Institutional repositories: Exploration of costs and value

D-Lib Magazine

Volumn 19, Issue 1-2, 2013, Pages

  Burns, C Sean ^a   Lana, Amy ^a   Budd, John M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875406509     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10829873     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1045/january2013-burns     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Aguillo, I.F., Ortega, J.L., Fernández, M., & Utrilla, A.M. (2010). Indicators for a webometric ranking of open access repositories. Scientometrics, 82(3), 477-486. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0183-y
2. Albanese, A., & Oder, N. (2008). Harvard faculty unanimously agree to establish open access repository. Library Journal.
3. Arlitsch, K., & O'Brien, P.S. (2012). Invisible institutional repositories: Addressing the low indexing ratios of IRs in Google Scholar. Library Hi Tech, 30(1), 60-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/07378831211213210
4. Barton, M.R., & Walker, J.H. (2003). Building a business plan for DSpace, MIT Libraries digital institutional repository. Journal of Digital Information, 4(2). http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/26700
5. Bevan, S.J. (2007). Developing an institutional repository: Cranfield QUEprints - a case study. OCLC Systems & Services, 23(2), 170-182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10650750710748478
6. Carpenter, M., Graybill, J., Offord Jr., J., & Piorun, M. (2011). Envisioning the library's role in scholarly communication in the year 2025. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 11(2), 659-681.
7. Chan, L. (2004). Supporting and enhancing scholarship in the digital age: The role of open-access institutional repositories. Canadian Journal of Communication, 29(3).
8. Chen, H., Kochtanek, T., Burns, C., & Shaw, R. (2010). Analyzing users' retrieval behaviors and image queries of a photojournalism image database. The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 34(3), 249-268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/ils.2010.0003
9. Chen, X. (2010). Google Scholar's dramatic coverage improvement five years after debut. Serials Review, 36(4), 221-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2010.08.002
10. Cothran, T. (2011). Google Scholar acceptance and use among graduate students: A quantitative study. Library & Information Science Research, 33(4), 293-301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2011.02.001
11. Crow, R. (2002). The case for institutional repositories: A SPARC position paper (Release 1.0).
12. Cullen, R., & Chawner, B. (2009). Institutional repositories and the role of academic libraries in scholarly communication. Paper presented at the Asia-Pacific Conference on Library & Information Education & Practice.
13. Darby, R.M., Jones, C.M., Gilbert, L.D., & Lambert, S.C. (2009). Increasing the productivity of interactions between subject and institutional repositories. New Review of Information Networking, 14(2), 117-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13614570903359381
14. Davis, P.M., & Connolly, M.J.L. (2007). Institutional repositories: Evaluating the reasons for non-use of Cornell University's installation of DSpace. D-Lib Magazine 13(3/4). http://dx.doi.org/10.1045/march2007-davis
15. Davis, P.M., & Fromerth, M.J. (2007). Does the arXiv lead to higher citations and reduced publisher downloads for mathematics articles? Scientometrics, 71(2), 203-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1661-8
16. DuraSpace. Google Scholar Metadata Mappings. n.d.
17. Edgar, B.D., & Willinsky, J. (2010). A survey of scholarly journals using open journal systems. Scholarly and Research Communication, 1(2).
18. Gargouri, Y., Hajjem, C., Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., Carr, L., Brody, T., & Harnad, S. (2010). Self-Selected or mandated, open access increases citation impact for higher quality research. PLoS ONE, 5(10):e13636+. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013636
19. Giesecke, J. (2011). Institutional repositories: Keys to success. Journal of Library Administration, 51(5-6), 529-542. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2011.589340
20. Google. Webmaster Tools. n.d.
21. Greco, A.N., Wharton, R.M., Estelami, H., & Jones, R.F. (2006). The state of scholarly publishing: 1981-2000. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 37(3), 155-214.
22. Guédon, J-C. (2008). Mixing and matching the green and gold roads to open access-Take 2. Serials Review, 34(1), 41-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2007.12.008
23. Harnad, S. What is Open Access?. n.d.
24. Harnad, S., Brody, T., Vallières, F., Carr, L, Hitchcock, S., Gingras, Y., Oppenheim, C., Hajjem, C., & Hilf, E.R. (2008). The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to open access: An update. Serials Review, 34(1), 36-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2007.12.005
25. Heath, F.M. (2009). The University of Texas: Looking forward: Research libraries in the 21st century. Journal of Library Administration, 49(3), 311-324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01930820902785413
26. Kim, J. (2011). Motivations of faculty self-archiving in institutional repositories. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(3), 246-254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2011.02.017
27. Knowles, C. (2012). Surfacing Google Analytics in DSpace. n.d.
28. Li, Y., & Banach, M. (2011). Institutional repositories and digital preservation: Assessing current practices at research libraries. D-Lib Magazine, 17(5/6). http://dx.doi.org/10.1045/may2011-yuanli
29. Lynch, C.A. (2003). Institutional repositories: Essential structure for scholarship in the digital age. ARL Bimonthly Report, No 226.
30. Lynch, C.A., & Lippincott, J.K. (2005). Institutional repository deployment in the United States as of early 2005. D-Lib Magazine 11(9). http://dx.doi.org/10.1045/september2005-lynch
31. MIT Libraries. MIT's DSpace Experience: A Case Study. n.d.
32. Moore, G. (2011). Survey of University of Toronto Faculty Awareness, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Scholarly Communication: A Preliminary Report. Toronto: University of Toronto.
33. Mower, A., & Chaufty, L. (2009). Do something no one has imagined: The 2008 SPARC Digital Repositories meeting. College & Research Libraries News, 70(3), 158-160.
34. Norris, M., Oppenheim, C., & Rowland, F. (2008). Finding open access articles using Google, Google Scholar, OAIster and OpenDOAR. Online Information Review, 32(6), 709-715. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14684520810923881
35. Pascarelli, A.M. (1990). Coping strategies for libraries facing the serials crisis. Serials Review, 16(1), 75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0098-7913(90)90045-Z
36. Piorun, M., & Palmer, L.A. (2008). Digitizing dissertations for an institutional repository: A process and cost analysis. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 96(3), 223-229. http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.96.3.008
37. Plutchak, T.S. (2012). Breaking the barriers of time and space: The dawning of the great age of librarians. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 100(1), 10-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.100.1.004
38. Prosser, D. (2003). Institutional repositories and Open Access: The future of scholarly communication. Information Services & Use, 23(2003), 167-170.
39. R Development Core Team. (2011). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
40. Rieh, S.Y., Markey, K., St. Jean, B., Yakel, E., & Kim, J. (2007). Census of institutional repositories in the U.S.: A comparison across institutions at different states of IR development. D-Lib Magazine 13(11/12). http://dx.doi.org/10.1045/november2007-rieh
41. Shotton, D. (2012). The five stars of online journal articles - a framework for article evaluation. D-Lib Magazine, 18(1/2). http://dx.doi.org/10.1045/january2012-shotton
42. Tansley, R., & Harnad, S. (2000). Eprints.org software for creating institutional and individual open archives. D-Lib Magazine, 6(10).
43. Thomas, C., & McDonald, R.H. (2007). Measuring and comparing participation patterns in digital repositories: Repositories by the numbers, part 1. D-Lib Magazine 13(9/10). http://dx.doi.org/10.1045/september2007-mcdonald
44. Waaijers, L., Savenije, B., & Wesseling, M. (2008). Copyright angst, lust for prestige and cost control: What institutions can do to ease open access. Ariadne, 57.
45. Wacha, M., & Wisner, M. (2011). Measuring value in open access repositories. The Serials Librarian, 61(3-4), 377-388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2011.580423
46. Xia, J. (2008). A comparison of subject and institutional repositories in self-archiving practices. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(6), 489-495. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2008.09.016
47. Zhu, L. (2012). The role of paraprofessionals in technical services in academic libraries. Library Resources & Technical Services, 56(3), 127-154.