A Bead Aggregation Assay for Detection of Low-Affinity Protein-Protein Interactions Reveals Interactions between N-Terminal Domains of Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate Receptors

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2013, Pages

  Chavda, Alap P ^a   Prole, David L ^a   Taylor, Colin W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOUBLE STRANDED DNA; INOSITOL 1,4,5 TRISPHOSPHATE RECEPTOR;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BEAD AGGREGATION ASSAY; BINDING AFFINITY; BIOTINYLATION; CALCIUM CELL LEVEL; DNA SEQUENCE; MACROMOLECULE; MATERIAL COATING; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DETERMINATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN IMMOBILIZATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; IMMOBILIZED PROTEINS; IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; INOSITOL 1,4,5-TRISPHOSPHATE; INOSITOL 1,4,5-TRISPHOSPHATE RECEPTORS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; RATS;

EID: 84875420515     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060609     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Nooren IM, Thornton JM, (2003) Diversity of protein-protein interactions. EMBO J 22: 3486-3492.
2. Jones S, Thornton JM, (1996) Principles of protein-protein interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 13-20.
3. Aloy P, Russell RB, (2006) Structural systems biology: modelling protein interactions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7: 188-197.
4. Nooren IM, Thornton JM, (2003) Structural characterisation and functional significance of transient protein-protein interactions. J Mol Biol 325: 991-1018.
5. Perkins JR, Diboun I, Dessailly BH, Lees JG, Orengo C, (2010) Transient protein-protein interactions: structural, functional, and network properties. Structure 18: 1233-1243.
6. Mintseris J, Weng Z, (2005) Structure, function, and evolution of transient and obligate protein-protein interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 10930-10935.
7. Van Criekinge W, Beyaert R, (1999) Yeast two-hybrid: state of the art. Biol Proced Online 2: 1-38.
8. Sidhu SS, Koide S, (2007) Phage display for engineering and analyzing protein interaction interfaces. Curr Opin Struct Biol 17: 481-487.
9. Phizicky EM, Fields S, (1995) Protein-protein interactions: methods for detection and analysis. Microbiol Rev 59: 94-123.
10. Howlett GJ, Minton AP, Rivas G, (2006) Analytical ultracentrifugation for the study of protein association and assembly. Curr Opin Chem Biol 10: 430-436.
11. Berridge MJ, Bootman MD, Roderick HL, (2003) Calcium signalling: dynamics, homeostasis and remodelling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4: 517-529.
12. Lin CC, Baek K, Lu Z, (2011) Apo and InsP3-bound crystal structures of the ligand-binding domain of an InsP3 receptor. Nat Struct Mol Biol 18: 1172-1174.
13. Seo MD, Velamakanni S, Ishiyama N, Stathopulos PB, Rossi AM, et al. (2012) Structural and functional conservation of key domains in InsP3 and ryanodine receptors. Nature 483: 108-112.
14. Berridge MJ, Lipp P, Bootman MD, (2000) The versatility and universality of calcium signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 1: 11-21.
15. Choe C, Ehrlich BE, (2006) The inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor (IP3R) and its regulators: sometimes good and sometimes bad teamwork. Science STKE re 15.
16. Patterson RL, Boehning D, Snyder SH, (2004) Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors as signal integrators. Annu Rev Biochem 73: 437-465.
17. Rusakov DA, Podini P, Villa A, Meldolesi J, (1993) Tridimensional organization of Purkinje neuron cisternal stacks, a specialized endoplasmic reticulum subcompartment rich in inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors. J Neurocytol 22: 273-282.
18. Takei K, Mignery GA, Mugnaini E, Südhof TC, De Camilli P, (1994) Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor causes formation of ER cisternal stacks in transfected fibroblasts and in cerebellar Purkinje cells. Neuron 12: 327-342.
19. Hamada K, Terauchi A, Mikoshiba K, (2003) Three-dimensional rearrangements with inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor by calcium. J Biol Chem 278: 52881-52889.
20. Uchida K, Miyauchi H, Furuichi T, Michikawa T, Mikoshiba K, (2003) Critical regions for activation gating of the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor. J Biol Chem 278: 16551-16560.
21. Szlufcik K, Bultynck G, Callewaert G, Missiaen L, Parys JB, et al. (2006) The suppressor domain of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor plays an essential role in the protection against apoptosis. Cell Calcium 39: 325-336.
22. Fabrini R, De Luca A, Stella L, Mei G, Orioni B, et al. (2009) Monomer-dimer equilibrium in glutathione transferases: a critical re-examination. Biochemistry 48: 10473-10482.
23. Rossi AM, Riley AM, Tovey SC, Rahman T, Dellis O, et al. (2009) Synthetic partial agonists reveal key steps in IP3 receptor activation. Nat Chem Biol 5: 631-639.
24. Tateishi Y, Hattori M, Nakayama T, Iwai M, Bannai H, et al. (2005) Cluster formation of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor requires its transition to open state. J Biol Chem 280: 6816-6822.
25. Rahman TU, Skupin A, Falcke M, Taylor CW, (2009) Clustering of IP3 receptors by IP3 retunes their regulation by IP3 and Ca2+. Nature 458: 655-659.
26. Ding Z, Rossi AM, Riley AM, Rahman T, Potter BVL, et al. (2010) Binding of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) and adenophostin A to the N-terminal region of the IP3 receptor: thermodynamic analysis using fluorescence polarization with a novel IP3 receptor ligand. Mol Pharm 77: 995-1004.
27. Leunissen EM, Dreyfus R, Sha R, Wang T, Seeman CN, et al. (2009) Towards self-replicating materials of DNA-functionalized colloids. Soft Matter pp. 2422-2430.