The effect of LACE DVD training in new and experienced hearing aid users

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 214-230

  Olson, Anne D ^a   Preminger, Jill E ^b   Shinn, Jennifer B ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b University of Louisville School of Medicine   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory training; Hearing aids; Home training; Older adult; Speech in noise

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; APTITUDE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE DURATION; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEARING AID; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; LISTENING AND COMMUNICATION ENHANCEMENT; MALE; NOISE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PERCEPTION; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TRAINING;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CORRECTION OF HEARING IMPAIRMENT; FEMALE; HEARING AIDS; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NOISE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; SPEECH PERCEPTION; THERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VIDEOTAPE RECORDING;

EID: 84875617444     PISSN: 10500545     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.24.3.7     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. American National Standards Institute [ANSI]. (1996) American National Standard Specification for Audiometers, S3.6. New York American National Standards Institute.
2. Bentler RA, Niebuhr DP, Getta JP, Anderson CV. (1993) Longitudinal study of hearing aid effectiveness. I: Objective measures. J Speech Hear Res 36(4):808-819.
3. Bode DL, Oyer HJ. (1970) Auditory training and speech discrimination. J Speech Hear Res 13(4):839-855.
4. Burk MH, Humes LE. (2007) Effects of training on speech recognition performance in noise using lexically hard words. J Speech Lang Hear Res 50(1):25-40.
5. Burk MH, Humes LE. (2008) Effects of long-term training on aided speech-recognition performance in noise in older adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res 51(3):759-771.
6. Burk MH, Humes LE, Amos NE, Strauser LE. (2006) Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal- hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners. Ear Hear 27(3):263-278.
7. Chisolm TH, Abrams HB, McArdle R. (2004) Short- and long-term outcomes of adult audiological rehabilitation. Ear Hear 25(5):464-477.
8. Chisolm TH, Johnson CE, Danhauer JL, et al. (2007) A systematic review of health-related quality of life and hearing aids: final report of the American Academy of Audiology Task Force on the Health-Related Quality of Life Benefits of Amplification in Adults. J Am Acad Audiol 18(2):151-183.
9. Cohen J. (1992) A power primer. Psychol Bull 112(1):155-159.
10. Cord MT, Leek MR, Walden BE. (2000) Speech recognition ability in noise and its relationship to perceived hearing aid benefit.JAm Acad Audiol 11(9):475-483.
11. Cox RM, Alexander GC. (1992) Maturation of hearing aid benefit: objective and subjective measurements. Ear Hear 13(3):131-141.
12. Cox RM, Alexander GC. (2002) The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): psychometric properties of the English version. Int J Audiol 41(1):30-35.
13. CoxRM, AlexanderGC, Beyer CM. (2003) Norms for the international outcome inventory for hearing aids.JAmAcadAudiol 14(8):403-413.
14. Crandell CC. (1991) Individual differences in speech recognition ability: implications for hearing aid selection. Ear Hear 12(6, Suppl.):100S-108S.
15. Department of Veterans Affairs. (1998) Tonal and Speech Materials for Auditory Perceptual Assessment (2.0). Mountain Home, TN: VA Medical Center.
16. Dillon H. (1999) NAL-NL1: a new procedure for fitting non-linear hearing aids. Hear J 52:10-16.
17. Dubno JR, Dirks DD. (1983) Suggestions for optimizing reliability with the synthetic sentence identification test. J Speech Hear Disord 48(1):98-103.
18. Gatehouse S. (1992) The time course and magnitude of perceptual acclimatization to frequency responses: evidence from monaural fitting of hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am 92(3):1258-1268.
19. Gatehouse S. (1993) Role of perceptual acclimatization in the selection of frequency responses for hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 4(5):296-306.
20. Gatehouse S. (1994) Components and determinants of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear 15(1):30-49.
21. Gatehouse S, Noble W. (2004) The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol 43(2):85-99.
22. Hickson L, Scarinci N. (2007) Older adults with acquired hearing impairment: applying the ICF in rehabilitation. Semin Speech Lang 28(4):283-290.
23. Humes LE, Burk MH, Strauser LE, Kinney DL. (2009) Development and efficacy of a frequent-word auditory training protocol for older adults with impaired hearing. Ear Hear 30(5):613-627.
24. Jenstad LM, Souza PE. (2007) Temporal envelope changes of compression and speech rate: combined effects on recognition for older adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res 50(5):1123-1138.
25. Kappel V, Moreno AC, Buss CH. (2011) Plasticity of the auditory system: theoretical considerations. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 77(5):670-674.
26. Killion MC, Niquette PA, Gudmundsen GI, Revit LJ, Banerjee S. (2004) Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 116(4, Pt. 1):2395-2405.
27. Kochkin S. (2002) MarkeTrak VI: 10 year customer satisfaction trends in the US hearing instrument market. Hear Rev 9:14-46.
28. Kochkin S. (2005) MarkeTrak VII: customer satisfaction with hearing instruments in the digital age. Hear J 58:30-43.
29. Kricos PB, Holmes AE. (1996) Efficacy of audiologic rehabilitation for older adults. J Am Acad Audiol 7(4):219-229.
30. Levitt H. (1971) Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am 49(2, Suppl. 2)467.
31. Martin M. (2007) Auditory training software program assessed. Hear J 60:32-35.
32. McArdle RA, Wilson RH. (2006) Homogeneity of the 18 QuickSIN lists. J Am Acad Audiol 17(3):157-167.
33. Miller JD, Watson CS, Kistler DJ, Wightman FL, Preminger JE. (2008) Preliminary evaluation of the speech perception assessment and training system (SPATS) with hearing-aid and cochlear- implant users. Proc Meet Acoust 2:1-9.
34. Montgomery AA, Walden BE, Schwartz DM, Prosek RA. (1984) Training auditory-visual speech reception in adults with moderate sensorineural hearing loss. Ear Hear 5(1):30-36.
35. Moore DR, Amitay S, Hawkey DJ. (2003) Auditory perceptual learning. Learn Mem 10(2):83-85.
36. Munro KJ, Lutman ME. (2004) Self-reported outcome in new hearing aid users over a 24-week post-fitting period. Int J Audiol 43 (10):555-562.
37. Noble W. (2002) Extending the IOI to significant others and to non-hearing-aid-based interventions. Int J Audiol 41(1):27-29.
38. Noble W, Gatehouse S. (2006) Effects of bilateral versus unilateral hearing aid fitting on abilities measured by the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol 45(3):172-181.
39. Noble W, Tyler R, Dunn C, Bhullar N. (2008) Unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants and the implant-plus-hearing-aid profile: comparing self-assessed and measured abilities. Int J Audiol 47 (8):505-514.
40. Oba SI, Fu QJ, Galvin JJ 3rd. (2011) Digit training in noise can improve cochlear implant users' speech understanding in noise. Ear Hear 32(5):573-581.
41. Pichora-Fuller MK, Schneider BA, Daneman M. (1995) How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 97(1):593-608.
42. Pichora-Fuller MK, Singh G. (2006) Effects of age on auditory and cognitive processing: implications for hearing aid fitting and audiologic rehabilitation. Trends Amplif 10(1):29-59.
43. Plomp R. (1986) A signal-to-noise ratiomodel for the speech-reception threshold of the hearing impaired. J Speech Hear Res 29(2):146-154.
44. Preminger J, Wiley TL. (1985) Frequency selectivity and consonant intelligibility in sensorineural hearing loss. J Speech Hear Res 28(2):197-206.
45. Reber MB, Kompis M. (2005) Acclimatization in first-time hearing aid users using three different fitting protocols. Auris Nasus Larynx 32(4):345-351.
46. Robinson K, Summerfield AQ. (1996) Adult auditory learning and training. Ear Hear 17(3, Suppl.):51S-65S.
47. Rubinstein A, Boothroyd A. (1987) Effect of two approaches to auditory training on speech recognition by hearing-impaired adults. J Speech Hear Res 30(2):153-160.
48. Schneider BA, Li L, Daneman M. (2007) How competing speech interferes with speech comprehension in everyday listening situations. J Am Acad Audiol 18(7):559-572.
49. Schow R, Nerbonne M. (2007) Introduction to Audiologic Rehabilitation. 5th ed. Boston: Pearson Education.
50. Shannon J, Preminger J. (2008) Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the home-based computerized auditory training in older experienced hearing aid users. Presented at the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology Annual Institute, Portland, OR
51. Song JH, SkoeE, BanaiK, KrausN. (2011) Training to improve hearing speech in noise: biological mechanisms. Cereb Cortex 22(5):1180-1190.
52. Speaks C, Jerger J. (1965) Method for measurement of speech identification. J Speech Hear Res 8:185-194.
53. Stecker GC, Bowman GA, Yund EW, Herron TJ, Roup CM, Woods DL. (2006) Perceptual training improves syllable identification in new and experienced hearing aid users. J Rehabil Res Dev 43(4):537-552.
54. Swan IR, Gatehouse S. (1995) The value of routine in-the-ear measurement of hearing aid gain. Br J Audiol 29(5):271-277.
55. Sweetow RW, Sabes JH. (2006) The need for and development of an adaptive Listening and Communication Enhancement (LACE) program. J Am Acad Audiol 17(8):538-558.
56. Sweetow R, Sabes J. (2007) Listening and communication enhancement (LACE). Semin Hear 28:133-141.
57. Sweetow RW, Sabes JH. (2010) Auditory training and challenges associated with participation and compliance. J Am Acad Audiol 21(9):586-593.
58. Takahashi G, Martinez CD, Beamer S, et al. (2007) Subjective measures of hearing aid benefit and satisfaction in the NIDCD/VA follow-up study. J Am Acad Audiol 18(4):323-349.
59. van Tasell DJ, Larsen SY, Fabry DA. (1988) Effects of an adaptive filter hearing aid on speech recognition in noise by hearingimpaired subjects. Ear Hear 9(1):15-21.
60. Walden BE, Erdman SA, Montgomery AA, Schwartz DM, Prosek RA. (1981) Some effects of training on speech recognition by hearing-impaired adults. J Speech Hear Res 24(2):207-216.
61. Wilson RH, McArdle RA, Smith SL. (2007) An evaluation of the BKB-SIN, HINT, QuickSIN, and WIN materials on listeners with normal hearing and listeners with hearing loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res 50(4):844-856.
62. Wright BA, Sabin AT. (2007) Perceptual learning: how much daily training is enough? Exp Brain Res 180(4):727-736.