Visual outcomes after accommodating intraocular lens implantation

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 628-633

  Macsai, Marian S ^a   Padnick Silver, Lissa ^a   Fontes, Bruno M ^a  

^a Evanston Northwestern Healthcare   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; CATARACT; CATARACT EXTRACTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE SURGERY; HUMAN; LENS IMPLANT; LENS IMPLANTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINOSCOPY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STUDENT T TEST; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; VISION; VISUAL ACUITY;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; AGED; CAPSULORHEXIS; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; HUMANS; LENS IMPLANTATION, INTRAOCULAR; LENSES, INTRAOCULAR; MIDDLE AGED; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; RETINOSCOPY; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 33646493474     PISSN: 08863350     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.01.027     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bellucci R. Multifocal intraocular lenses. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 16 (2005) 33-37
2. Mamalis N., Davis B., Nilson C.D., et al. Complications of foldable intraocular lenses requiring explantation or secondary intervention-2003 survey update. J Cataract Refract Surg 30 (2004) 2209-2218
3. Nijkamp M.D., Dolders M.G.T., de Brabander J., et al. Effectiveness of multifocal intraocular lenses to correct presbyopia after cataract surgery; a randomized controlled trial. Ophthalmology 111 (2004) 1832-1839
4. Avitabile T., and Marano F. Multifocal intra-ocular lenses. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 12 (2001) 12-16
5. Moreira Salera C., Marciano Souza S.E., Guimarães M.R., et al. Resultados do implante bilaterial de lente intra-ocular multifocal SA-40N no Hospital de Olhos de Minas Gerais. Arq Bras Oftalmol 68 (2005) 117-121
6. Pineda-Fernández A., Jaramillo J., Celis V., et al. Refractive outcomes after bilateral multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 30 (2004) 685-688
7. Montés-Micó R., España E., Bueno I., et al. Visual performance with multifocal intraocular lenses; mesopic contrast sensitivity under distance and near conditions. Ophthalmology 111 (2004) 85-96
8. Leyland M., and Zinicola E. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery; a systematic review. Ophthalmology 110 (2003) 1789-1798
9. Richter-Mueksch S., Weghaupt H., Skorpik C., et al. Reading performance with a refractive multifocal and a diffractive bifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 28 (2002) 1957-1963
10. Leyland M.D., Langan L., Goolfee F., et al. Prospective randomised double-masked trial of bilateral multifocal, bifocal or monofocal intraocular lenses. Eye 16 (2002) 481-490
11. Walkow T., and Klemen U.M. Patient satisfaction after implantation of diffractive designed multifocal intraocular lenses in dependence on objective parameters. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 239 (2001) 683-687
12. Leyland M., and Zinicola E. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3 (2001) CD003169
13. Javitt J.C., and Steinert R.F. Cataract extraction with multifocal intraocular lens implantation; a multinational clinical trial evaluating clinical, functional, and quality-of-life outcomes. Ophthalmology 107 (2000) 2040-2048
14. Steinert R.F., Aker B.L., Trentacost D.J., et al. A prospective comparative study of the AMO ARRAY zonal-progressive multifocal silicone intraocular lens and a monofocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology 106 (1999) 1243-1255
15. Keates R.H., Pearce J.L., and Schneider R.T. Clinical results of the multifocal lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 13 (1987) 557-560
16. Pieh S., Lackner B., Hanselmayer G., et al. Halo size under distance and near conditions in refractive multifocal intraocular lenses. Br J Ophthalmol 85 (2001) 816-821
17. Montés-Micó R., and Alió J.L. Distance and near contrast sensitivity function after multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 29 (2003) 703-711
18. Dick H.B. Accommodative intraocular lenses: current status. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 16 (2005) 8-26
19. Cumming J.S., Slade S.G., and Chayet A. Clinical evaluation of the model AT-45 silicone accommodating intraocular lens; results of feasibility and the initial phase of a Food and Drug Administration clinical trial; the AT-45 Study Group. Ophthalmology 108 (2001) 2005-2009 discussion by TP Werblin, 2010
20. Dolders M.G.T., Nijkamp M.D., Nuijts R.M.M.A., et al. Cost effectiveness of foldable multifocal intraocular lenses compared to foldable monofocal intraocular lenses for cataract surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 88 (2004) 1163-1168
21. Sen H.N., Sarikkola A.-U., Uusitalo R.J., and Laatikainen L. Quality of vision after AMO Array multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 30 (2004) 2483-2493
22. Hayashi K., Hayashi H., Nakao F., and Hayashi F. Correlation between pupillary size and intraocular lens decentration and visual acuity of a zonal-progressive multifocal lens and a monofocal lens. Ophthalmology 108 (2001) 2011-2017
23. Alió J.L., Tavolato M., De la Hoz F., et al. Near vision restoration with refractive lens exchange and pseudoaccommodating and multifocal refractive and diffractive intraocular lenses; comparative clinical study. J Cataract Refract Surg 30 (2004) 2494-2503
24. Hoffman R.S., Fine I.H., and Packer M. Refractive lens exchange as a refractive surgery modality. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 15 (2004) 22-28
25. Stachs O., Schneider H., Stave J., and Guthoff R. Potentially accommodating intraocular lenses-an in vitro and in vivo study using three-dimensional high-frequency ultrasound. J Refract Surg 21 (2005) 37-45
26. Marchini G., Pedrotti E., Sartori P., and Tosi R. Ultrasound biomicroscopic changes during accommodation in eyes with accommodating intraocular lenses; pilot study and hypothesis for the mechanism of accommodation. J Cataract Refract Surg 30 (2004) 2476-2482
27. Oshika T., Mimura T., Tanaka S., et al. Apparent accommodation and corneal wavefront aberration in pseudophakic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43 (2002) 2882-2886
28. Langenbucher A., Seitz B., Huber S., et al. Theoretical and measured pseudophakic accommodation after implantation of a new accommodative posterior chamber intraocular lens. Arch Ophthalmol 121 (2003) 1722-1727
29. Langenbucher A., Huber S., Nguyen N.X., et al. Measurement of accommodation after implantation of an accommodating posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 29 (2003) 677-685
30. Ostrin L.A., and Glasser A. Accommodation measurements in a prepresbyopic and presbyopic population. J Cataract Refract Surg 30 (2004) 1435-1444
31. Koeppl C., Findl O., Menapace R., et al. Pilocarpine-induced shift of an accommodating intraocular lens: AT-45 Crystalens. J Cataract Refract Surg 31 (2005) 1290-1297