Response kinetics in the complex chemotaxis signalling pathway of Rhodobacter sphaeroides

Journal of the Royal Society Interface

Volumn 10, Issue 81, 2013, Pages

  Kojadinovic, Mila ^a,c   Armitage, Judith P ^a   Tindall, Marcus J ^b   Wadhams, George H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Chemotaxis; Fold change detection; Response kinetics; Rhodobacter sphaeroides; Weber's Law

Indexed keywords

COMPLEX NETWORKS; ESCHERICHIA COLI; NETWORK ARCHITECTURE; PROTEINS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIGNAL DETECTION;

BACTERIAL CHEMOTAXIS; CELLULAR ARCHITECTURE; CHEMOTAXIS; OPTIMAL ENVIRONMENT; PROTEIN EXPRESSION LEVELS; RESPONSE KINETICS; RHODOBACTER SPHAEROIDES; WEBER'S LAW;

BIOCHEMISTRY;

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GROWTH; CELL ASSAY; CHEMOTAXIS; CYTOARCHITECTURE; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; RHODOBACTER SPHAEROIDES; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CYTOLOGY; DRUG EFFECT; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; KINETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TIME;

PROPIONIC ACID; PROPIONIC ACID DERIVATIVE;

CHEMOTAXIS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, BACTERIAL; KINETICS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROPIONATES; RHODOBACTER SPHAEROIDES; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TIME FACTORS;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84875701870     PISSN: 17425689     EISSN: 17425662     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2012.1001     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Berg HC, Brown DA. 1972 Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli analysed by three-dimensional tracking. Nature 239, 500-504. (doi:10.1038/239500a0)
2. Segall JE, Block SM, Berg HC. 1986 Temporal comparisons in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc. NatlAcad. Sci. USA 83, 8987-8991. (doi:10.1073/pnas. 83.23.8987)
3. Greer-Phillips SE, Stephens BB, Alexandre G. 2004 An energy taxis transducer promotes root colonization by Azospirillum brasilense. J. Bacteriol. 186, 6595-6604. (doi:10.1128/JB.186.19.6595-6604.2004)
4. Miller LD, Yost CK, Hynes MF, Alexandre G. 2007 The major chemotaxis gene cluster of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae is essential for competitive nodulation. Mol. Microbiol. 63, 348-362. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05515.x)
5. 54-dependent transcriptional activator in Vibrio fischeri, is required for motility and symbiotic light-organ colonization. J. Bacteriol. 185, 3547-3557. (doi:10.1128/JB.185. 12.3547-3557.2003)
6. Stoodley P, Sauer K, Davies DG, Costerton JW. 2002 Biofilms as complex differentiated communities. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 56, 187-209. (doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.56.012302.160705)
7. Garvis S, Munder A, Ball G, de Bentzmann S, Wiehlmann L, Ewbank JJ, Tummer B, Filloux A. 2009 Caenorhabditis elegans semi-automated liquid screen reveals a specialized role for the chemotaxis gene cheB2 in Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence. PLoS Pathog. 5, e1000540. (doi:10.1371/journal. ppat.1000540)
8. Williams SM, Chen YT, Andermann TM, Carter JE, McGee DJ, Ottemann KM. 2007 Helicobacter pylori chemotaxis modulates inflammation and bacterium-gastric epithelium interactions in infected mice. Infect. Immun. 75, 3747-3757. (doi:10.1128/IAI.00082-07)
9. Wadhams GH, Armitage JP. 2004 Making sense of it all: bacterial chemotaxis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5, 1024-1037. (doi:10.1038/nrm1524)
10. Berg HC, Tedesco PM. 1975 Transient response to chemotactic stimuli in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 72, 3235-3239. (doi:10.1073/pnas. 72.8.3235)
11. Turner L, Ryu WS, Berg HC. 2000 Real-time imaging of fluorescent flagellar filaments. J. Bacteriol. 182, 2793-2801. (doi:10.1128/JB.182.10.2793- 2801.2000)
12. Baker MD, Wolanin PM, Stock JB. 2006 Signal transduction in bacterial chemotaxis. Bioessays 28, 9-22. (doi:10.1002/bies.20343)
13. Eisenbach M. 2007 A hitchhiker's guide through advances and conceptual changes in chemotaxis. J. Cell Physiol. 213, 574-580. (doi:10.1002/jcp.21238)
14. Hazelbauer GL, Falke JJ, Parkinson JS. 2008 Bacterial chemoreceptors: high-performance signaling in networked arrays. Trends Biochem. Sci. 33, 9-19. (doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2007.09.014)
15. Mao H, Cremer PS, Manson MD. 2003 A sensitive, versatile microfluidic assay for bacterial chemotaxis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 5449-5454. (doi:10. 1073/pnas.0931258100)
16. Mesibov R, Ordal GW, Adler J. 1973 The range of attractant concentrations for bacterial chemotaxis and the threshold and size of response over this range. Weber law and related phenomena. J. Gen. Physiol. 62, 203-223. (doi:10.1085/jgp.62.2.203)
17. Neumann S, Hansen CH, Wingreen NS, Sourjik V. 2010 Differences in signalling by directly and indirectly binding ligands in bacterial chemotaxis. EMBO J. 29, 3484-3495. (doi:10.1038/emboj.2010.224)
18. Kalinin Y, Neumann S, Sourjik V, Wu M. 2010 Responses of Escherichia coli bacteria to two opposing chemoattractant gradients depend on the chemoreceptor ratio. J. Bacteriol. 192, 1796-1800. (doi:10.1128/JB.01507-09)
19. Lazova MD, Ahmed T, Bellomo D, Stocker R, Shimizu TS. 2011 Response rescaling in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 13 870-13 875. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1108608108)
20. Shoval O, Goentoro L, Hart Y, Mayo A, Sontag E, Alon U. 2010 Fold-change detection and scalar symmetry of sensory input fields. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 15 995-16 000. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1002352107)
21. Mackenzie C, Eraso JM, Choudhary M, Roh JH, Zeng X, Bruscella P, Puskas A, Kalpan S. 2007 Postgenomic adventures with Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 61, 283-307. (doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.61.080706.093402)
22. Porter SL, Wadhams GH, Armitage JP. 2008 Rhodobacter sphaeroides: complexity in chemotactic signalling. Trends Microbiol. 16, 251-260. (doi:10. 1016/j.tim.2008.02.006)
23. Porter SL, Wadhams GH, Armitage JP. 2011 Signal processing in complex chemotaxis pathways. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 9, 153-165. (doi:10.1038/nrmicro2505)
24. Hamblin PA, Maguire BA, Grishanin RN, Armitage JP. 1997 Evidence for two chemosensory pathways in Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Mol. Microbiol. 26, 1083-1096. (doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.6502022.x)
25. Porter SL, Warren AV, Martin AC, Armitage JP. 2002 The third chemotaxis locus of Rhodobacter sphaeroides is essential for chemotaxis. Mol. Microbiol. 46, 1081-1094. (doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03218.x)
26. Romagnoli S, Packer HL, Armitage JP. 2002 Tactic responses to oxygen in the phototrophic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides WS8N. J. Bacteriol. 184, 5590-5598. (doi:10.1128/JB.184. 20.5590-5598.2002)
27. Tucker JD, Siebert CA, Escalante M, Adams PG, Olsen JD, Otto C, Stokes DL, Hunter CN. 2010 Membrane invagination in Rhodobacter sphaeroides is initiated at curved regions of the cytoplasmic membrane, then forms both budded and fully detached spherical vesicles. Mol. Microbiol. 76, 833-847. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07153.x)
28. Shah DS, Porter SL, Martin AC, Hamblin PA, Armitage JP. 2000 Fine tuning bacterial chemotaxis: analysis of Rhodobacter sphaeroides behaviour under aerobic and anaerobic conditions by mutation of the major chemotaxis operons and chey genes. EMBO J. 19, 4601-4613. (doi:10.1093/emboj/19. 17.4601)
29. Roh JH, Smith WE, Kaplan S. 2004 Effects of oxygen and light intensity on transcriptome expression in Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1. redox active gene expression profile. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 9146-9155. (doi:10.1074/jbc.M311608200)
30. Hamadeh A, Ingalls B, Sontag E. 2012 Transient dynamic phenotypes as criteria for model discrimination: fold-change detection in Rhodobacter sphaeroides chemotaxis. J. R. Soc. Interface 10, 80. (doi:10.1098/rsif.2012. 0935)
31. Sockett RE, Foster JCA, Armitage JP. 1990 Molecular biology of the Rhodobacter sphaeroides flagellum. FEMS Symp. 53, 473-479.
32. Sistrom WR. 1960 A requirement for sodium in the growth of Rhodopseudomonas spheroides. J. Gen. Microbiol. 22, 778-785. (doi:10.1099/00221287-22-3-778)
33. Kojadinovic M, Sirinelli A, Wadhams GH, Armitage JP. 2011 New motion analysis system for characterization of the chemosensory response kinetics of Rhodobacter sphaeroides under different growth conditions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 4082-4088. (doi:10.1128/AEM.00341-11)
34. Spudich JL, Koshland DE. 1976 Non-genetic individuality: chance in the single cell. Nature 262, 467-471. (doi:10.1038/262467a0)
35. Korobkova E, Emonet T, Vilar JMG, Shimizu TS, Cluzel P. 2004 From molecular noise to behavioural variability in a single bacterium. Nature 428, 574-578. (doi:10.1038/nature02404)
36. Meir Y, Jakovljevic V, Oleksiuk O, Sourjik V, Wingreen NS. 2010 Precision and kinetics of adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis. Biophys. J. 99, 2766-2774. (doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2010.08.051)
37. Tindall MJ, Porter SL, Maini PK, Armitage JP. 2010 Modeling chemotaxis reveals the role of reversed phosphotransfer and a bi-functional kinase-phosphatase. PLoS Comput. Biol. 6, e100896. (doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi. 1000896)
38. Endres RG, Wingreen NS. 2006 Precise adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis through 'assistance neighbourhoods'. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 13 040-13 044. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0603101103)
39. Clausznitzer D, Oleksiuk O, Lovdok L, Sourjik V, Endres RG. 2010 Chemotactic response and adaptation dynamics in Escherichia coli. PLoS Comput. Biol. 6, e1000784. (doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000784)
40. Tu Y, Shimizu TS, Berg HC. 2008 Modeling the chemotactic response of Escherichia coli to timevarying stimuli. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 14 855-14 860. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0807569105)
41. Harrison DM, Skidmore J, Armitage JP, Maddock Jr. 1999 Localization and environmental regulation of Mcp-like proteins in Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Mol. Microbiol. 31, 885-892. (doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958. 1999.01226.x)