Objective accommodation measurement of the crystalens HD compared to monofocal intraocular lenses

Journal of Refractive Surgery

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 133-139

  Zamora Alejo, Katherine V ^a   Moore, Sacha Pierre ^a   Parker, Douglas G A ^a   Ullrich, Katja ^a   Esterman, Adrian ^b   Goggin, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CATARACT; CATARACT EXTRACTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; KERATOMETER; LENS IMPLANT; LUMINANCE; MALE; MEASUREMENT; MYOPIA; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 84875598005     PISSN: 1081597X     EISSN: 19382391     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20130117-09     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Pepose JS, Qazi MA, Davies J, et al. Visual performance of patients with bilateral vs. combination Crystalens, ReZoom, and ReSTOR intraocular lens implants. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144(3):347-357.
2. Glasser A. Restoration of accommodation: surgical options for correction of presbyopia. Clin Exp Optom. 2008;91(3):279-295.
3. Comander J, Pineda R 2nd. Accommodating intraocular lenses: theory and practice. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2010;50(1):107-117.
4. Marchini G, Pedrotti E, Sartori P, Tosi R. Ultrasound biomicroscopic changes during accommodation in eyes with accommodating intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30(12):2476-2482.
5. Koeppl C, Findl O, Menapace R, et al. Pilocarpine-induced shift of an accommodating intraocular lens: AT-45 Crystalens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(7):1290-1297.
6. Alió JL, Piñero DP, Plaza-Puche AB. Visual outcomes and optical performance with a monofocoal intraocular lens and a new-generation single-optic accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36(10):1656-1664.
7. Wold J, Hu A, Chen S, Glasser A. Subjective and objective measurement of human accommodative amplitude. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29(11):1878-1888.
8. Win-Hall DM, Ostrin LA, Kasthurirangan S, Glasser A. Objective accommodation measurement with the Grand Seiko and Hartinger coincidence refractometer. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84(4):879-887.
9. Sheppard AL, Davies LN. Clinical evaluation of the Grand Seiko Auto Ref/Keratometer WAM-5500. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 2010;30(2):143-151.
10. Wolffsohn JS, Davies LN, Naroo SA, et al. Evaluation of an open-fi eld autorefractor's ability to measure refraction and hence potential to assess objective accommodation in pseudophakes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011;95(4):498-501.
11. Haegerstrom-Portnoy G, Brabyn J, Schneck ME, Jampolsky A. The SKILL Card: an acuity test of reduced luminance and contrast. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38(1):207-218.
12. Alpins NA. A new method of analyzing vectors for changes in astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993;19(4):524-533.
13. Macsai MS, Padnick-Silver L, Fontes BM. Visual outcomes after accommodating intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32(4):628-633.
14. Cumming JS, Dolvard M, Dell SJ, et al. Clinical evaluation of the Crystalens AT-45 accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32(5):812-825.
15. Win-Hall DM, Glasser A. Objective accommodation measurements in pseudophakic subjects using an autorefractor and aberrometer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(2):282-290.
16. Dick HB. Accommodative intraocular lenses: current status. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2005;16(1):8-26.
17. Glasser A. Accommodation: mechanism and measurement. Ophthalmol Clin N Am. 2006;19(1):1-12.