Generating extractive summaries of scientific paradigms

Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research

Volumn 46, Issue , 2013, Pages 165-201

  Qazvinian, Vahed ^a   Radev, Dragomir R ^a   Mohammad, Saif M ^b   Dorr, Bonnie ^c   Zajic, David ^c   Whidby, Michael ^c   Moon, Taesun ^c  

^a The Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering   (United States)

^b NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL CANADA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DYNAMIC POSITIONING; SYNTACTICS;

AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED; COMMUNITY DETECTION; DEPENDENCY PARSING; LARGE AMOUNTS; SCIENTIFIC ARTICLES; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; SCIENTIFIC PARADIGM; SET OF QUESTIONS;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84875521291     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10769757     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1613/jair.3732     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Abu-Jbara, A., & Radev, D. (2011). Coherent citation-based summarization of scientific papers. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-11), pp. 500-509.
2. Athar, A. (2011). Sentiment analysis of citations using sentence structure-based features. In Proceedings of the ACL 2011 Student Session, HLT-SS '11, pp. 81-87.
3. Athar, A., & Teufel, S. (2012). Context-enhanced citation sentiment detection. In Proceedings of the 2012 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp. 597-601, Montréal, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics.
4. Awasthi, P., Gagrani, A., & Ravindran, B. (2007). Image modeling using tree structured conditional random fields. In Proceedings of the 20th international joint conference on Artifical intelligence, IJCAI'07, pp. 2060-2065.
5. Bassett, D. S., & Bullmore, E. (2006). Small-world brain networks. The neuroscientist, 12(6), 512-523.
6. Bird, S., Dale, R., Dorr, B. J., Gibson, B., Joseph, M., Kan, M.-Y., Lee, D., Powley, B., Radev, D. R., & Tan, Y. F. (2008). The acl anthology reference corpus: A reference dataset for bibliographic research in computational linguistics. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2008, 26 May - 1 June 2008, Marrakech, Morocco.
7. Bradshaw, S. (2002). Reference Directed Indexing: Indexing Scientific Literature in the Context of Its Use. Ph.D. thesis, Northwestern University.
8. Bradshaw, S. (2003). Reference directed indexing: Redeeming relevance for subject search in citation indexes. In Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries.
9. Carbonell, J. G., & Goldstein, J. (1998). The use of MMR, diversity-based reranking for reordering documents and producing summaries. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR-98), pp. 335-336.
10. Carletta, J. (1996). Assessing agreement on classification tasks: the kappa statistic. Computational Linguistics, 22(2), 249-254.
11. Charniak, E., Altun, Y., Braz, R. d. S., Garrett, B., Kosmala, M., Moscovich, T., Pang, L., Pyo, C., Sun, Y., Wy, W., Yang, Z., Zeller, S., & Zorn, L. (2000). Reading comprehension programs in a statistical-language- processing class. In Proceedings of the 2000 ANLP/NAACL Workshop on Reading comprehension tests as evaluation for computer-based language understanding sytems - Volume 6, ANLP/NAACL-ReadingComp '00, pp. 1-5.
12. Clauset, A., Newman, M. E. J., & Moore, C. (2004). Finding community structure in very large networks. Phys. Rev. E, 70(6), 066111.
13. Cohn, T., & Blunsom, P. (2005). Semantic role labelling with tree conditional random fields. In Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, pp. 169-172. Association for Computational Linguistics.
14. Das, D., & Martins, A. (2007). A survey on automatic text summarization. Literature Survey for the Language and Statistics II course at CMU, 4, 192-195.
15. Eisner, J. (1996). Three new probabilistic models for dependency parsing: An exploration. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-96), pp. 340-345. Association for Computational Linguistics.
16. Elkiss, A., Shen, S., Fader, A., Erkan, G., States, D., & Radev, D. R. (2008). Blind men and elephants: What do citation summaries tell us about a research article?. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(1), 51-62.
17. Erkan, G. (2006). Language model-based document clustering using random walks. In Proceedings of the HLT-NAACL conference, pp. 479-486, New York City, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
18. Erkan, G., & Radev, D. R. (2004). Lexrank: Graph-based centrality as salience in text summarization. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR).
19. Ferrer i Cancho, R., & Solé, R. V. (2001). The small-world of human language. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 268(1482), 2261-2265.
20. Finkel, J. R., Kleeman, A., & Manning, C. D. (2008). Efficient, feature-based, conditional random field parsing. In Proceedings of ACL-08: HLT, pp. 959-967, Columbus, Ohio. Association for Computational Linguistics.
21. Gildea, D., & Jurafsky, D. (2002). Automatic labeling of semantic roles. Comput. Linguist., 28(3), 245-288.
22. Harabagiu, S., Hickl, A., Lehmann, J., & Moldovan, D. (2005). Experiments with interactive question-answering. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL '05, pp. 205-214.
23. Hildebrandt, W., Katz, B., & Lin, J. (2004). Overview of the TREC 2003 question-answering track. In Proceedings of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics - Human Language Technologies (HLT-NAACL '04).
24. Hirschman, L., Light, M., Breck, E., & Burger, J. D. (1999). Deep read: a reading comprehension system. In Proceedings of the 37th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Computational Linguistics, ACL '99, pp. 325-332.
25. Hoang, C. D. V., & Kan, M.-Y. (2010). Towards automated related work summarization. In Proceedings of the 23nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-10), pp. 427-435, Beijing, China. Coling 2010 Organizing Committee.
26. Johansson, R., & Nugues, P. (2005). Sparse bayesian classification of predicate arguments. In Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL-2005), pp. 177-180, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Association for Computational Linguistics.
27. Joseph, M. T., & Radev, D. R. (2007). Citation analysis, centrality, and the ACL Anthology. Tech. rep. CSE-TR-535-07, University of Michigan. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science.
28. Jousse, F., Gilleron, R., Tellier, I., & Tommasi, M. (2006). Conditional random fields for xml trees. In In Workshop on Mining and Learning in Graphs.
29. Jun Hatori, Y. M., & Tsujii, J. On contribution of sense dependencies to word sense disambiguation. Journal of Natural Language Processing.
30. Jurafsky, D., & Martin, J. H. (2008). Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Speech Recognition, and Computational Linguistics (2nd edition). Prentice-Hall.
31. Kan, M.-Y., Klavans, J. L., & McKeown, K. R. (2002). Using the Annotated Bibliography as a Resource for Indicative Summarization. In The International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), Las Palmas, Spain.
32. Kaplan, D., Iida, R., & Tokunaga, T. (2009). Automatic extraction of citation contexts for research paper summarization: A coreference-chain based approach. In Proceedings of the 2009 Workshop on Text and Citation Analysis for Scholarly Digital Libraries, pp. 88-95, Suntec City, Singapore.
33. Kempe, D., Kleinberg, J., & Éva Tardos (2003). Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-09), pp. 137-146. ACM.
34. Klein, D., & Manning, C. D. (2003). Accurate unlexicalized parsing. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-03), pp. 423-430.
35. Koomen, P., Punyakanok, V., Roth, D., & Yih, W.-t. (2005). Generalized inference with multiple semantic role labeling systems. In Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL-2005), pp. 181-184, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Association for Computational Linguistics.
36. Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
37. Kupiec, J., Pedersen, J., & Chen, F. (1995). A trainable document summarizer. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR-95), pp. 68-73.
38. Lin, C.-Y. (2004). ROUGE: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries. In Proceedings of the ACL workshop on Text Summarization Branches Out.
39. Lin, J. J., & Demner-Fushman, D. (2006). Methods for automatically evaluating answers to complex questions. Information Retrieval, 9(5), 565-587.
40. Ma, X. (2000). Hong kong news parallel text. Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia.
41. Manning, C. D., Raghavan, P., & Schütze, H. (2008). Introduction to Information Retrieval. Cambridge University Press.
42. Màrquez, L., Comas, P., Giménez, J., & Català, N. (2005). Semantic role labeling as sequential tagging. In Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, CONLL '05, pp. 193-196.
43. Mei, Q., Guo, J., & Radev, D. (2010). Divrank: the interplay of prestige and diversity in information networks. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-10), pp. 1009-1018.
44. Mohammad, S., Dorr, B., Egan, M., Hassan, A., Muthukrishan, P., Qazvinian, V., Radev, D., & Zajic, D. (2009). Using citations to generate surveys of scientific paradigms. In Proceedings of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics - Human Language Technologies (HLT-NAACL '09), pp. 584-592, Boulder, Colorado.
45. Montoya, J. M., & Solé, R. V. (2002). Small world patterns in food webs. Journal of theoretical biology, 214(3), 405-412.
46. Nakov, P., D. A., & Hearst, M. (2012). Do peers see more in a paper than its authors?. Advances in Bioinformatics, special issue on Literature Mining Solutions for Life Science Research.
47. Nanba, H., Abekawa, T., Okumura, M., & Saito, S. (2004). Bilingual PRESRI: Integration of multiple research paper databases. In Proceedings of RIAO 2004, pp. 195-211, Avignon, France.
48. Nanba, H., Kando, N., & Okumura, M. (2000). Classification of research papers using citation links and citation types: Towards automatic review article generation. In Proceedings of the 11th SIG Classification Research Workshop, pp. 117-134, Chicago, USA.
49. Nanba, H., & Okumura, M. (1999). Towards multi-paper summarization using reference information. In Proceedings of the 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-99), pp. 926-931.
50. Nenkova, A., & Passonneau, R. (2004). Evaluating content selection in summarization: The pyramid method. In Proceedings of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics - Human Language Technologies (HLT-NAACL '04).
51. Newman, M. E. J. (2001). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. PNAS, 98(2), 404-409.
52. Newman, M. E. J. (2003). The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review, 45(2), 167-256.
53. Newman, M. E. J. (2004a). Analysis of weighted networks. Physical Review E, 70-056131.
54. Newman, M. E. J. (2004b). Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks. Phys. Rev. E, 69, 066133.
55. Newman, M. E. J., & Girvan, M. (2004). Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Phys. Rev. E, 69, 026113.
56. Ng, H. T., Teo, L. H., & Kwan, J. L. P. (2000). A machine learning approach to answering questions for reading comprehension tests. In Proceedings of the 2000 Joint SIGDAT conference on Empirical methods in natural language processing and very large corpora: held in conjunction with the 38th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics - Volume 13, EMNLP '00, pp. 124-132.
57. Paul, M., Zhai, C., & Girju, R. (2010). Summarizing contrastive viewpoints in opinionated text. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-10), pp. 66-76.
58. Pradhan, S., Hacioglu, K., Ward, W., Martin, J. H., & Jurafsky, D. (2005). Semantic role chunking combining complementary syntactic views. In Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, CONLL '05, pp. 217-220.
59. Punyakanok, V., Roth, D., & Yih, W. (2008). The importance of syntactic parsing and inference in semantic role labeling. Computational Linguistics, 34(2).
60. Qazvinian, V., & Radev, D. R. (2008). Scientific paper summarization using citation summary networks. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-08), Manchester, UK.
61. Qazvinian, V., & Radev, D. R. (2010). Identifying non-explicit citing sentences for citation-based summarization. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-10), pp. 555-564, Uppsala, Sweden.
62. Qazvinian, V., & Radev, D. R. (2011a). Exploiting phase transition in latent networks for clustering. In Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-11).
63. Qazvinian, V., & Radev, D. R. (2011b). Learning from collective human behavior to introduce diversity in lexical choice. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-11), pp. 1098-1108.
64. Radev, D., Allison, T., Blair-Goldensohn, S., Blitzer, J., Çelebi, A., Dimitrov, S., Drabek, E., Hakim, A., Lam, W., Liu, D., Otterbacher, J., Qi, H., Saggion, H., Teufel, S., Topper, M., Winkel, A., & Zhang, Z. (2004). MEAD - a platform for multidocument multilingual text summarization. In LREC 2004, Lisbon, Portugal.
65. Radev, D. R., Muthukrishnan, P., & Qazvinian, V. (2009). The ACL anthology network corpus. In ACL workshop on Natural Language Processing and Information Retrieval for Digital Libraries, Singapore.
66. Ravasz, E., Somera, A., Mongru, D., Oltvai, Z., & Barabási, A. (2002). Hierarchical organization of modularity in metabolic networks. Science, 297(5586), 1551.
67. Riloff, E., & Thelen, M. (2000). A rule-based question answering system for reading comprehension tests. In Proceedings of the 2000 ANLP/NAACL Workshop on Reading comprehension tests as evaluation for computer-based language understanding sytems - Volume 6, ANLP/NAACL-ReadingComp '00, pp. 13-19.
68. Rinaldi, F., Dowdall, J., Kaljurand, K., Hess, M., & Mollá, D. (2003). Exploiting paraphrases in a question answering system. In Proceedings of the second international workshop on Paraphrasing - Volume 16, PARAPHRASE '03, pp. 25-32.
69. Siddharthan, A., & Teufel, S. (2007). Whose idea was this, and why does it matter? attributing scientific work to citations. In Proceedings of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics - Human Language Technologies (HLT-NAACL '07).
70. Small, S., Liu, T., Shimizu, N., & Strzalkowski, T. (2003). Hitiqa: An interactive question answering system: A preliminary report. In Proceedings of the ACL 2003 Workshop on Multilingual Summarization and Question Answering.
71. Smyth, S., & White, S. (2005). A spectral clustering approach to finding communities in graphs. In Proceedings of the 5th SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 76-84.
72. Spärck-Jones, K. (1999). Automatic summarizing: factors and directions. In Mani, I., & Maybury, M. T. (Eds.), Advances in automatic text summarization, chap. 1, pp. 1 - 12. The MIT Press.
73. Tang, J., Hong, M., Li, J., & Liang, B. (2006). Tree-structured conditional random fields for semantic annotation. In Proceedings of the 5th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC'06), pp. 640-653.
74. Teufel, S. (2005). Argumentative Zoning for Improved Citation Indexing. Computing Attitude and Affect in Text: Theory and Applications, 159-170.
75. Teufel, S., & Moens, M. (2002). Summarizing scientific articles: experiments with relevance and rhetorical status. Computational Linguistics, 28(4), 409-445.
76. Teufel, S., Siddharthan, A., & Tidhar, D. (2006). Automatic classification of citation function. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-06), pp. 103-110, Sydney, Australia.
77. Thompson, C., Levy, R., & Manning, C. (2003). A generative model for FrameNet semantic role labeling. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth European Conference on Machine Learning ECML-2003, Croatia.
78. Tomuro, N. (2003). Interrogative reformulation patterns and acquisition of question paraphrases. In Proceedings of the second international workshop on Paraphrasing - Volume 16, PARAPHRASE '03, pp. 33-40.
79. Toutanova, K., Haghighi, A., & Manning, C. (2005). Joint learning improves semantic role labeling. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'05), pp. 589-596, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Association for Computational Linguistics.
80. Toutanova, K., Haghighi, A., & Manning, C. D. (2008). A global joint model for semantic role labeling. Comput. Linguist., 34(2), 161-191.
81. van Halteren, H., & Teufel, S. (2003). Examining the consensus between human summaries: initial experiments with factoid analysis. In Proceedings of the HLT-NAACL 03 on Text summarization workshop, pp. 57-64, Morristown, NJ, USA.
82. van Halteren, H., & Teufel, S. (2004). Evaluating information content by factoid analysis: human annotation and stability. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-04), Barcelona.
83. Voorhees, E. M. (1998). Variations in relevance judgments and the measurement of retrieval effectiveness. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR-98), pp. 315-323.
84. Voorhees, E. M. (2001). Overview of the TREC 2001 question answering track. In Text REtrieval Conference.
85. Voorhees, E. M. (2003). Overview of the TREC 2003 question answering track. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-2003).
86. Voorhees, E. M. (2005). Using question series to evaluate question answering system effectiveness. In In HLT/EMNLP 2005.
87. Wang, W., J., A., Parasuraman, R., Zubarev, I., Brandyberry, D., & Harper, M. (2000). A Question Answering System Developed as a Project in a Natural Language Processing Course. In In ANLP/NAACL Workshop on Reading Comprehension Tests as Evaluation for ComputerBased Language Understanding Systems.
88. Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. (1998). Collective dynamics of small-world networks. Nature, 393, 440-442.
89. Whidby, M. A. (2012). Citation handling: Processing citation texts in scientific documents. Master's thesis, University of Maryland, Department of Computer Science, College Park, MD.
90. Xue, N., & Palmer, M. (2004). Calibrating features for semantic role labeling. In Lin, D., & Wu, D. (Eds.), Proceedings of EMNLP 2004, pp. 88-94, Barcelona, Spain. Association for Computational Linguistics.
91. Zajic, D. M., Dorr, B. J., Lin, J., & Schwartz, R. (2007). Multi-candidate reduction: Sentence compression as a tool for document summarization tasks. Information Processing and Management (Special Issue on Summarization).
92. Zhao, Y., & Karypis, G. (2001). Criterion functions for document clustering: Experiments and analysis. Technical report TR #01-40, Department of Computer Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
93. Zhu, X., Goldberg, A., Van Gael, J., & Andrzejewski, D. (2007). Improving diversity in ranking using absorbing random walks. In Proceedings of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics - Human Language Technologies (HLT-NAACL '07), pp. 97-104.