trial). BMC Surg 2011; 11: 2: 1-7.
36. Kunzli B M, Friess H, Shrikhande S V. Is laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery equal to open surgery? An evidence based perspective. World J Gastrointest Surg 2010; 2: 101-8.
37. Abu Hilal M, Underwood T, Zuccaro M, Primrose J, Pearce N. Short- and medium-term results of totally laparoscopic resection for colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg 2010; 97: 927-33.
38. Allum W H, Blazeby J M, Griffin S M, Cunningham D, Jankowski J A, Wong R. Guidelines for the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer. Gut 2011; 60: 1449-72.
39. Luketich J D, Awais O, Shende M etal. Outcomes after Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy American Association of Surgeons 131st annual meeting. 2011; Abstract 21: 76. [Cited 09 January 2011.] Available from URL: http://www.americansurgical.info/files/2011/ASA11-Program-Book-for-Web.pdf