Industrial robots – the new friends of an aging workforce?

Advances in Ergonomics in Manufacturing

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 253-262

  Bortot, Dino ^a   Hawe, Benno ^a   Schmidt, Silvia ^a   Bengler, Klaus ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Acceptance; Distraction; HRI; Human robot coexistence; Human robot interaction; Performance; Trust; Visual behavior

Indexed keywords

AUDITION; INDUSTRIAL ROBOTS; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS;

ACCEPTANCE; DISTRACTION; HUMAN ROBOTS; PERFORMANCE; TRUST; VISUAL BEHAVIOR;

HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION;

EID: 84875735209     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/b12322     Document Type: Chapter

References (14)

1. Bartneck, C., D. Kulić, E. Croft and S. Zoghbi. 2009. Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots. International Journal of Social Robotics Vol. 1, 71‒81.
2. Beauchamp, Y. and T. J. Stobbe. 1990. The effects of factors on human performance in the event of an unexpected robot motion. Journal of Safety Research 21 (3), 83‒96.
3. Bortot, D., Ding, H., Antonopolous, A., Bengler, K. 2012. Human motion behavior while interacting with an industrial robot. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation 41 (Supplement 1/2012), S. 1699-1707.
4. Butler, J. T. and A. Agah. 2001. Psychological Effects of Behavior Patterns of a Mobil Robot. Autonomous Robots 10. 185-202.
5. Gaudart, C. 2000. Conditions for maintaining ageing operators at work-a case study conducted at an automobile manufacturing plant. Applied Ergonomics (31), 453-462.
6. Hanajima, N., M. Fujimoto, H. Hikita, and M. Yamashita (Ed.). 2004. Influence of Auditory and Visual modalities on Skin Potential Response to Robot Motions. Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 1226-1231.
7. Hanajima, N., Y. Ohta, H. Hikita and M. Yamashita. 2005. Investigation of impressions for approach motion of a mobile robot based on psychophysiological analysis. 2005 IEEE International Workshop on Robots and Human Interactive Communication, 79‒84.
8. Hart, S. G. and L. E. Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. P. A. Hancock and N. Meshkati (Eds.): Human Mental Workload. Amsterdam: North Holland Press.
9. ISO 15007-1 2002. Road vehicles-Measurement of driver visual behaviour with respect to transport information and control systems-Definitions and parameters.
10. Khan, Z. 1998. Attitudes towards intelligent service robots. Technical report TRITA-NAP9821. NADA.
11. Kulić, D. and E. Croft. 2007. Physiological and subjective responses to articulated robot motion. Robotica 25, 13-27.
12. Lange, C., R. Spies, H. Bubb, and K. Bengler. 2010. Automated Analysis of Eye-Tracking Data for the Evaluation of Driver Information Systems According to EN ISO 15007-1 and ISO/TS 15007-2. Advances in Ergonomics Modeling and Usability Evaluation
13. Nonaka, S., K. Inoue, T. Arai and Y. Mae. 2004. Evaluation of human sense of security for coexisting robots using virtual reality. 1st report: Evaluation of pick and place motion of humanoid robots. Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation. 2770-2775. 147-152.
14. Yamada, Y., Y. Umetani and Y. Hirawawa. 1999. Proposal of a psychophysiological experiment system applying the reaction of human pupillary dilation to frightening robot motions. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. 1052-1057.