Validity of Spatial Analyses for Large Field Trials

Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 1-23

  Brownie, Cavell ^a   Gumpertz, Marcia L ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Autocorrelated errors; Papadakis method; Trend analysis

Indexed keywords

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 0001999709     PISSN: 10857117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1400638     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Baird, D., and Mead, R. (1991), "The Empirical Efficiency and Validity of Two Neighbor Models," Biometrics, 47, 1473-1487.
2. Ball, S. T., Mulla, D. J., and Konzak, C. F. (1993), "Spatial Heterogeneity Affects Variety Trial Interpretation," Crop Science, 33, 931-935.
3. Binns, M. R. and Jui, P. Y. (1985), "A Simulation Study of the Nearest Neighbor Analysis Method of Papadakis," Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 14, 159-172.
4. Bowman, D. T. (1985), "Measured Crop Performance: I. Corn Hybrids," Research Report 102, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
5. Brownie, C., Bowman, D. T., and Burton, J. W. (1993), "Estimating Spatial Variation in Analysis of Data From Yield Trials: A Comparison of Methods," Agronomy Journal, 85, 1244-1253.
6. Cullis, B. R., and Gleeson A. C. (1991), "Spatial Analysis of Field Experiments - An Extension of Two Dimensions," Biometrics, 47, 1449-1460.
7. Deutsch, C. V., and Journel, A. G. (1992), GSLIB Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide, New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Gilmour, A. R. (1992), "TwoD. A Program to Fit a Mixed Linear Model With Two Dimensional Spatial Adjustmen for Local Trend," New South Wales Agriculture Biometric Bulletin No. 1, New South Wales Agriculture, Tamworth, Australia.
9. Gleeson, A. C., and Cullis, B. R. (1987), "Residual Maximum Likelihood (REML) Estimation of a Neighbour Model for Field Experiments," Biometrics, 43, 277-288.
10. Kempton, R. A., Seraphin, J. C., and Sword, A. M. (1994), "Statistical Analysis of Two-Dimensional Variation in Variety Yield Trials," Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge, 122, 335-342.
11. Lill, W. J., Gleeson, A. C., and Cullis, B. R. (1988), "Relative Accuracy of a Neighbour Method for Field Trials," Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge, 111, 339-346.
12. Marx, D., and Stroup, W. W. (1993), "Analysis of Spatial Variability Using PROC MIXED," in Kansas State University Conference on Applied Statistics in Agriculture, Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University, pp. 40-59.
13. SAS Institute Inc. (1992), SAS Technical Report P-229, SAS/STAT Software: Changes and Enhancements. Release 6.07. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
14. Stroup, W. W., Baenziger, P. S., and Mulitze, D. K. (1994), "Removing Spatial Variation From Wheat Yield Trials: A Comparison of Methods," Crop Science, 86, 62-66.
15. Zimmerman, D. L., and Harville, D. A. (1991), "A Random Field Approach to the Analysis of Field-Plot Experiments and Other Spatial Experiments," Biometrics, 47, 223-239.