Sound-induced flash illusion is resistant to feedback training

Brain Topography

Volumn 21, Issue 3-4, 2009, Pages 185-192

  Rosenthal, Orna ^a   Shimojo, Shinsuke ^b   Shams, Ladan ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Crossmodal integration; Learning; Reward; Visual perception

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONFERENCE PAPER; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; ILLUSION; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REWARD; TRAINING; VISUAL STIMULATION; ARTICLE; BRAIN; DECISION MAKING; HEARING; HISTOLOGY; LEARNING; METHODOLOGY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REFLEX; TEACHING; VISION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BRAIN; DECISION MAKING; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; LEARNING; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REFLEX; REWARD; TEACHING; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 70349581996     PISSN: 08960267     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10548-009-0090-9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Arden GB, Wolf JE, Messiter C (2003) Electrical activity in visual cortex associated with combined auditory and visual stimulation in temporal sequences known to be associated with a visual illusion. Vision Res 43(23):2469-2478
2. Bhattacharya J, Shams L, Shimojo S (2002) Sound-induced illusory flash perception: role of gamma band responses. Neuro Report 13:1727-1730
3. Coles MG, Gratton G, Bashore TR, Eriksen CW, Donchin E (1985) A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 11:529-553
4. Gold JI, Shadlen MN (2002) Banburismus and the brain: decoding the relationship between sensory stimuli, decisions, and reward. Neuron 36:299-308
5. Gorea A, Sagi D (2000) Failure to handle more than one internal representation in visual detection tasks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97:12380-12384
6. Herzog MH, Fahle M (1997) The role of feedback in learning a vernier discrimination task. Vision Res 37:2133-2141
7. Macmillan NA, Creelman CD (1991) Detection theory: a user's guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
8. Mishra J, Martinez A, Sejnowski T, Hillyard SA (2007) Early crossmodal interactions in auditory and visual cortex underlie a sound-induced visual illusion. J Neurosci 27(15):4120-4131
9. Shams L, Kamitani Y, Shimojo S (2000) What you see is what you hear. Nature 408:788
10. Shams L, Kamitani Y, Thompson S, Shimojo S (2001) Sound alters visual evoked potentials in humans. Neuro Report 12(17):3849-3852 (Pubitemid 33105184)
11. Shams L, Kamitani Y, Shimojo S (2002) Visual illusion induced by sound. Cogn Brain Res 14:147-152
12. Shams L, Iwaki S, Chawla A, Bhattacharya J (2005) Early Modulation of visual cortex by sound: an MEG study. Neurosci Lett 378(2):76-81
13. Watkins S, Shams L, Tanaka S, Haynes J-D, Rees G (2006) Sound alters activity in human V1 in association with illusory visual perception. Neuroimage 31:1247-1256
14. Watkins S, Shams L, Josephs O, Rees G (2007) Activity in human V1 follows multisensory perception. Neuroimage 37:572-578
15. Wozny DR, Beierholm UR, Shams L (2008) Human trimodal perception follows optimal statistical inference. J Vis 8(3): 24.1-24.11
16. Yu C, Klein SA, Levi DM (2004) Perceptual learning in contrast discrimination and the(minimal) role of context. J Vis 4(3):169-182