Three-dimensional sensitivity distribution and sample volume of low-induction-number electromagnetic-induction instruments

Soil Science Society of America Journal

Volumn 76, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 85-91

  Callegary, James B ^a   Ferré, Ty P A ^b   Groom, R W ^c  

^a U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^c PetRos EiKon Inc   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSOLUTE VALUES; ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY; HOMOGENEOUS SOIL; SAMPLE VOLUME; SENSITIVITY DISTRIBUTIONS; SMALL PERTURBATIONS; SOIL ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY; SOIL PROPERTY; SPATIAL SENSITIVITY; TRANSMITTER AND RECEIVER;

ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTROMAGNETISM; SOILS; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

INSTRUMENTS;

CORRELATION; ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTROMAGNETIC METHOD; HETEROGENEITY; MEASUREMENT METHOD; NUMERICAL MODEL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SOIL PROFILE; SOIL SURVEY; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING;

EID: 84855435653     PISSN: 03615995     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2011.0003     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Abdu, H., D. A. Robinson, M. Seyfried, and S. B. Jones. 2008. Geophysical imaging of watershed subsurface patterns and prediction of soil texture and water holding capacity. Water Resour. Res. 44, W00D18, doi: 101029/2008WR007043.
2. Archie, G. E. 1942. The electric resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Trans. Am. Inst. Min. Metall. Pet. Eng. 146:54-62.
3. Buchanan, S., and J. Triantafilis. 2009. Mapping water table depth using geophysical and environmental variables. Ground Water 47:80-96. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.2008.00490.x
4. Callegary, J. B., T. P. A. Ferré, and R. W. Groom. 2007a. Vertical spatial sensitivity and exploration depth of low-induction-number frequency-domain electromagnetic instruments. Vadose Zone J. 6:158-167. doi:10.2136/vzj2006.0120 (Pubitemid 47252336)
5. Callegary, J. B., J. M. Leenhouts, N. V. Paretti, and C. A. Jones. 2007b. Rapid estimation of recharge potential in ephemeral stream channels using electromagnetic methods, and measurements of channel and vegetation characteristics. J. Hydrol. 344:17-31. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.06.028 (Pubitemid 47362140)
6. Corwin, D. L., and S. M. Lesch. 2005. Characterizing soil spatial variability with apparent soil electrical conductivity. Part II. Case study. Comput. Electron. Agric. 46:135-152. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2004.11.003 (Pubitemid 40257068)
7. Dhar, R. L. 1972. Studies on investigation characteristics of electromagnetic and electrical prospecting systems, and interpretation of vertical gravity and magnetic profiles in boreholes and shafts: Ph. D. Thesis, Banaras Hindu University.
8. Ferré, T. P. A., D. L. Rudolph, and R. G. Kachanoski. 1996. Spatial averaging of water content by time domain reflectometry: Implications for twin rod probes with and without dielectric coatings. Water Resour. Res. 32:271-279. doi:10.1029/95WR02576 (Pubitemid 26309855)
9. Friedman, S. P. 2005. Soil properties influencing apparent electrical conductivity: A review. Comput. Electron. Agric. 46:45-70. doi:10.1016/j.compag. 2004.11.001 (Pubitemid 40257066)
10. Furman, A., T. P. A. Ferré, and A. W. Warrick. 2003. A Sensitivity analysis of electrical-resistance-tomography array types using analytical element modeling. Vadose Zone J. 2:416-423.
11. Furman, A., T. P. A. Ferré, and A. W. Warrick. 2004. Optimization of ERT Survey for rapid hydrological measurement using perturbation sensitivity approach and genetic algorithm. Vadose Zone J. 3:1230-1239.
12. Habashy, T. M., R. W. Groom, and B. R. Spies. 1993. Beyond the Born and Rytov approximations: A nonlinear approach to electromagnetic scattering. J. Geophys. Res. 98:1759-1775. doi:10.1029/92JB02324 (Pubitemid 23390548)
13. Hendrickx, J. M. H., B. Borchers, D. L. Corwin, S. M. Lesch, A. C. Hilgendorf, and J. Schlue. 2002. Inversion of soil conductivity profiles from electromagnetic induction measurements: Theory and experimental verification. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 66:673-685. doi:10.2136/sssaj2002.0673 (Pubitemid 34463546)
14. Jain, N., L. S. Riggs, and B. Selfridge. 2007. Electromagnetic induction (EMI) coil sensitivity and streamline maps for evaluating transmitting coil designs and configurations used in the geophysical detection of unexploded ordnance (UXO). 20th Annual SAGEEP Symposium, Denver, CO.
15. Kaufman, A. A., and G. V. Keller. 1983. Frequency and transient soundings: Elsevier, location.
16. McNeill, J. D. 1980a. Electrical conductivity of soils and rocks: Tech. Note TN-5: Geonics Limited, Mississauga, ON. Available online at http://geonics.com/html/technicalnotes.html. (verified 19 Sept. 2011).
17. McNeill, J. D. 1980b. Electromagnetic terrain conductivity measurement at low induction numbers: Technical Note TN-6: Geonics Limited, Mississauga, ON. Available online at http://geonics.com/html/technicalnotes.html. (verified 19 Sept. 2011).
18. Reid, R. E., Pfaffling, A., and Vrbancich, J. 2006. Airborne electromagnetic footprints in 1D earths. Geophysics 71: G63-G72. 10.1190/1.2187756
19. Revil, A., L. M. Cathles, S. Losh, and J. A. Nunn. 1998. Electrical conductivity in shaly sands with geophysical applications. J. Geophys. Res. 103: B10 10.1029/98JB02125. doi:10.1029/98JB02125
20. Robinson, D. A., I. Lebron, B. Kocar, K. Phan, M. Sampson, N. Crook, and S. Fendorf. 2009. Time-lapse geophysical imaging of soil moisture dynamics in tropical deltaic soils: An aid to interpreting hydrological and geochemical processes. Water Resour. Res. 45: W00D32 10.1029/2008WR006984. doi:10.1029/2008WR006984
21. Schwalenberg, K., V. Rath, and V. Haak. 2002. Sensitivity studies applied to a two-dimensional resistivity model from the Central Andes. Geophys. J. Int. 150:673-686. doi:10.1046/j.1365-246X.2002.01734.x (Pubitemid 34996039)
22. Sudduth, K. A., N. R. Kitchen, G. A. Bollero, D. G. Bullock, and W. J. Wiebold. 2003. Comparison of electromagnetic induction and direct sensing of soil electrical conductivity. Agron. J. 95:472-482. doi:10.2134/agronj2003.0472 (Pubitemid 36684793)
23. Tølbøll, R. J., and N. B. Christensen. 2007. Sensitivity functions of frequencydomain magnetic dipole-dipole systems. Geophysics 72: F45-F56. doi:10.1190/1.2409623 (Pubitemid 46403863)
24. Triantafilis, J., and F. A. Monteiro-Santos. 2010. Resolving the spatial distribution of the true electrical conductivity with depth using EM38 and EM31 signal data and a laterally constrained inversion model. Aust. J. Soil Res. 48:434-446. doi:10.1071/SR09149
25. Wait, J. R. 1962. Electromagnetic waves in stratified media. Pergamon Press, location, Oxford, UK.
26. Zhu, Q., and H. S. Lin. 2009. Simulation and validation of concentrated subsurface lateral flow paths in an agricultural landscape. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 13:1503-1518. doi:10.5194/hess-13-1503-2009