Public attitudes to financial incentive models for organs: A literature review suggests that it is time to shift the focus from 'financial incentives' to 'reciprocity'

Transplant International

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 350-357

  Hoeyer, Klaus ^a   Schicktanz, Silke ^b   Deleuran, Ida ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

financial incentives; organ donation; public attitudes; review

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HUMAN; ORGAN DONOR; ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

HUMANS; LIVING DONORS; MOTIVATION; PUBLIC OPINION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; TISSUE AND ORGAN PROCUREMENT;

EID: 84875382651     PISSN: 09340874     EISSN: 14322277     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/tri.12060     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. Bosisio F, Santiago M, Benaroyo L,. Financial incentives to improve organ donation: what is the opinion of the Vaud French-speaking population? Swiss Med Wkly 2011; 141: w13312.
2. Boulware LE, Troll MU, Wang NY, Powe NR,. Public attitudes toward incentives for organ donation: a national study of different racial/ethnic and income groups. Am J Transplant 2006; 6: 2774.
3. Bryce CL, Siminoff LA, Ubel PA, Nathan H, Caplan A, Arnold RM,. Do incentives matter? Providing to benefits to families of organ donors. Am J Transplant 2005; 5: 2999.
4. Budiani-Saberi D, Mostafa A,. Care for commercial living donors: the experience of an NGO's outreach in Egypt. Transplant Int 2010; 24: 317.
5. Cantarovich F, Heguilén R, Filho M, et al,. An international opinion poll of well-educated people regarding awareness and feelings about organ donation for transplantation. Transplant Int 2007; 20: 512.
6. Danguilan RA, De Belen-Uriarte R, Jorge SL, et al,. National survey of Filipinos on acceptance of incentivized organ donation. Transplant Proc 2012; 44: 839.
7. Decker O, Beutel M, Winter M, Brähler E,. Sex sells? Gender imbalance and incentives-the attitudes toward organ donation in Germany. Trandsplantationsmedizin 2008; 20: 53.
8. El-Shoubaki H, Bener A,. Public knowledge and attitudes toward organ donation and transplantation: a cross-cultural study. Transplant Proc 2005; 37: 1993.
9. Haddow G,. 'Because you're worth it?' The taking and selling of transplantable organs. J Med Ethics 2006; 32: 324.
10. Halpern S, Raz A, Kohn R, Rey M, Asch D, Reese P,. Regulated payments for living kidney donation: an empirical assessment of the ethical concerns. Ann Intern Med 2010; 152: 358.
11. Kennedy K,. Organ donation and transplantation in India: an Inquiry in Kerala. J Soc Distress Homel 2002; 11: 41.
12. Kranenburg L, Schram A, Zuidema W, et al,. Public survey of financial incentives for kidney donation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008; 23: 1039.
13. Leider S, Roth AE,. Kidneys for sale: who disapproves, and why? Am J Transplant 2010; 10: 1221.
14. Mayrhofer-Reinhartshuber D, Fitzgerald A, Benetka G, Fitzgerald R,. Effects of financial incentives on the intention to consent to organ donation. A questionnaire survey. Transplant Proc 2006; 38: 2756.
15. Mazaris EM, Crane JS, Warrens AN, Smith G, Tekkis P, Papalois V,. Attitudes toward live donor kidney transplantation and its commercialization. Clin Transplant 2011; 25: E312.
16. Moazam F, Zaman RM, Jafarey AM,. Conversations with kidney vendors in Pakistan: an ethnographic study. Hastings Cent Rep 2009; 39: 29.
17. Neuberger J, Farber L, Corrado M, O'Dell C,. Living liver donation: a survey of the attitudes of the public in Great Britain. Transplantation 2003; 76: 1260.
18. Rodrigue JR, Cornell DL, Howard RJ,. Attitudes toward financial incentives, donor authorization, and presumed consent among next-of-kin who consented vs. refused organ donation. Transplantation 2006; 81: 1249.
19. Schweda M, Schicktanz S,. The 'spare parts person?' Conceptions of the human body and their implications for public attitudes towards organ donation and organ sale. Philos Ethics Humanit Med 2009; 4: 4.
20. Schweda M, Wöhlke S, Schicktanz S,. Understanding public skepticism toward organ donation and its commercialization: the important role of reciprocity. Transplant Proc 2009; 41: 2509.
21. Schweda M, Schicktanz S,. Public ideas and values concerning the commercialization of organ donation in four European countries. Soc Sci Med 2009; 68: 1129.
22. Tober DM,. Kidneys and controversies in the Islamic republic of Iran: the case of organ sale. Body Soc 2007; 13: 151.
23. Van Buren MC, Massey EK, Maasdam L, et al,. For love or money? Attitudes toward financial incentives among actual living kidney donors. Am J Transplant 2010; 10: 2488.
24. Working Group on Incentives for Living Donation. Incentives for organ donation: proposed standards for an internationally acceptable system. Am J Transplant 2012; 12: 306.
25. Satel S,. Introduction. In:, Satel S, ed. When Altruism isn't Enough. The Case for Compensating Kidney Donors. Washington DC: The AEI Press, 2008: 1.
26. Sharp LA,. Bodies, Commodities, and Biotechnologies. Death, mourning, and scientific desire in the realm of human organ transfer. New York: Columbia University Press, 2007.
27. Tilney N, Chapman J, Delmonico F,. Debate on financial incentives is off the mark of national and international realities. Transplantation 2010; 89: 906.
28. Nuffield council on bioethics. Human Bodies: Donation for Medicine and Research. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics, 2011.
29. Kranenburg L, Weimar W,. Incentives for living kidney donation: what does the public think? Transplantation 2008; 86: 500.
30. Outhwaite W, Turner ST,. The SAGE Handbook of Social Science Methodology. London, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2007.
31. Dixon-Woods M, Fitzpatrick R, Roberts K,. Including qualitative research in systematic reviews: opportunities and problems. J Eval Clin Pract 2000; 7: 125.
32. Liberati A., Altman D., Tetzlaff J, et al,. The Prisma statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analysis of studies that evaluate health care interventions. Explanations and elaboration. BMJ 2009; 339: b2700.
33. Noblit GW, Hare RD,. Meta-ethnography. Synthesizing Qualitative Studies. Qualitative research methods series 11. London: A sage university paper, 1988.
34. Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden A, et al,. Guidance on the Conduct of Narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. Final Report. Swindon: ESRC Methods Programme, 2006.
35. Morton RL, Tong A, Howard K, Snelling P, Webster AC,. The views of patients and carers in treatment decision making for chronic kidney disease: systematic review: thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. BMJ 2010; 340: c112s.
36. Fox RC, Swazey JP,. Spare Parts: Organ Replacement in American Society. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
37. Cohen L,. The other kidney: biopolitics beyond recognition. Body Soc 2001; 7: 9.
38. Scheper-Hughes N,. The body of the terrorist. Body parts, bio-piracy and the spoils of war at Israel's national forensic institute. CounterPunch 2010; 17: 1.
39. Scheper-Hughes N,. The global traffic in human organs. Curr Anthr 2000; 41: 191.
40. Zargooshi J,. Quality of life of Iranian kidney "donors". J Urol 2001; 166: 1790.
41. Lippmann W,. The phantom public. With a new introduction by Wilfred M. McClay. London: Transaction Publishers, 1927.
42. Guttmann A, Guttmann RD,. Attitudes of healthcare professionals and the public towards the sale of kidneys for transplantation. J Med Ethics 1993; 19: 148.
43. Radcliffe-Richards J, Daar AS, Guttmann RD, et al,. The case for allowing kidney sales. Lancet 1998; 351: 1950.
44. Tong A, Howard K, Cass A, et al,. Community preferences for the allocation of solid organs for transplantation: a systematic review. Transplantation 2010; 89: 796.
45. Glazier AK,. The principles of gift law and the regulation of organ donation. Transplant Int 2011; 24: 368.
46. Davis CL,. How to increase living donation. Transplant Int 2011; 24: 344.