Picturing Generosity: Explaining the Success of National Campaigns in the Netherlands

Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 262-284

  Wiepking, Pamala ^a   van Leeuwen, Marco H D ^b  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

fundraising; giving; national campaigns; philanthropy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875652898     PISSN: 08997640     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0899764012474899     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Abrams B. A.,Schmitz M. D.The "crowding-out" effect of governmental transfers on private charitable contributions: Cross-section evidence.National Tax Journal. 1984;37:563-568.
2. Adams W. C.Testing geographical bias in international news. Whose lives count? TV coverage of natural disasters.Journal of Communication. 1986;36 (2): 113-123.
3. Andreoni J.Privately provided public goods in a large economy: The limits of altruism.Journal of Public Economics. 1988;35 (1): 57-73.
4. Andreoni J.Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving.Economic Journal. 1990;100:464-477.
5. Bax E. H.Modernization and cleavage in Dutch society. A study of long term economic and social change. Groningen: University of Groningen; 1988:.
6. Bekkers R.Trust, accreditation, and philanthropy in the Netherlands.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2003;32:596-615.
7. Bekkers R.,Schuyt T.And who is your neighbor? Explaining denominational differences in charitable giving and volunteering in the Netherlands.Review of Religious Research. 2008;50 (1): 74-96.
8. Bekkers R.,Wiepking P.A literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy: Eight mechanisms that drive charitable giving.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2011;40:924-973.
9. Bennett R.,Kottasz R.Emergency fund-raising for disaster relief.Disaster Prevention and Management. 2000;9:352-360.
10. Breeze B.,Morgan G. Paper presented at the NCVO/VSSN Researching the Voluntary Sector Conference; 2009Warwick University, UK; 2009.
11. Brooks A. C.Do public subsidies leverage private philanthropy for the arts? Empirical evidence on symphony orchestras.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 1999;28 (1): 32-45.
12. StatLine databank: Consumenten prijs index. Voorburg, Netherlands: Author; 2011a:.
13. StatLine databank: Historie nationale rekeningen. Voorburg, Netherlands: Author; 2011b:.
14. StatLine databank: Bevolking, islamieten en hindoes in Nederland. Voorburg, Netherlands: Author; 2012:.
15. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). (2012). The world factbook. Retrieved from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/nl.html#.
16. Constant J. G.Documentaire 20ste eeuw: Kroniek en aanzien van onze tijd. Zwolle, Overijssel, Netherlands: Waanders; 1993:.
17. DietzH. G. (1999). Gehandicaptenzorg in Nederland. Het dorp. Het ontstaan van woonvormen voor mensen met een lichamelijke handicap [Care of the disabled in the Netherlands]. Retrieved from http://www.kanvanalles.nl/geschiedenis/Deel16.htm.
18. Glazer A.,Konrad K. A.A signaling explanation for charity.American Economic Review. 1996;86:1019-1028.
19. Harbaugh W. T.What do donations buy? A model of philanthropy based on prestige and warm glow.Journal of Public Economics. 1998;67:269-284.
20. Horne C. S.,Johnson J. L.,Van Slyke D. M.Do charitable donors know enough-and care enough-about government subsidies to affect private giving to nonprofit organizations?.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2005;34 (1): 136-149.
21. Kinnick K. N.,Krugman D. M.,Cameron G. T.Compassion fatigue: Communication and burnout toward social problems.Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly. 1996;73:687-707.
22. Handleiding LexisNexis academic. Amsterdam, Netherlands: LexisNexis; 2006:.
23. Meijer M.-M.,Bekkers R.,Schuyt T.Tsunami en internationale hulp: De gevers in kaart gebracht. Amsterdam, Netherlands: National Committee for Sustainable Development (NCDO); 2005:.
24. Miller D. T.Altruism and threat to a belief in a just world.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 1977;13 (2): 113-124.
25. Marathon radio- en tv campagne "Open het dorp. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Author; 1962:.
26. Peeters A.,Jager R.,Kalfs N.Wie kijkt? De meting achter de kijkcijfers. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Boom onderwijs; 2005:.
27. Salamon L. M.,Anheier H. K.Social origins of civil society: Explaining the nonprofit sector cross-nationally.Voluntas. 1998;9 (3): 213-248.
28. Schervish P. G.Major donors, major motives: The people and purposes behind major gifts.New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising. 2005;47:59-87.
29. Simon A. F.Television news and international earthquake relief.Journal of Communication. 1997;47 (3): 82-93.
30. Steinberg R.Does government spending crowd out donations?.Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics. 1991;62:591-612.
31. van Asbeck G.Aandacht voor rampen moet beter verdeeld.NRC Handelsblad. 1999;:2.
32. van Leeuwen M. H. D.Logic of charity: Amsterdam, 1800-1850. Basingstoke, England: Pallgrave Macmillan; 2000:.
33. van Leeuwen M. H. D.Giving in early modern history: Philanthropy in Amsterdam's golden age.Continuity and Change. 2012;27:301-343.
34. van Leeuwen M. H. D.,Wiepking P.National campaigns for charitable causes: A literature review.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2012;:.
35. Vamstad J.,von Essen J.Charitable Giving in a Universal Welfare State -Charity and Social Rights in Sweden.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2013;42:285-301.
36. Wiepking P.,Bekkers R.Does who decides really matter? Causes and consequences of personal financial management in the case of larger and structural charitable donations.Voluntas. 2010;21:240-263.
37. Wiepking P.,Breeze B.Feeling poor, acting stingy: The effect of money perceptions on charitable giving.International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing. 2012;17 (1): 13-24.
38. Wiepking P.,Heijnen M.The giving standard. Conditional cooperation in the case of charitable giving.International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing. 2011;16 (11): 13-22.