A behavioral approach to modeling Indian children's ability of adopting to e-learning environment

4th International Conference on Intelligent Human Computer Interaction: Advancing Technology for Humanity, IHCI 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Deshpande, Yogesh ^a   Bhattacharya, Samit ^a   Yammiyavar, Pradeep ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY GUWAHATI   (India)

Author keywords

e learning adoption; school education; TAM model

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL APPROACHES; BEHAVIOURAL INTENTIONS; E-LEARNING ENVIRONMENT; FACILITATING CONDITIONS; INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES; SCHOOL EDUCATION; TAM MODEL; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL;

DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; E-LEARNING; EDUCATION; EDUCATION COMPUTING; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION;

EID: 84875748876     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IHCI.2012.6481776     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. 1977. Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin. 84, 5 (1977), 888-918.
2. Al-alak, B. and Alnawas, I. 2011. Measuring the Acceptance and Adoption of E-Learning by Academic Staff. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: 3, 2 (2011), 201-221.
3. Brown, I. 2002. Individual and technological factors affecting perceived ease of use of web-based learning technologies in a developing country. Information Systems in Developing Countries (EJISDC). 9, 5 (2002), 1-15.
4. Chen, H. and Tseng, H. 2012. Factors that influence acceptance of web-based e-learning systems for the in-service education of junior high school teachers in Taiwan. Evaluation and Program Planning. 35, 3 (2012), 398-406.
5. Chopra, H. 2005. Importance of Digital Library for E-Learning in India. CALIBER 2005, Cochin, India (2005), 2-4.
6. Davis, F. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly. 13, 3 (1989), 319-340.
7. Debarshi Mukherjee 2008. RM39-09-002 eLearning a Potential Learning Solution for Rural India - A Critical Analysis Debarshi Mukherjee*. Marketing to Rural Consumers (2008), 2-5.
8. Dhariwal Manuj 2010. Designing for Children with focus on "Play+Learn:," http://www.designingforchildren.net/papers/manuj- dhariwal-designingforchildren.pdf. Accessed: 2012-08-22.
9. Edmunds, R. et al. 2012. Student attitudes towards and use of ICT in course study, work and social activity: A technology acceptance model approach 1142 71.84. British Journal Of Educational Technology. 43, 1 (2012), 71-84.
10. Hasan M. Selim 2006. E-Learning Acceptance Model (ELAM). Emerging Trends And Challenges In IT Management. M. Khosrow-Pour, ed. 73-77.
11. Hei Longjiang 2011. A feasibility study on the adoption of e-learning for middle school teachers' continuing education in China. Information TechnologyU: New Generations (2011), 1052-1053.
12. Ju T.L., Hao-Fan C, Y.-H.C. 2007. E-Learning System - Integrating Information Quality, System Quality And Habitual Domain With Tam. IADIS Conference On E-Learning (2007), 415-420.
13. Kadivar, M. and Lee, C. 2010. Evaluating an ontology based E-learning data model using the TAM model. ICCE 2010, Putrajaya, Malaysia (2010), 325-327.
14. Kam, M. et al. 2008. Designing e-learning games for rural children in India: a format for balancing learning with fun. Designing interactive systems (2008), 58-67.
15. Kanaujia, S. 2004. E-Education in IndiaD: Pace of Learning on a Hi-Tech Path. CALIBER 2004, New Delhi, India (2004), 11-13.
16. Kim, Sung-wan, Seo, B.-H. 2009. The Development of e-Learning Platform for Gifted Children Education Effective Instructional Model for Elementary Gifted Education. Educational Media And Technology. 3, 1 (2009), 39-51.
17. Masrom, M. 2007. Technology acceptance model and E-learning. International Conference On Education (2007), 1-10.
18. Mikalsen, M Walderhaug, S. 2009. An Investigation of Factors Influencing Healthcare Workers' Use and Acceptance of E-Learning in Post-School Healthcare Education. Medical Informatics In a United and Healthy Europe. 7465 (2009), 893-897.
19. Park, S. 2009. An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students' behavioral intention to use E-learning. Educational Technology & Society. 12, 3 (2009), 150-162.
20. Rajpal, S. et al. 2008. E-Learning Revolution: Status of Educational Programs in India. International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists (2008), 19-21.
21. Ray, P.P. 2012. Web based e-learning in india: the cumulative views of different aspects. Indian Journal Of Computer Science And Engineering. 1, 4 (2012), 340-352.
22. Schmitt, N. 1996. Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment. 8, 4 (1996), 350-353.
23. Wanchoo, S. et al. 2010. MeLTs; A new approach to delivery of E-learning in remote and un-served rural areas in India. LINC 2010 Conference (2010).