Understanding Public Skepticism Toward Organ Donation and Its Commercialization: The Important Role of Reciprocity

Transplantation Proceedings

Volumn 41, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 2509-2511

  Schweda, M ^a   Wohlke S ^a   Schicktanz, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVERTIZING; ARTICLE; CADAVER DONOR; GERMANY; HUMAN; LIVING DONOR; ORGAN DONOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC OPINION;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; GERMANY; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MORALS; POLITICS; PUBLIC OPINION; PUBLIC RELATIONS; TISSUE AND ORGAN PROCUREMENT;

EID: 68949212218     PISSN: 00411345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.06.109     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Radcliffe-Richards J., Daar A.S., Guttmann R.D., et al. The case for allowing kidney sales. Lancet 351 (1998) 1950
2. Cherry M.J. Kidney for sale by owner: human organs, transplantation and the market (2005), Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC
3. Kranenburg L.W., Schram A., Zuidema W., et al. Public survey of financial incentives for kidney donation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 23 (2008) 1039
4. Boulware L.E., Troll M.U., Wang N.Y., et al. Public attitudes toward incentives for organ donation: a national study of different racial/ethnic and income groups. Am J Transplant 6 (2006) 2774
5. Haddow G. "Because you're worth it?" The taking and selling of transplantable organs. J Med Ethics 32 (2006) 324
6. Morgan D.L. Focus groups as qualitative research (1997), Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif
7. Schweda M., and Schicktanz S. Public ideas and values concerning the commercialization of organ donation in four European countries. Soc Sci Med 68 (2009) 1129
8. Mayring P. Qualitative content analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung 1 2 (2000)
9. Strauss A.L. Basics of qualitative research. Grounded theory procedures and techniques (1990), Sage, Newbury Park, Calif
10. Schicktanz S., Schweda M., and Franzen M. 'In a completely different light'?-The role of being affected for epistemic perspectives and moral attitudes of patients, relatives and lay people. Med, Health Care Philosophy 11 (2008) 57
11. Daar A.S. Rewarded gifting. Transplant Proc 24 (1992) 2207
12. Nadel M.S., and Nadel C.A. Using reciprocity to motivate organ donations. Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics 5 (2005) 293
13. Mayrhofer-Reinhartshuber D., Fitzgerald A., Benetka G., et al. Effects of financial incentives on the intention to consent to organ donation: a questionnaire survey. Transplant Proc 38 (2006) 2756
14. Gubernatis G. Solidarity model as nonmonetary incentive could increase organ donation and justice in organ allocation at the same time. Transplant Proc 29 (1997) 3264