An empiric analysis of Omaha system targets

Applied Clinical Informatics

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 317-330

  Monsen, K ^a   Melton Meaux, G ^b,d   Timm, J ^c   Westra, B ^a,d   Kerr, M ^a   Raman, N ^d   Farri, O ^d   Hart, C ^a   Martin, K ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c Department of Public Health and Environment   (United States)

^d University Of Minnesota Institute for Health Informatics   (United States)

^e NONE

Author keywords

Clinical care; Clinical data management standards; Data analysis; Evaluation; Methologies; Omaha system; System improvement

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875567264     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18690327     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2010-12-RA-0076     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Markle Connecting for Health Collaborative. Achieving the health IT objectives of ARRA: A framework for "Meaningful Use" and "Certified or Qualified" EHR [Internet]. 2009. [Cited 2010 Dec 30] Available from: http://markle.org/downloadable_assets/20090430_meaningful_use.pdf
2. Martin KS, Monsen KA, Bowles KH. The Omaha System and meaningful use: Applications for practice, education, and research. Comput Inform Nurs 2011; 29: 52-58.
3. Blumenthal D. Launching HITECH. N Engl J Med 2010; 362(5): 382-385.
4. Westra BL, Delaney CW, Konicek D, Keenan G. Nursing standards to support the electronic health record. Nurs Outlook 2008; 56(5): 258-266.
5. Rosenbloom ST, Miller RA, Johnson KB, Elkin PL, Brown SH. A model for evaluating interface terminologies. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008; 15(1): 65-76.
6. American Nurses Association. ANA recognized terminologies and data element sets. [Cited 2010 Dec 30] Available from: http://www.nursingworld.org/npii/terminologies.htm.
7. McCloskey JC, Bulechek GM. Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC). 4th Ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2007.
8. International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP) 2011. Available from: http://www.icn.ch/pillar sprograms/international-classification-for-nursing-practicer/
9. Saba V. Clinical Care Classification (CCC) System Manual: A Guide to Nursing Documentation. New York:Springer; 2006.
10. Martin, KS. The Omaha System: A key to practice, documentation, and information management. Reprinted 2nd ed. Omaha, NE: Health Connections Press; 2005.
11. Farri O, Monsen KA, Westra BL, Melton, G. Analysis of free text with Omaha System Targets in Community-Based Care to Inform Practice and Terminology Development. Applied Clinical Informatics 2011; 2: 304-316.
12. Rosenbloom ST, Miller RA, Johnson KB, Elkin PL, Brown SH. Interface terminologies: Facilitating direct entry of clinical data into electronic health record systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006; 13(3): 277-288.
13. Monsen KA, Westra BL, Yu F, Ramadoss VK, Kerr MJ. Intervention data management for effectiveness research: Comparing inductive and deductive approaches. Res Nurs Health 2009; 32(6): 647-656.
14. Monsen KA, Banerjee A, Das P. Discovering client and intervention patterns in home visiting data. West J Nurs Res 2010; 83: 1031-1054.
15. Monsen KA, Westra BL, Oancea SC, Yu F, Kerr MJ. Comparing approaches for linking home care interventions and hospitalization outcomes for frail and non-frail elderly clients. Res Nurs Health 2011; 34: 160-168.
16. Martin KS, Scheet NJ. The Omaha System: Applications for community health nursing. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1992.
17. Melton GB, Westra BL, Raman N, Monsen KA, Kerr MJ, Hart CH, Solomon DA, Timm JE. Informing standard development and understanding user needs with Omaha System signs and symptoms text entries in community-based care settings. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2010: 512-516.
18. Powerwrite. Understanding parts of speech and sentences. [Cited 2010 Dec 30] Available from: http://fac web.furman.edu/~moakes/Powerwrite/partspeech.htm