Digit training in noise can improve cochlear implant users' speech understanding in noise

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 573-581

  Oba, Sandra I ^a   Fu, Qian Jie ^a,b   Galvin, John J ^a  

^a HOUSE EAR INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED THERAPY; CONDITIONING; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NOISE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

AGED; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; CONDITIONING (PSYCHOLOGY); DEAFNESS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NOISE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION TESTS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH RECEPTION THRESHOLD TEST; THERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 80052491830     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31820fc821     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Amitay, S., Irwin, A., Moore, D. R. (2006). Discrimination learning induced by training with identical stimuli. Nat Neurosci, 9, 1446-1448. (Pubitemid 44646218)
2. Chatelin, V., Kim, E. J., Driscoll, C., et al. (2004). Cochlear implant outcomes in the elderly. Otol Neurotol, 25, 298-301. (Pubitemid 39079812)
3. Davis, M. H., Hervais-Adelman, A., Taylor, K. et al. (2005). Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: Evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences. J Exp Psych, 134, 222-241. (Pubitemid 40687793)
4. Friedland, D. R., Runge-Samuelson, C., Baig, H., et al. (2010). Casecontrol analysis of cochlear implant performance in elderly patients. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 136, 432-438.
5. Frisina, D. R., & Frisina, R. D. (1997). Speech recognition in noise and presbycusis: Relations to possible neural mechanisms. Hear Res, 106, 95-104. (Pubitemid 27186318)
6. Fu, Q. J., & Galvin, J. J., III. (2008). Maximizing cochlear implant patients' performance with advanced speech training procedures. Hear Res, 242, 198-208.
7. Fu, Q. J., & Nogaki, G. (2005). Noise susceptibility of cochlear implant users: The role of spectral resolution and smearing. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 6, 19-27. (Pubitemid 40616501)
8. Fu. Q. J., Galvin, J. J., III, Wang, X., et al. (2004). Effects of auditory training on adult cochlear implant patients: A preliminary report. Cochlear Implants Int, 5, 84-90. (Pubitemid 39591694)
9. Fu, Q. J., Galvin, J. J., III, Wang, X., et al. (2005). Moderate auditory training can improve speech performance of adult cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am, 6(ARLO), 106-111. (Pubitemid 41374592)
10. Fu, Q. J., Shannon, R. V., Wang, X. (1998). Effects of noise and number of channels on vowel and consonant recognition: Acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am, 104, 3586-3596. (Pubitemid 29006021)
11. Galvin, J. J., III, Fu, Q. J., Nogaki, G. (2007). Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners. Ear Hear, 28, 302-319. (Pubitemid 46718011)
12. Gifford, R. H., & Revit, L. J. (2010). Speech perception for adult cochlear implant recipients in a realistic background noise: Effectiveness of preprocessing strategies and external options for improving speech recognition in noise. J Am Acad Audiol, 21, 441-451.
13. Gordon-Salant, S., & Fitzgibbons, P. J. (1995). Recognition of multiply degraded speech by young and elderly listeners. J Speech Hear Res, 38, 1150-1156.
14. IEEE Subcommittee. (1969). IEEE recommended practice for speech quality measurements. IEEE Trans Audio Electroacoust, AU-17, 225-246.
15. Levitt, H. (1971). Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am, 49, 467-476.
16. Li, T. H., & Fu, Q. J. (2007). Perceptual adaptation to spectrally shifted vowels: The effects of lexical and non-lexical labeling. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 8, 32-41.
17. Loeb, G. E., & Kessler, D. K. (1995). Speech recognition performance over time with the Clarion cochlear prosthesis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl, 166, 290-292.
18. Loebach, J. L., & Pisoni, D. B. (2008). Perceptual learning of spectrally degraded speech and environmental sounds. J Acoust Soc Am, 123, 1126-1139. (Pubitemid 351208320)
19. Moore, D., Amitay, S., Halliday, L. (2010). Changes in accuracy with interval order during auditory development and learning. Abstracts of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 33rd Midwinter Meeting, 304.
20. Müller-Deile, J., Kiefer, J., Wyss, J., et al. (2008). Performance benefits for adults using a cochlear implant with adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO): A comparative study. Cochlear Implants Int, 9, 8-26.
21. Nelson, P. B., Jin, S. H., Carney, A. E., et al. (2003). Understanding speech in modulated interference: Cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 113, 961-968. (Pubitemid 36240723)
22. Nilsson, M., Soli, S. D., Sullivan, J. A. (1994). Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 95, 1085-1099. (Pubitemid 24056373)
23. Nogaki, G., Fu, Q. J., Galvin, J. J., III. (2007). The effect of training rate on recognition of spectrally shifted speech. Ear Hear, 28, 132-140. (Pubitemid 46673492)
24. Plomp, R., & Mimpen, A. M. (1979). Speech-reception threshold for sentences as a function of age and noise level. J Acoust Soc Am, 66, 1333-1342.
25. Schvartz, K. C., Chatterjee, M., Gordon-Salant, S. (2008). Recognition of spectrally degraded phonemes by younger, middle-aged, and older normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 124, 3972-3988.
26. Skinner, M. W., Clark, G. M., Whitford, L. A., et al. (1994). Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the Nucleus-22 channel cochlear implant system. Am J Otol, 15, 15-27. (Pubitemid 24345014)
27. Spivak, L. G., & Waltzman, S. B. (1990). Performance of cochlear implant patients as a function of time. J Speech Hear Res, 33, 511-519. (Pubitemid 20306193)
28. Stacey, P. C., Raine, C. H., O'Donoghue, G. M., et al. (2010). Effectiveness of computer-based auditory training for adult users of cochlear implants. Int J Audiol, 49, 347-356.
29. Stacey, P. C., & Summerfield, A. Q. (2007). Effectiveness of computerbased auditory training in improving the perception of noise-vocoded speech. J Acoust Soc Am, 121, 2923-2935. (Pubitemid 46701287)
30. Stacey, P. C., & Summerfield, A. Q. (2008). Comparison of word-, sentence-, and phoneme-based training strategies in improving the perception of spectrally distorted speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 51, 526-538. (Pubitemid 351838313)
31. Studebaker, G. A. (1985). A "rationalized" arcsine transform. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 28, 455-462.
32. Tyler, R. S., Parkinson, A. J., Woodworth, G. G., et al. (1997). Performance over time of adult patients using the Ineraid or Nucleus cochlear implant. J Acoust Soc Am, 102, 508-522. (Pubitemid 27300531)
33. Vermeire, K., Brokx, J. P. L., Wuyts, F. L., et al. (2005). Quality-of-life benefit from cochlear implantation in the elderly. Otol Neurotol, 26, 188-195. (Pubitemid 40418651)
34. Wolfe, J., Schafer, E. C., Heldner, B., et al. (2009). Evaluation of speech recognition in noise with cochlear implants and dynamic FM. J Am Acad Audiol, 20, 409-421.