Visualization of the transmission of direct genomic values for paternal and maternal chromosomes for 15 traits in US Brown Swiss, Holstein, and Jersey cattle

Journal of Dairy Science

Volumn 96, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 2713-2726

  Cole, J B ^a   Null, D J ^a  

^a AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Direct genomic value; Genomic selection; Haplotype; Visualization

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BREEDING; CATTLE; CHROMOSOME; DAIRYING; FEMALE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; HAPLOTYPE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALS; BREEDING; CATTLE; CHROMOSOMES, MAMMALIAN; DAIRYING; FEMALE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; HAPLOTYPES; MALE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; SELECTION, GENETIC; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALIA; BOS; BOS TAURUS;

EID: 84875532162     PISSN: 00220302     EISSN: 15253198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2012-6008     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bastiaansen J.W.M., Coster A., Calus M.P.L., van Arendonk J.A.M., Bovenhuis H. Long-term response to genomic selection: Effects of estimation method and reference population structure for different genetic architectures. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2012, 44:3.
2. Börner V., Reinsch N. Optimising multistage dairy cattle breeding schemes including genomic selection using decorrelated or optimum selection indices. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2012, 44.
3. Canonical Ltd. 2012. Kubuntu 12.04 LTS (Precise Pangolin). Accessed Jun. 14, 2012. http://www.kubuntu.org/.
4. Cohen-Zinder M., Seroussi E., Larkin D.M., Loor J.J., Evertsvan der Wind A., Lee J.H., Drackley J.K., Band M.R., Hernandez A.G., Shani M., Lewin H.A., Weller J.I., Ron M. Identification of a missense mutation in the bovine ABCG2 gene with a major effect on the QTL on chromosome 6 affecting milk yield and composition in Holstein cattle. Genome Res. 2005, 15:936-944.
5. Cole J.B. Applications of haplotypes in dairy farm management. 62nd Europ. Assoc. Anim. Prod. Mtg., Bratislava, Slovak Republic 2012, 18:189. Abstr. 10.3920/978-90-8686-761-5.
6. Cole, J. B., and D. J. Null. 2012. AIPL Research Report GENOMICS2: Use of chromosomal predicted transmitting abilities. Accessed Jun. 13, 2012. http://aipl.arsusda.gov/reference/chromosomal_pta_query.html.
7. Cole J.B., VanRaden P.M. Visualization of results from genomic evaluations. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93:2727-2740.
8. Cole J.B., VanRaden P.M. Use of haplotypes to estimate Mendelian sampling effects and selection limits. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2011, 128:446-455.
9. Cole J.B., VanRaden P.M., O'Connell J.R., Van Tassell C.P., Sonstegard T.S., Schnabel R.D., Taylor J.F., Wiggans G.R. Distribution and location of genetic effects for dairy traits. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92:2931-2946.
10. Cole, J. B., P. M. VanRaden, and Multi-State Project S-1040. 2009a. AIPL Research Report NM$4: Net merit as a measure of lifetime profit: 2010 revision. Accessed Jun. 13, 2012. http://aipl.arsusda.gov/reference/nmcalc.htm.
11. De Vries A., Galligan D.T., Cole J.B. Some ideas on the use and economic value of the 3K SNP genomic test for calves on dairy farms. Dairy Update 2011, 11:5-9.
12. Engelsma K.A., Veerkamp R.F., Calus M.P.L., Windig J.J. Consequences for diversity when prioritizing animals for conservation with pedigree or genomic information. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2011, 128:473-481.
13. Falconer D.S., MacKay T.F.C. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics 1996, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY. 4th ed.
14. Grisart B., Farnir F., Karim L., Cambisano N., Kim J.J., Kvasz A., Mni M., Simon P., Frere J.M., Coppieters W., Georges M. Genetic and functional confirmation of the causality of the DGAT1 K232A quantitative trait nucleotide in affecting milk yield and composition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2004, 101:2398-2403.
15. Hansen L.B. Consequences of selection for milk yield from a geneticist's viewpoint. J. Dairy Sci. 2000, 83:1145-1150.
16. Hayes B.J., Pryce J., Chamberlain A.J., Bowman P.J., Goddard M.E. Genetic architecture of complex traits and accuracy of genomic prediction: Coat colour, milk-fat percentage, and type in Holstein cattle as contrasting model traits. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6:e1001139. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001139.
17. Kemper K.E., Bowman P.J., Pryce J.E., Hayes B.J., Goddard M.E. Long-term selection strategies for complex traits using high-density genetic markers. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95:4646-4656.
18. Lawlor T.J. What's your genomic testing plan?. Holstein Pulse. 2011, Winter 2011:8-9.
19. Lush J.L Animal Breeding Plans 1945, Iowa State College Press, Ames, IA.
20. Nishio M., Kahi A.K., Hirooka H. Optimization of mate selection based on genotypic information with overlapping generations. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2010, 127:34-41.
21. Pryce J.E., Hayes B.J., Goddard M.E. Novel strategies to minimize progeny inbreeding while maximizing genetic gain using genomic information. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95:377-388.
22. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2010, R Development Core Team, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
23. Snustad D.P., Simmons M.J. Principles of Genetics 2008, John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken, NJ. 5th ed.
24. The Document Foundation. 2012. LibreOffice. Accessed Jun. 14, 2012. http://www.libreoffice.org/.
25. Toro M.A., Varona L. A note on mate allocation for dominance handling in genomic selection. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2010, 42:33.
26. Van Tassell C.P., Van Vleck L.D. Estimates of genetic selection differentials and generation intervals for four paths of selection. J. Dairy Sci. 1991, 74:1078-1086.
27. VanRaden P.M. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J. Dairy Sci. 2008, 91:4414-4423.
28. VanRaden P.M., O'Connell J.R., Wiggans G.R., Weigel K.A. Genomic evaluations with many more genotypes. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2011, 43:10.
29. VanRaden P.M., Olson K.M., Wiggans G.R., Cole J.B., Tooker M.E. Genomic inbreeding and relationships among Holsteins, Jerseys, and Brown Swiss. J. Dairy Sci. 2011, 94:5673-5682.
30. VanRaden P.M., Van Tassell C.P., Wiggans G.R., Sonstegard T.S., Schnabel R.D., Taylor J.R., Schenkel F.S. Invited review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92:16-24.
31. Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis 2009, Springer, New York, NY.
32. Wiggans G.R., Cooper T.A., VanRaden P.M., Cole J.B. Technical note: Adjustment of traditional cow evaluations to improve accuracy of genomic predictions. J. Dairy Sci. 2011, 94:6188-6193.
33. Young C.W. Review of regional project NC-2. J. Dairy Sci. 1977, 60:493-498.