Toward task-dependent evaluation of web-QoE: Free exploration vs. "who Ate What? "

2012 IEEE Globecom Workshops, GC Wkshps 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1309-1313

  Strohmeier, Dominik ^a   Jumisko Pyykko, Satu ^b   Raake, Alexander ^a  

^a TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE; DELAY SENSITIVE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES; INFORMATION PRESENTATION; LOAD DURATION; QUALITY EVALUATION; QUALITY OF EXPERIENCE (QOE); USER SATISFACTION;

QUALITY CONTROL; WEB SERVICES; WEBSITES;

QUALITY OF SERVICE;

EID: 84875644359     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/GLOCOMW.2012.6477771     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. J. Nielsen, "Website Response Times," Alertbox, June 2010. [Online]. Available: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/response-times.html
2. Gomez Inc., "When Seconds Count: National Consumer Survey on Websites and Mobile Performance Expectations," accessed April 13th, 2012. [Online]. Available: http://www.gomez.com/wp-content/downloads/ GomezWebSpeedSurvey.pdf
3. "The Need for Speed," accessed April 13th, 2012. [Online]. Available: http://www.technologyreview.com/files/54902/GoogleSpeed-charts.pdf
4. N. Bhatti, A. Bouch, and A. Kuchinsky, "Integrating user-perceived quality into web server design," in Proceedings of the 9th international World Wide Web conference on Computer networks: the international journal of computer and telecommunications netowrking. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, The Netherlands: North-Holland Publishing Co., 2000, pp. 1-16. [Online]. Available: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=347319.346245
5. T. Hossfeld, S. Biedermann, R. Schatz, A. Platzer, S. Egger, and M. Fiedler, "The memory effect and its implications on Web QoE modeling," in Proc. 23rd Int. Teletraffic Congress (ITC), 2011, pp. 103-110.
6. ITU Recommendation ITU-T G.1030, Estimating End-To-End Performance in IP Networks for Data Applications, ITU Telecom. Standardization Sector of ITU, Geneva, Switzerland, 2005.
7. R. Schatz, S. Egger, and A. Platzer, "Poor, Good Enough or Even Better? Bridging the Gap between Acceptability and QoE of Mobile Broadband Data Services," in Proc. IEEE Int Communications (ICC) Conf, 2011, pp. 1-6.
8. R. Schatz and S. Egger, "Vienna surfing: assessing mobile broadband quality in the field," in Proceedings of the first ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Measurements up the stack, ser. W-MUST '11. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2011, pp. 19-24. [Online]. Available: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2018602.2018608
9. S. Egger, P. Reichl, T. Hoßfeld, and R. Schatz, "Time is Bandwidth? Narrowing the Gap between Subjective Time Perception and Quality of Experience," in 2012 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC 2012), Ottawa, Canada, Jun. 2012.
10. P. Reichl, S. Egger, R. Schatz, and A. D'Alconzo, "The Logarithmic Nature of QoE and the Role of the Weber-Fechner Law in QoE Assessment," in Proc. IEEE Int Communications (ICC) Conf, 2010, pp. 1-5.
11. L. Gros and N. Chateau, "Instantaneous and Overall Judgements for Time-Varying Speech Quality: Assessments and Relationships," Acta Acustica united with Acustica, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 367-377, 2001. (Pubitemid 32699292)
12. A. Ninassi, O. Le Meur, P. Le Callet, and D. Barba, "Considering Temporal Variations of Spatial Visual Distortions in Video Quality Assessment," IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, vol. 3, pp. 253-265, 2009.
13. European Network on Quality of Experience in Multimedia Systems and Services (COST Action IC 1003), "Qualinet White Paper on Definitions of Quality of Experience," Le Callet, P., Möller, S., and Perkis, A. (eds.), Lausanne, Switzerland, Version 1.1, June 2012.
14. D. F. Galletta, R. M. Henry, S. McCoy, and P. Polak, "When the Wait Isn't So Bad: The Interacting Effects of Website Delay, Familiarity, and Breadth," Information Systems Research, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 20-37, 2006. (Pubitemid 43450177)
15. ITU Recommendation ITU-T P.910, Subjective Video Quality Assessment Methods for Multimedia Applications, ITU Telecom. Standardization Sector of ITU, Geneva, Switzerland, 1999.
16. H. Coolican, Research methods and statistics in psychology. London: J. W. Arrowsmith Ltd, 2004, vol. 4.
17. E. H. Weber, "De Pulsu, Resorptione, Auditu Et Tactu," in Annotationes Anatomicae Et Physiologicae. Koehler, 1834.
18. ISO 9241-11-1998, Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs): Part 11. Guidance on usability., International Organization for Standardization, 1998.
19. K. Hornbæk and E. L.-C. Law, "Meta-analysis of correlations among usability measures," in Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ser. CHI '07. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2007, pp. 617-626. (Pubitemid 47581650)