Enhancing rice breeding efficiency: The role of breeding informatics

Sabrao Journal of Breeding and Genetics

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 143-158

  Ye, G ^a   Collard, B C Y ^a   Zhao, X Q ^a   Nissila, E ^a  

^a INTERNATIONAL RICE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Philippines)

Author keywords

Breeding informatics; Breeding trials; Breeding value; Marker assisted selection

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875722109     PISSN: 10297073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (88)

1. Allard RW (1960). Principles of plant breeding. Wiley, New York.
2. Atlin GN, Baker RJ, McRae KB, Lu X (2000). Selection response in subdivided target regions. Crop Sci. 40: 7-13
3. Bauer AM, Leon J (2008). Multiple-trait breeding values for parental selection in self-pollinating crops. Theor. Appl. Genet. 116: 235-242
4. Bauer AM, Reetz TC, Leon J (2006). Estimation of breeding values of inbred lines using best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) and genetic similarities. Crop Sci. 46: 2685-2691
5. Bauer AM, Reetz TC, Leon J (2008). Predicting breeding values of spring barley accessions by using the singular value decomposition of genetic similarities. Plant Breed. 127: 274-278
6. Bernardo R (2002). Breeding for quantitative traits in plants. Stemma Press, Woodbury, Minnesota, USA.
7. Bernardo R (2009). Genome-wide selection with minimal crossing in self-pollinated crops. Crop Sci. 50: 624-627
8. Bernardo R, Yu J (2007). Prospects for genome-wide selection for quantitative traits in maize. Crop Sci. 47: 1082-1090.
9. Besag J, Kempton R (1986). Statistical analysis of field experiments using neighboring plots. Biometrics 42: 231-251
10. Bueno JSD, Gilmour SG (2003). Planning incomplete block experiments when treatments are genetically related. Biometrics 59: 375-381
11. Brownie C, Gumpertz ML (1997). Validity of spatial analyses for large field trials. Journal of Agricultural Biological and Environmental Statistics 122:1-23
12. Clarke GPY, Stefanova K (2011). Optimal design for early generation plant breeding trials with unreplicated or partially replicated test lines. Aust. NZ. J. Stat. 53: 461-480
13. Collard BCY, Mackill DJ (2008). Marker assisted selection: an approach for precision plant breeding in the twenty-first century. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 363: 557-572
14. Cooper M, Byth DE (1996). Understanding plant adaptation to achieve systematic applied crop improvement-a fundamental challenge. In: Cooper M, Hammer GL eds. Plant adaptation and crop improvement. CAB International, Oxford, UK. pp. 5-23.
15. Cooper M, Hammer GL (1996). Plant adaptation and crop improvement. CAB International, Oxford, UK.
16. Cooper M, Woodruff DR, Eisemann RI, Brennan PS, DeLacy IH (1995). A strategy to accommodate genotype-by-environment interaction for grain yield of wheat: Managed-environments for selection among genotypes. Theor. Appl. Genet. 90: 492-502
17. Crossa J, Burgueno J, Cornelius PL, McLaren G, Trethowan R, Anitha K (2006). Modeling genotype x environment interaction using additive genetic covariances of relatives for predicting breeding values of wheat genotypes. Crop Sci. 46: 1722-1733
18. Crossa J, Campos G de los, Pérez P, Gianola D, Burgueňo J, Araus JL, Makumbi D, Singh RP, Dreisigacker S, Yan J, Arief V, Banziger M, Braun HJ (2010). Prediction of genetic values of quantitative traits in plant breeding using pedigree and molecular markers. Genetics 186: 713-724
19. Cullis BR, Gogel BJ, Verbyla AP, Thompson R (1998). Spatial analysis of multi-environment early generation trials. Biometrics 54: 1-18
20. Cullis BR, Lill WJ, Fisher JA, Read BJ (1989). A new procedure for the analysis of early generation variety trials. Applied Statistics 2:361-375
21. Cullis BR, Smith A, Coombes N (2006). On the design of early generation variety trials with correlated data. J. Agr. Biol. Envir. Stat. 11: 381-393
22. Davik J, Honne BI (2005). Genetic variance and breeding values for resistance to a wind-borne disease [Sphaerotheca macularis (Wallr ex Fr)] in strawberry (Fragaria ·ananassa Duch) estimated by exploring mixed and spatial models and pedigree information. Theor. Appl. Genet. 111: 256-264
23. Dutkowski GW, Costa e Silva J, Gilmour AR, Lopez GA (2002). Spatial analysis methods for forest genetic trials. Can. J. Forest Res. 32: 2201-2214
24. Eathington SR, Crosbie TM, Edwards MD, Reiter RS, Bull JK (2007). Molecular markers in a commercial breeding program. Crop Sci. 47(S): 154-163
25. Federer WT (1998). Recovery of interblock, intergradient, and intervarietal information in incomplete block and lattice rectangle designed experiments. Biometrics 54: 471-481
26. Federer WT (2002). Construction and analysis of an augmented lattice square design. Biometrical Journal 44: 251-257
27. Federer WT (2003) Exploratory model selection for spatially designed experiments-some examples. Journal of Data Science 1: 231-248
28. Federer WT, Wolfinger RD (2003). Augmented row-column design and trend analysis. In Kang MS (Ed.) Handbook of formulas and software for plant geneticists and breeders. Food Products Press, Binghamton, NY.
29. Gauch HG (1992). Statistical analysis of regional yield trials: AMMI analysis of factorial designs. Elsevier, Amsterdam
30. Gilmour AR., Cullis BR, Verbyla AP (1997). Accounting for natural and extraneous variation in the analysis of field experiments. J. Agr. Biol. Envir. Stat. 2: 269-293.
31. Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR., Thompson R (2009). ASReml User Guide Release 3.0 VSN International Ltd, Hemel Hempstead, HP1 1ES, UK. www.vsni.co.uk
32. Goddard M (2009). Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximization of long term response. Genetica 136: 245-257
33. Guo Z, Tucker DM, Lu J, Kishore V, Gay G (2012) Evaluation of genomewide selection efficiency in maize nested association mapping populations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 124: 261-275.
34. Habier D, Fernando R, Dekkers J (2009). Genomic Selection Using Low-Density Marker Panels. Genetics. 182: 343-353
35. Hallauer AR (1985). Compendium of recurrent selection methods and their applications. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 3: 1-33
36. Hammer GL, Cooper M, Tardieu F, Welch S, Walsh B, van Eeuwijk E, Chapman SC, Podlich D (2006). Models for navigating biological complexity in breeding improved crop plants. Trends Plant Sci. 11: 587-593.
37. Heffner EL, Jannink JL, Iwata H, Souza E, Sorrells M E (2011). Genomic selection accuracy for grain quality traits in biparental wheat populations. Crop Sci. 51: 2597-2606.
38. Heffner EL, Lorenz AJ, Jannink JL, Sorrells ME (2010). Plant breeding with genomic selection: Gain per unit time and cost. Crop Sci. 50: 1681-1690.
39. Heffner EL, Sorrells ME, Jannink JL (2009). Genomic selection for crop improvement. Crop Sci. 49: 1-12.
40. Henderson CR (1984). Applications of linear models in animal breeding. University of Guelph.
41. Hospital F, Moreau L, Lacoudre F, Charcosset, A, Gallais A (1997). More on the efficiency of marker assisted selection. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95: 1181-1189.
42. Hosptial F, Golderinger I, Openshaw S (2000). Efficient marker-based recurrent selection for multiple quantitative trait loci. Genet. Res. 75: 357-368
43. Huang X, Wei X, Sang T, Zhao Q, Feng Q, et al. (2010). Genome-wide association studies of 14 agronomic traits in rice landraces. Nat. Genet. 42: 961-969.
44. John JA, Williams ER (1995). Cyclic and computer generated designs. Chapman and Hall, London.
45. Kempton, RA Gleeson AC (1997). Unreplicated trials. In Statistical Methods for Plant Variety Evaluation. Eds Kempton and Fox. Chapman and Hall, London.
46. Kemption RA, Seraphin JC, Sword AM (1994). Statistical analysis of two-dimensional variation in variety yield trials. J. Agric. Sci. 122: 335-342
47. Kovacs MA, Groeneveld E (2003) VCE-5 User's Guide and Reference Manual, Version 5.1. Institute of Animal Husbandry and Animal Behaviour, Federal Research Center of Agriculture, Mariensee, Germany, p.68.
48. Li X, Yan W, Agrama H, Jia L, Shen X, et al. (2011). Mapping QTLs for improving grain yield using the USDA rice mini-core collection. Planta 234: 347-361
49. Li X, Yan W, Agrama H, Jia L, Jackson A, et al. (2012) Unraveling the complex trait of harvest index with association mapping in rice (Oryza sativa L.). PLoS ONE 7(1): e29350. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029350
50. Lynch M, Walsh B (1998). Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland MA, USA.
51. Lorenzana RE, Bernardo R (2009). Accuracy of genotypic value predictions for marker-based selection in biparental plant populations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 120: 151-161.
52. Madsen P, Jensen J, (2006) A User's Guide to DMU: A package for analyzing multivariate mixed models, Version 6. Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Dept. of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Research Centre Foulum, 8830 Tjele, Denmark, p.27.
53. Meyer K (2007). WOMBAT-A tool for mixed model analyses in quantitative genetics by restricted maximum likelihood (REML). J. Zhejiang Univ. SC-B 8:815-821.
54. Muller BU, Kleinknecht K, J Mohring, Piepho HP (2010). Comparison of spatial models for sugar beet and barley trials. Crop Sci. 50: 794-802.
55. Oakey H, Verbyla A, Pitchford W, Cullis B, Kuchel H (2006). Joint modelling of additive and non-additive genetic line effects in single field trials. Theor. Appl. Genet. 113: 809-819.
56. Olmeda-Arcega, OB, Elias EM, Cantrell RG (1995). Recurrent selection for grain yield in durum wheat. Crop Sci. 35: 714-719.
57. Panter DM, Allen FL (1995a) Using best linear unbiased predictions to enhance breeding for yield in soybean. 1. Choosing parents. Crop Sci. 35: 397-405
58. Panter DM, Allen FL (1995b). Using best linear unbiased predictions to enhance breeding for yield in soybean. 2. Selection of superior crosses from a limited number of yield trials. Crop Sci. 35: 405-410.
59. Parlevliet JE, Van Ommeren A (1988). Recurrent selection for grain yield in early generations of two barley populations. Euphytica 38: 75-184.
60. Patterson HD, Hunter EA (1983). The efficiency of incomplete block designs in National List and Recommended List cereal variety trials. J. Agric. Sci. 101: 427-433
61. Gurimaraes EP (2005). Population improvement: A way of exploiting the genetic resources of Latin America. FAO, Rome, Italy.
62. Piepho HP, Mohring J, Melchinger AE, Buchse, A (2008). BLUP for phenotypic selection in plant breeding and variety testing. Euphytica 161: 209-228.
63. Podlich DW, Cooper M (1998). QU-GENE: A platform for quantitative analysis of genetic models. Bioinformatics 14: 632-653.
64. Qiao GC, Basford KE, DeLacy IH, Cooper M (2000). Evaluation of experimental designs and spatial analyses in wheat breeding trials. Theor. Appl. Genet. 100: 9-16.
65. Robinson DL, Kershaw CD, Ellis RP (1988). An investigation of two-dimensional yield variability in breeders' small plot barley trials. J. Agric. Sci. 111: 419-426
66. Smith AB, Cullis BR, Thompson R (2001). Analyzing variety by environment trials using multiplicative mixed models and adjustments for spatial field trend. Biometrics 57: 1138-1147.
67. Smith AB, Cullis BR, Thompson R (2005). The analysis of crop cultivar breeding and evaluation trials: an overview of current mixed model approaches. J. Agric. Sci. 143: 449-462.
68. Stroup WW, Baenziger PS, Mulitze DK (1994) Removing spatial variation from wheat yield trials: A comparison of methods. Crop Sci. 86: 62-66.
69. Van Oeveren AJ, Stam P (1992). Comparative simulation studies on the effects of selection for quantitative traits in autogamous crops: early selection versus single seed decent. Heredity 69: 342-351.
70. Wilkinson GN, Eckert SR, Hancock TW, Mayo O. (1983). Nearest neighbor (NN) analysis of field experiments. Journal of Royal Statistics Society B 45: 151-211.
71. Williams ER, John JA (2003). A note on the design of unreplicated trials. Biometrical Journal 45: 75-757.
72. Williams ER, John JA (1989). Construction of row and column designs with contiguous replicates. Applied Statistics 38:149-154
73. Whitaker D, Williams ER, John JA. (2001). CycDesigN: A package for the computer generation of experimental designs. CSIRO Forestry and Forest Products, CSIRO, Canberra.
74. Wu T, Mather DE, Dutilleul P (1998). Application of geostatistical and neighbor analyses to data from plant breeding trials. Crop Sci. 38: 1545-1553.
75. Wu T, Dutilleul P (1999). Validity and efficiency of neighbor analyses in comparison with classical complete and incomplete block analyses of field experiments. Agron. J. 91: 721-731.
76. Xu S, Hu Z (2010). Methods of plant breeding in the genome era. Genet. Res. 92: 423-441.
77. Yan WK, Kang MS (2003). GGE Biplot Analysis: A Graphical Tool for Breeders, Geneticists, and Agronomists. CRC Press.
78. Ye G, Eagles HA, Dieters MJ (2004). Parental selection using known genes for inbred line development. In 'Cereals 2004, Proceedings of 54th Australian Cereal Chemistry Conferences and 11th Wheat Breeders Assembly' pp. 245-248.
79. Ye G, Moody D, Livinus E, van Ginkel M (2007). Designing an optimal marker-based pedigree selection strategy for parent building in barley in the presence of repulsion linkage, using computer simulation. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 58: 243-251.
80. Ye G, Smith KF (2010). Marker-assisted gene pyramiding for cultivar development. Plant Breeding Reviews 33: 219-256
81. Ye G, Ogbonnaya FC, Van Ginkel (2009). The use of marker-assisted recurrent backcrossing in cultivar development. In Singh RK, R Singh, G Ye, A Selvi, and GP Rao (Eds). Molecular Breeding in Crops: Principle, Method and Application pp 295-319. Studium Press, LLC, Texas, USA.
82. Ye G, Van Ginkel M (2011). Designing marker-assisted inbred line development strategies using computer simulation. Plant Breeding Reviews 34: 297-348.
83. Yu JM, Pressoir G, Briggs WH, Bi IV, Yamasaki M, Doebley JF, McMullen MD, Gaut BS, Nielsen DM, Holland JB, Kresovich S, Buckler ES (2006) A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness. Nat. Genet. 38: 203-208.
84. Zhang YM, Mao YC, Xie CQ, Smith H, Luo L, Xu SZ (2005). Mapping quantitative trait loci using naturally occurring genetic variance among commercial inbred lines of maize (Zea mays L). Genetics 169: 2267-2275.
85. Zhang W, Smith C (1992). Computer simulation of marker-assisted selection utilizing linkage disequilibrium. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83: 813-820.
86. Zhang W, Smith C (1993). Simulation of marker-assisted selection utilizing linkage disequilibrium: the effects of several additional factors. Theor. Appl. Genet. 86: 492-496.
87. Zimmerman DI, Harville DA (1991). A random field approach to the analysis of field-plot experiments and other spatial experiments. Biometrics 47: 223-239.
88. Zhong S, Dekkers JCM, Fernando RL, Jannink JL (2009). Factors affecting accuracy from genomic selection in populations derived from multiple inbred lines: a barley study. Genetics 182:355-364.