Homogeneity of the 18 QuickSIN™ lists

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 157-167

  McArdle, Rachel A ^a   Wilson, Richard H ^a,b  

^a VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b East Tennesse State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory perception; Hearing loss; QuickSIN ; Speech perception; Word recognition in multitalker babble

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUDITORY SCREENING; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; AGE; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NOISE; PHYSIOLOGY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AUDIOMETRY, SPEECH; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS, HIGH-FREQUENCY; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; MALE; NOISE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 33747774505     PISSN: 10500545     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.17.3.2     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. American National Standards Institute. (1996) Specification for Audiometers (ANSI S3.6-1996). New York: American National Standards Institute.
2. Bochner JH, Garrison WM, Sussman JE, Burkhard RF. (2003) Development of materials for the clinical assessment of speech recognition: the speech sound pattern discrimination test. J Speech Lang Hear Res 46(4):889-900.
3. Carhart R, Tillman TW. (1970) Interaction of competing speech signals with hearing losses. Arch Otolaryngol 91:274-279.
4. Department of Veterans Affairs. (1998) Tonal and Speech Materials for Auditory Perceptual Assessment Disc 2.0. Mountain Home, TN: VA Medical Center.
5. Etymotic Research. (2001) QuickSIN. Compact Disc. Elk Grove Village, IL: Etymotic Research.
6. Finney DJ. (1952) Statistical Method in Biological Assay. London: C. Griffen.
7. Hawkins JE, Stevens SS. (1950) The masking of pure tones and of speech by white noise. J Acoust Soc Am 22:6-13.
8. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. (1969) IEEE Recommended Practice for Speech Quality Measurements. Boulder, CO: Global Engineering Documents.
9. Killion MC, Niquette PA, Gudmundsen GI, Revit LJ, Banerjee S. (2004) Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 116(4):2395-2405.
10. Killion MC, Villchur E. (1993) Kessler was right - partly: but SIN test shows some aids improve hearing in noise. Hear J 46(9):31-35.
11. Light LL. (1996) Memory and aging. In: Bork EL, Bjork RA, eds. Memory: Handbook of Perception and Cognition. 2nd ed. San Diego: Academic Press, 443-490.
12. McArdle RA, Wilson RH, Burks CA. (2005) Speech recognition in multitalker babble using digits, words, and sentences. J Am Acad Audiol 16:726-739.
13. Plomp R, Duquesnoy AJ. (1982) A model for the speech-reception threshold in noise without and with a hearing aid. Scand Audiol Suppl. 15:95-111.
14. Salthouse TA. (1990) Working memory as a processing resource in cognitive aging. Dev Rev 10:101-124. 2 Strom KE. (2003) The HR 2003 dispensing survey. Hear Rev 10(6):22-38.
15. Taylor B. (2003) Speech-in-noise tests: how and why to include them in your basic test battery. Hear J 56(1):40-46.
16. Thornton AR, Raffin MJM. (1978) Speech-discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable. J Speech Hear Res 21:507-518.
17. Tillman TW, Olsen WO. (1973) Speech audiometry. In: Jerger J, ed. Modern Developments in Audiology. 2nd ed. New York: Academic Press, 37-74.
18. Walden TC, Walden BE. (2004) Predicting success with hearing aids in everyday living. J Am Acad Audiol 15:342-352.
19. Wilson RH, Abrams HB, Pillion AL. (2003) A word-recognition task in multitalker babble using a descending presentation mode from 24-dB S/B to 0-dB S/B. J Rehabil Res Dev 40:321-328. http://www.vard.org/ jour/03/40/4/pdf/Wilson-B.pdf.
20. Wilson RH, Bell TS, Koslowski JA. (2003) Learning effects associated with repeated word-recognition measures using sentence materials. J Rehabil Res Develop 40:329-336. http://www.vard.org/jour/03/40/4/pdf/ Wilson-A.pdf.
21. Wilson RH, Margolis RH. (1983) Measurement of the auditory thresholds for speech stimuli. In: Konkle D, Rintelmann W, eds. Principles of Speech Audiometry. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press, 79-126.
22. Wilson RH, McArdle R. (2004) Speech in babble with varying linguistic context. Poster presented at the XXVIIth International Congress of Audiology, Phoenix, AZ.
23. Wilson RH, Morgan DE, Dirk DO. (1973) A proposed SRT procedure and its statistical precedent. J Speech Hear Disord 38:184-191.