Modeling soil electrical conductivity-depth relationships with data from proximal and penetrating ECa sensors

Geoderma

Volumn 199, Issue , 2013, Pages 12-21

  Sudduth, Kenneth A ^a   Myers, D Brenton ^a   Kitchen, Newell R ^a   Drummond, Scott T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

Claypan; Electrical conductivity; Model inversion; Penetrometer; Topsoil depth

Indexed keywords

CLAYPAN; ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY; MODEL INVERSION; PENETROMETER; TOPSOIL DEPTH;

CALIBRATION; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; SENSORS;

SOILS;

BULK DENSITY; CALIBRATION; CLAY SOIL; CROPPING PRACTICE; ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY; GRASS; NUMERICAL MODEL; PARAMETERIZATION; PENETROMETER; PERENNIAL PLANT; SALINE SOIL; SENSOR; SOIL ANALYSIS; SOIL HORIZON; SOIL PROFILE; TOPSOIL;

MISSOURI; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84875640130     PISSN: 00167061     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Adamchuk V.I., Viscarra Rossel R.A., Marx D.B., Samal A.K. Using targeted sampling to process multivariate soil sensing data. Geoderma 2011, 163:63-73.
2. Barker R.D. Depth of investigation of collinear symmetrical four-electrode arrays. Geophysics 1989, 54:1031-1037.
3. Beamish D. Low induction number, ground conductivity meters: a correction procedure in the absence of magnetic effects. Journal of Applied Geophysics 2011, 75:244-253.
4. Borchers B., Uram T., Hendrickx J.M.H. Tikhonov regularization of electrical conductivity depth profiles in field soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 1997, 61:1004-1009.
5. Bork E.W., West N.E., Doolittle J.A., Boettinger J.L. Soil depth assessment of sagebrush grazing treatments using electromagnetic induction. Journal of Range Management 1998, 51:469-474.
6. Callegary J.B., Ferre T.P.A., Groom R.W. Vertical spatial sensitivity and exploration depth of low-induction-number electromagnetic-induction instruments. Vadose Zone Journal 2007, 6:158-167.
7. Callegary J.B., Ferre T.P.A., Groom R.W. Three-dimensional sensitivity distribution and sample volume of low-induction-number electromagnetic-induction instruments. Soil Science Society of America Journal 2012, 76:85-91.
8. Chaudhary V.P., Sudduth K.A., Kitchen N.R., Kremer R.J. Reflectance spectroscopy detects management and landscape differences in soil carbon and nitrogen. Soil Science Society of America Journal 2012, 76:597-606.
9. Cockx L., Van Meirvenne M., De Vos B. Using the EM38DD soil sensor to delineate clay lenses in a sandy forest soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal 2007, 71:1314-1322.
10. Cook P.G., Walker G.R. Depth profiles of electrical conductivity from linear combinations of electromagnetic induction measurements. Soil Science Society of America Journal 1992, 56:1015-1022.
11. Corwin D.L., Lesch S.M. Apparent soil electrical conductivity measurements in agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 2005, 46:11-43.
12. Doolittle J.A., Sudduth K.A., Kitchen N.R., Indorante S.J. Estimating depths to claypans using electromagnetic induction methods. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 1994, 49:572-575.
13. Doolittle J., Peterson M., Wheeler T. Comparison of two electromagnetic induction tools in salinity appraisals. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 2001, 56:257-262.
14. Dualem, Inc. DUALEM-1S and DUALEM-2S User's Manual 2005, Dualem, Inc., Milton, Ontario.
15. Ghidey F., Blanchard P.E., Lerch R.N., Kitchen N.R., Alberts E.E., Sadler E.J. Measurement and simulation of herbicide transport from the corn phase of three cropping systems. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 2005, 60:260-273.
16. Hendrickx J.M.H., Borchers B., Corwin D.L., Lesch S.M., Hilgendorf A.C., Schlue J. Inversion of soil conductivity profiles from electromagnetic induction measurements: theory and experimental verification. Soil Science Society of America Journal 2002, 66:673-685.
17. Jung K.Y., Kitchen N.R., Sudduth K.A., Lee K.S., Chung S.O. Soil compaction varies by crop management system over a claypan soil landscape. Soil and Tillage Research 2010, 107:1-10.
18. Kitchen N.R., Sudduth K.A., Drummond S.T. Mapping of sand deposition from 1993 Midwest floods with electromagnetic induction measurements. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 1996, 51:336-340.
19. Kitchen N.R., Sudduth K.A., Drummond S.T. Soil electrical conductivity as a crop productivity measure for claypan soils. Journal of Production Agriculture 1999, 12:607-617.
20. Kweon G.Y., Lund E., Maxton C., Drummond P., Jensen K. Soil profile measurement of carbon contents using a probe-type VIS-NIR spectrometer. Journal of Biosystems Engineering 2009, 34:382-389.
21. Lesch S.M. Sensor-directed spatial response surface sampling designs for characterizing spatial variation in soil properties. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 2005, 46:153-180.
22. Lesch S.M., Corwin D.L. Using the dual-pathway parallel conductance model to determine how different soil properties influence conductivity survey data. Agronomy Journal 2003, 95:365-379.
23. McNeill J.D. Electromagnetic terrain conductivity measurement at low induction numbers. Tech. Note TN-6 1980, Geonics Ltd., Mississauga, Ontario.
24. McNeill J.D. Rapid, accurate mapping of soil salinity by electromagnetic ground conductivity meters. Advances in Measurement of Soil Physical Properties: Bringing Theory Into Practice, Spec. Pub. 1992, 30:209-229. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin.
25. McNeill J.D. Why doesn't Geonics Limited build a multi-frequency EM31 or EM38?. Tech. Note TN-30 1996, Geonics Ltd., Mississauga, Ontario.
26. Mester A., van der Kruk J., Zimmermann E., Vereecken H. Quantitative two-layer conductivity inversion of multi-configuration electromagnetic induction instruments. Vadose Zone Journal 2011, 10:1319-1330.
27. Monteiro Santos F.A., Triantafilis J., Bruzgulis K.E., Roe J.A.E. Inversion of multiconfiguration electromagnetic (DUALEM-421) profiling data using a one-dimensional laterally constrained algorithm. Vadose Zone Journal 2010, 9:117-125.
28. Mueller T.G., Hartsock N.J., Stombaugh T.S., Shearer S.A., Cornelius P.L., Barnhisel R.I. Soil electrical conductivity map variability in limestone soils overlain by loess. Agronomy Journal 2003, 95:496-507.
29. Myers D.B., Kitchen N.R., Sudduth K.A., Grunwald S., Miles R.J., Sadler E.J., Udawatta R. Combining proximal and penetrating soil electrical conductivity sensors for high resolution digital soil mapping. Proximal Soil Sensing 2010, 233-243. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands. R.A. Viscarra Rossel, A.B. McBratney, B. Minasny (Eds.).
30. Rhoades J.D., Manteghi N.A., Shrouse P.J., Alves W.J. Soil electrical conductivity and soil salinity: new formulations and calibrations. Soil Science Society of America Journal 1989, 53:433-439.
31. Roy A., Apparao A. Depth of investigation in direct current methods. Geophysics 1971, 36:943-959.
32. Saey T., Simpson D., Vitharana U.W.A., Vermeersch H., Vermang J., Van Meirvenne M. Reconstructing the paleotopography beneath the loess cover with the aid of an electromagnetic induction sensor. Catena 2008, 74:58-64.
33. Saey T., Simpson D., Vermeersch H., Cockx L., Van Meirvenne M. Comparing the EM38DD and DUALEM-21S sensors for depth-to-clay mapping. Soil Science Society of America Journal 2009, 73:7-12.
34. Sudduth K.A., Drummond S.T., Kitchen N.R. Accuracy issues in electromagnetic induction sensing of soil electrical conductivity for precision agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 2001, 31:239-264.
35. Sudduth K.A., Kitchen N.R., Bollero G.A., Bullock D.G., Wiebold W.J. Comparison of electromagnetic induction and direct sensing of soil electrical conductivity. Agronomy Journal 2003, 95:472-482.
36. Sudduth K.A., Hummel J.W., Drummond S.T. Comparison of the Veris Profiler 3000 to an ASAE-standard penetrometer. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 2004, 20:535-541.
37. Sudduth K.A., Kitchen N.R., Wiebold W.J., Batchelor W.D., Bollero G.A., Bullock D.G., Clay D.E., Palm H.L., Pierce F.J., Schuler R.T., Thelen K.D. Relating apparent electrical conductivity to soil properties across the north-central USA. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 2005, 46:263-283.
38. Sudduth K.A., Kitchen N.R., Myers D.B., Drummond S.T. Mapping depth to argillic soil horizons using apparent electrical conductivity. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics 2010, 15:135-146.
39. Triantafilis J., Monteiro Santos F.A. Resolving the spatial distribution of the true electrical conductivity with depth using EM38 and EM31 signal data and a laterally constrained inversion model. Australian Journal of Soil Research 2010, 48:434-446.
40. Tromp-van Meerveld H.J., McDonnell J.J. Assessment of multi-frequency electromagnetic induction for determining soil moisture patterns at the hillslope scale. Journal of Hydrology 2009, 368:56-67.
41. USDA-NRCS Soil taxonomy: a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. USDA Handbook 1999, 436. USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, D.C. 2nd edition.
42. USDA-NRCS Land resources regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. USDA Handbook 2006, 296. USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, D.C.
43. Williams B.G., Baker G.C. An electromagnetic induction technique for reconnaissance surveys of soil salinity hazards. Australian Journal of Soil Research 1982, 20:107-118.
44. Won I.J., Keiswetter D.A., Fields G.R.A., Sutton L.C. GEM-2: a new multifrequency electromagnetic sensor. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics 1996, 1:129-137.