Chemotactic response and adaptation dynamics in Escherichia coli

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 6, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1-11

  Clausznitzer, Diana ^a   Oleksiuk, Olga ^b   Løvdok, Linda ^b   Sourjik, Victor ^b   Endres, Robert G ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALKYLATION; BIOCHEMISTRY; CHEMOSENSOR; CYTOLOGY; ENERGY TRANSFER; FLUORESCENCE; NOISE ABATEMENT;

BACKGROUND CONCENTRATION; BIOCHEMICAL MECHANISMS; CELL BEHAVIOURS; CELL MEMORY; CHEMOTACTIC RESPONSE; CHEMOTAXI; CURRENT MODELING; DEMETHYLATION; MECHANISM-BASED; TIME COURSE;

ESCHERICHIA COLI;

CHEMOATTRACTANT; CHEMOREPELLENT;

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; CELL MOTILITY; CHEMORECEPTOR; CHEMOTAXIS; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMETHYLATION; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FLUORESCENCE RESONANCE ENERGY TRANSFER; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; METHYLATION; MODEL; NEGATIVE FEEDBACK; NOISE REDUCTION; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; SENSORY SYSTEM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DNA METHYLATION; DOSE RESPONSE; METHODOLOGY; PHOSPHORYLATION; PHYSIOLOGY; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; THERMODYNAMICS;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; CHEMOTAXIS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DNA METHYLATION; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; ESCHERICHIA COLI; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHOSPHORYLATION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 77955521618     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000784     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Jaasma MJ, Jackson WM, Tang RY, Keaveny TM (2007) Adaptation of cellular mechanical behavior to mechanical loading for osteoblastic cells. J Biomech 40: 1938-1945.
2. Hilliard MA, Apicella AJ, Kerr R, Suzuki H, Bazzicalupo P, et al. (2005) In vivo imaging of C. elegans ASH neurons: cellular response and adaptation to chemical repellents. EMBO J 24: 63-72.
3. Marwan W, Bibikov SI, Montrone M, Oesterhelt D (1995) Mechanism of photosensory adaptation in Halobacterium salinarium. J Mol Biol 246: 493-499.
4. Muzzey D, Gómez-Uribe CA, Mettetal JT, van Oudenaarden A (2009) A systems-level analysis of perfect adaptation in yeast osmoregulation. Cell 138: 160-171.
5. Shi W, Zusman DR (1994) Sensory adaptation during negative chemotaxis in Myxococcus xanthus. J Bacteriol 176: 1517-1520.
6. 2+ - calmodulin feedback mediates sensory adaptation and inhibits pheromonesensitive ion channels in the vomeronasal organ. J Neurosci 29: 2125-2135.
7. Zigmond SH, Sullivan SJ (1979) Sensory adaptation of leukocytes to chemotactic peptides. J Cell Biol 82: 517-527.
8. Pugh EN, Jr., Nikonov S, Lamb TD (1999) Molecular mechanisms of vertebrate photoreceptor light adaptation. Curr Opin Neurobiol 9: 410-418.
9. Baker MD, Wolanin PM, Stock JB (2006) Systems biology of bacterial chemotaxis. Curr Opin Microbiol 9: 187-192.
10. Berg HC (2000) Motile behavior of bacteria. Phys Today 53: 24-29.
11. Falke JJ, Hazelbauer GL (2001) Transmembrane signaling in bacterial chemoreceptors. Trends Biochem Sci 26: 257-265.
12. Sourjik V (2004) Receptor clustering and signal processing in E. coli chemotaxis. Trends Microbiol 12: 569-576.
13. Wadhams GH, Armitage JP (2004) Making sense of it all: bacterial chemotaxis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5: 1024-1037.
14. Clark DA, Grant LC (2005) The bacterial chemotactic response reflects a compromise between transient and steady-state behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 9150-9155.
15. Vladimirov N, Løvdok L, Lebiedz D, Sourjik V (2008) Dependence of bacterial chemotaxis on gradient shape and adaptation rate. PLoS Comput Biol 4: e1000242.
16. Vladimirov N, Sourjik V (2009) Chemotaxis: how bacteria use memory. Biol Chem 390: 1097-1104.
17. Emonet T, Cluzel P (2008) Relationship between cellular response and behavioral variability in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 3304-3309.
18. Zonia L, Bray D (2009) Swimming patterns and dynamics of simulated Escherichia coli bacteria. J R Soc Interface 6: 1035-1046.
19. Andrews BW, Yi TM, Iglesias PA (2006) Optimal noise filtering in the chemotactic response of Escherichia coli. PLoS Comput Biol 2: e154.
20. Tu Y, Shimizu TS, Berg HC (2008) Modeling the chemotactic response of Escherichia coli to time-varying stimuli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 14855-14860.
21. Bray D, Levin MD, Morton-Firth CJ (1998) Receptor clustering as a cellular mechanism to control sensitivity. Nature 393: 85-88.
22. Kentner D, Sourjik V (2009) Dynamic map of protein interactions in the Escherichia coli chemotaxis pathway. Mol Syst Biol 5: 238.
23. Sourjik V, Berg HC (2002) Receptor sensitivity in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 123-127.
24. Sourjik V, Berg HC (2004) Functional interactions between receptors in bacterial chemotaxis. Nature 428: 437-441.
25. Chalah A, Weis RM (2005) Site-specific and synergistic stimulation of methylation on the bacterial chemotaxis receptor Tsr by serine and CheW. BMC Microbiol 5: 12.
26. Koshland DE (1981) Biochemistry of sensing and adaptation in a simple bacterial system. Ann Rev Biochem 50: 765-782.
27. Li Z, Stock JB (2009) Protein carboxyl methylation and the biochemistry of memory. Biol Chem 390: 1087-1096.
28. Alon U, Surette MG, Barkai N, Leibler S (1999) Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis. Nature 397: 168-171.
29. Berg HC, Brown DA (1972) Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli analysed by threedimensional tracking. Nature 239: 500-504.
30. Lai WC, Barnakova LA, Barnakov AN, Hazelbauer GL (2006) Similarities and differences in interactions of the activity-enhancing chemoreceptor pentapeptide with the two enzymes of adaptational modification. J Bacteriol 188: 5646-5649.
31. Li M, Hazelbauer GL (2006) The carboxyl-terminal linker is important for chemoreceptor function. Mol Microbiol 60: 469-479.
32. Toews ML, Goy MF, Springer MS, Adler J (1979) Attractants and repellents control demethylation of methylated chemotaxis proteins in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 76: 5544-5548.
33. Li M, Hazelbauer GL (2005) Adaptational assistance in clusters of bacterial chemoreceptors. Mol Microbiol 56: 1617-1626.
34. Li M, Hazelbauer GL (2004) Cellular stoichiometry of the components of the chemotaxis signaling complex. J Bacteriol 186: 3687-3694.
35. Simms SA, Stock AM, Stock JB (1987) Purification and characterization of the S-adenosylmethionine: glutamyl methyltransferase that modifies membrane chemoreceptor proteins in bacteria. J Biol Chem 262: 8537-8543.
36. Lai WC, Hazelbauer GL (2005) Carboxyl-terminal extensions beyond the conserved pentapeptide reduce rates of chemoreceptor adaptational modification. J Bacteriol 187: 5115-5121.
37. Kort EN, Goy MF, Larsen SH, Adler J (1975) Methylation of a membrane protein involved in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 72: 3939-3943.
38. Chelsky D, Gutterson NI, Koshland DE (1984) A diffusion assay for detection and quantitation of methyl-esterified proteins on polyacrylamide gels. Anal Biochem 141: 143-148.
39. Wu J, Li J, Li G, Long DG, Weis RM (1996) The receptor binding site for the methyltransferase of bacterial chemotaxis is distinct from the sites of methylation. Biochemistry 35: 4984-4993.
40. Barnakov AN, Barnakova LA, Hazelbauer GL (2002) Allosteric enhancement of adaptational demethylation by a carboxyl-terminal sequence on chemoreceptors. J Biol Chem 277: 42151-42156.
41. Endres RG, Oleksiuk O, Hansen CH, Meir Y, Sourjik V, et al. (2008) Variable sizes of Escherichia coli chemoreceptor signaling teams. Mol Syst Biol 4: 211.
42. Endres RG, Wingreen NS (2006) Precise adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis through "assistance neighborhoods". Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 13040-13044.
43. Keymer JE, Endres RG, Skoge M, Meir Y, Wingreen NS (2006) Chemosensing in Escherichia coli: two regimes of two-state receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 1786-1791.
44. Mello BA, Tu Y (2005) An allosteric model for heterogeneous receptor complexes: understanding bacterial chemotaxis responses to multiple stimuli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 17354-17359.
45. Barkai N, Leibler S (1997) Robustness in simple biochemical networks. Nature 387: 913-917.
46. Mello BA, Tu Y (2003) Perfect and near-perfect adaptation in a model of bacterial chemotaxis. Biophys J 84: 2943-2956.
47. Yi T, Huang Y, Simon MI, Doyle J (2000) Robust perfect adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis through integral feedback control. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97: 4649-4653.
48. Kollmann M, Løvdok L, Bartholome K, Timmer J, Sourjik V (2005) Design principles of a bacterial signalling network. Nature 438: 504-507.
49. Hansen CH, Endres RG, Wingreen NS (2008) Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli: a molecular model for robust precise adaptation. PLoS Comput Biol 4: e1.
50. Ursell T, Huang KC, Peterson E, Phillips R (2007) Cooperative Gating and Spatial Organization of Membrane Proteins through Elastic Interactions. PLoS Comput Biol 3: e81.
51. Gurry T, Kahramanogullar, Endres RG (2009) Biophysical Mechanism for Ras- Nanocluster Formation and Signaling in Plasma Membrane. PLoS ONE 4: e6148.
52. Mello BA, Tu Y (2007) Effects of adaptation in maintaining high sensitivity over a wide range of backgrounds for Escherichia coli chemotaxis. Biophys J 92: 2329-2337.
53. Kalinin YV, Jiang L, Tu Y, Wu M (2009) Logarithmic sensing in Escherichia coli bacterial chemotaxis. Biophys J 96: 2439-2448.
54. Duke TAJ, Bray D (1999) Heightened sensitivity of a lattice of membrane receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96: 10104-10108.
55. Mello BA, Tu Y (2003) Quantitative modeling of sensitivity in bacterial chemotaxis: The role of coupling among different chemoreceptor species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 8223-8228.
56. Goldman JP, Levin MD, Bray D (2009) Signal amplification in a lattice of coupled protein kinases. Mol BioSyst 5: 1853-1859.
57. Skoge ML, Endres RG, Wingreen NS (2006) Receptor-receptor coupling in bacterial chemotaxis: evidence for strongly coupled clusters. Biophys J 90: 4317-4326.
58. Anand GS, Goudreau PN, Stock AM (1998) Activation of methylesterase CheB: evidence of a dual role for the regulatory domain. Biochemistry 37: 14038-14047.
59. Kalinin Y, Neumann S, Sourjik V, Wu M (2010) Responses of Escherichia coli bacteria to two opposing chemoattractant gradients depend on the chemoreceptor ratio. J Bacteriol 192: 1796-1800.
60. Sourjik V, Vaknin A, Shimizu TS, Berg HC (2007) In vivo measurement by FRET of pathway activity in bacterial chemotaxis. Methods Enzymol 423: 363-391.