Response of osteoblast-like cells to zirconia with different surface topography

Dental Materials Journal

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 122-129

  Ito, Hiroshi ^a   Sasaki, Hodaka ^a   Saito, Kensuke ^a   Honma, Shinya ^a   Yajima, Yasutomo ^a   Yoshinari, Masao ^a  

^a TOKYO DENTAL COLLEGE   (Japan)

Author keywords

3 dimensional surface characterization; Osteoblast like cell; Surface topography; Zirconia

Indexed keywords

CELL ATTACHMENTS; INTERFACIAL AREAS; MC3T3-E1; MC3T3-E1 CELL; OSTEOBLAST-LIKE CELLS; PROLIFERATION RATE; SURFACE CHARACTERIZATION; YTTRIA STABILIZED TETRAGONAL ZIRCONIA POLYCRYSTALS;

ALUMINA; CELLS; CYTOLOGY; HYDROFLUORIC ACID; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY; YTTRIA STABILIZED ZIRCONIA;

ZIRCONIA;

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; ALUMINUM OXIDE; COLLAGEN TYPE 1; HYDROFLUORIC ACID; OSTEOCALCIN; YTTRIA STABILIZED TETRAGONAL ZIRCONIA; YTTRIUM; ZIRCONIUM;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL STRAIN 3T3; CHEMISTRY; CULTURE TECHNIQUE; CYTOLOGY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETICS; MATERIALS TESTING; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MOUSE; OSTEOBLAST; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; 3T3 CELL LINE; PROCEDURES;

3T3 CELLS; ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; ALUMINUM OXIDE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; COLLAGEN TYPE I; GENE EXPRESSION; HYDROFLUORIC ACID; MATERIALS TESTING; MICE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; OSTEOBLASTS; OSTEOCALCIN; SURFACE PROPERTIES; YTTRIUM; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 84875525246     PISSN: 02874547     EISSN: 18811361     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2012-208     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Lalor PA, Revell PA, Gray AB, Wright S, Railton GT, Freeman MA. Sensitivity to titanium. A cause of implant failure? J Bone Joint Surg 1991; British Volume 73: 25-28.
2. Thewes M, Kretschmer R, Gfesser M, Rakoski J, Nerlich M, Borelli S, Ring J. Immunohistochemical characterization of the perivascular infiltrate cells in tissues adjacent to stainless steel implants compared with titanium implants. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2001; 121: 223-226.
3. Thomas P, Bandl WD, Maier S, Summer B, Przybilla B. Hypersensitivity to titanium osteosynthesis with impaired fracture healing, eczema, and T-cell hyperresponsiveness in vitro: case report and review of the literature. Contact Dermatitis 2006; 55: 199-202.
4. Akagawa Y, Ichikawa Y, Nikai H, Tsuru H. Interface histology of unloaded and early loaded partially stabilized zirconia endosseous implant in initial bone healing. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 69: 599-604.
5. Akagawa Y, Hosokawa R, Sato Y, Kamayama K. Comparison between freestanding and tooth-connected partially stabilized zirconia implants after two years' function in monkeys: a clinical and histological study. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 551-558.
6. Aita H, Att W, Ueno T, Yamada M, Hori N, Iwasa F, Tsukimura N, Ogawa T. Ultraviolet light-mediated photofunctionalization of titanium to promote human mesenchymal stem cell migration, attachment, proliferation, and differentiation. Acta Biomater 2009; 5: 3247-3257.
7. Balloni S, Calvi EM, Damiani F, Bistoni G, Calvitti M, Locci P, Becchetti E, Marinucci L. Effects of titanium surface roughness on mesenchymal stem cell commitment and differentiation signaling. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 24: 627-635.
8. Mendonça G, Mendonça DBS, Simoes LG, Araujo AL, Leite ER, Duarte WR, Aragao FJ, Cooper LF. The effects of implant surface nanoscale features on osteoblast-specific gene expression. Biomaterials 2009; 30: 4053-4062.
9. Kohal RJ, Baechle M, Han JS, Hueren D, Huebner U, Butz F. In vitro reaction of human osteoblasts on alumina-toughened zirconia. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 1265-1271.
10. Bächle M, Butz F, Hübner U, Bakalinis E, Kohal RJ. Behaviour of CAL72 osteoblastlike cells on zirconia ceramics with different surface topographies. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18: 53-59.
11. Depprich R, Ommerborn M, Zipprich H, Naujoks C, Handschel J, Wiesmann HP, Kubler NR, Meyer U. Behavior of osteoblastic cells cultured on titanium and structured zirconia surfaces. Head Face Med 2008; 4: 29.
12. Yamashita D, Machigashira M, Miyamoto M, Takeuchi H, Noguchi K, Izumi Y, Ban S. Effects of surface roughness on initial responses of osteoblast-like cells on two types of zirconia. Dent Mater J 2009; 28: 461-470.
13. Badley RA, Woods A, Carruthers L, Rees DA. Cytoskeleton changes in fibroblast adhesion and detachment. J Cell Sci 1980; 43: 379-390.
14. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Suggested guidelines for the topographic evaluation of implant surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15: 331-344.
15. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20 (Suppl. 4): 172-184
16. Mendonça G, Mendonça DBS, Aragão FJL, Cooper LF. Advancing dental implant surface technology-from micronto nanotopography. Biomaterials 2008; 29: 3822-3835.
17. Zhao L, Mei S, Chu PK, Zhang Y, Wu Z. The influence of hierarchical hybrid micro/nano-textured titanium surface with titania nanotubes on osteoblast functions. Biomaterials 2010; 31: 5072-5082.
18. Lim JY, Hansen JC, Siedlecki CA, Runt J, Donahue HJ. Human foetal osteoblastic cell response to polymer-demixed nanotopographic interfaces. J R Soc Interface. 2005; 2: 97-108.
19. Lim JY, Dreiss AD, Zhou Z, Hansen JC, Siedlecki CA, Hengstebeck RW, Cheng J, Winograd N, Donahue HJ. The regulation of integrin mediated osteoblast focal adhesion and focal adhesion kinase expression by nanoscale topography. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 1787-1797.
20. Palin E, Liu H, Webster TJ. Mimicking the nanofeatures of bone increases bone-forming cell adhesion and proliferation. Nanotechnology 2005; 16: 1828-1835.
21. Hansen JC, Lim JY, Xu LC, Siedlecki CA, Mauger DT Donahue HJ. Effect of surface nanoscale topography on elastic modulus of individual osteoblastic cells as determined by atomic force microscopy. J Biomech 2007; 40: 2865-2871.
22. Ward BC, Webster TJ. The effect of nanotopography on calcium and phosphorus deposition on metallic materials in vitro. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 3064-3074.
23. Zhu B, Lu Q, Yin J, Hu J, Wang Z. Alignment of osteoblastlike cells and cell-produced collagen matrix induced by nanogrooves. Tissue Eng 2005; 11: 825-834.
24. 2 nanotubes on Ti: influence of nanoscale morphology on bone cell-materials interaction. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009; 90: 225-237.
25. 2 nanonodular structures in a micro-to-nanoscale hierarchy model. Biomaterials 2009; 30: 5319-5329.
26. Pae A, Kim SS, Kim HS, Woo YH. Osteoblast-like cell attachment and proliferation on turned, blasted, and anodized titanium surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011; 26: 475-481.
27. Lohmann CH, Bonewald LF, Sisk MA, Sylvia VL, Cochran DL, Dean DD, Boyan BD, Schwartz Z. Maturation state determines the response of osteogenic cells to surface roughness and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. J Bone Miner Res 2000; 15: 1169-1180.
28. Boyan BD, Lossdörfer S, Wang L, Zhao G, Lohmann CH, Cochran DL, Schwartz Z. Osteoblasts generate an osteogenic microenvironment when grown on surfaces with rough microtopographies. Eur Cell Mater 2003; 6: 22-27.
29. Zhao G, Raines AL, Wieland M, Schwartz Z, Boyan BD. Requirement for both micron-and submicron-scale structure for synergistic responses of osteoblasts to substrate surface energy and topography. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 2821-2829.
30. 2 blasted titanium implant material for attachment, proliferation and differentiation of cells derived from human mandibular alveolar bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12: 515-525.
31. Weiss RE, Reddi AH. Appearance of fibronectin during the differentiation of cartilage, bone, and bone marrow. J Cell Biol 1981; 88: 630-636.
32. Pearson BS, Klebe RJ, Boyan BD, Moskowicz D. Comments on the clinical application of fibronectin in dentistry. J Dent Res 1988; 67: 515-517.
33. Martin JY, Schwartz Z, Hummert TW, Schraub DM, Simpson J, Lankford J Jr, Dean DD, Cochran DL, Boyan BD. Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differentiation, and protein synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells (MG63). J Biomed Mater Res 1995; 29: 55-63.
34. van Kooten TG, Spijker HT, Busscher HJ. Plasma-treated polystyrene surfaces: model surfaces for studying cellbiomaterial interactions. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 1735-1747.
35. Att W, Takeuchi M, Suzuki T, Kubo K, Anpo M, Ogawa T. Enhanced osteoblast function on ultraviolet light-treated zirconia. Biomaterials 2009; 30: 1273-1280.
36. Wei J, Igarashi T, Okumori N, Igarashi T, Maetani T, Liu B. Yoshinari M. Influence of surface wettability on competitive protein adsorption and initial attachment of osteoblasts. Biomed Mater 2009; 4: 045002.
37. de Oliveira RT, Nanci A. Nanotexturing of titanium-based surfaces upregulates expression of bone sialoprotein and osteopontin by cultured osteogenic cells. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 403-413.
38. 2 grit blasted titanium implants on adherent osteoblast gene expression in vitro and in vivo. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 5418-5425.
39. Ellingsen JE. On the properties of surface-modified titanium. In: Davies JE, editor. Bone Engineering. 1st ed. Toronto; 2000; p.183-188.