Attitudes toward financial incentives, donor authorization, and presumed consent among next-of-kin who consented vs. refused organ donation

Transplantation

Volumn 81, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 1249-1256

  Rodrigue, James R ^a   Cornell, Danielle L ^b   Howard, Richard J ^c  

^a BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b LifeQuest Organ Recovery Services   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Financial incentives; Organ donation; Presumed consent

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; CONTROLLED STUDY; FAMILY ATTITUDE; FEMALE; FINANCE; FINANCIAL INCENTIVE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; ORGAN DONOR; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; TELEPHONE;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTITUDE; CONTINENTAL POPULATION GROUPS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FAMILY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REFUSAL TO PARTICIPATE; TISSUE DONORS;

EID: 33744460488     PISSN: 00411337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000203165.49905.4a     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. 2004 Annual Report of the U.S. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients: Transplant Data 1994-2003. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Healthcare Systems Bureau, Division ot Transplantation, Rockville, MD; United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, VA; University Renal Research and Education Association, Ann Arbor, MI.
2. Delmonico FL, Sheehy E, Marks WH, et al. Organ donation and utilization in the United States, 2004. Am J Transplant 2005; 5: 862-873.
3. Radecki CM, Jaccard J. Psychological aspects of organ donation: a critical review and synthesis of individual and next-of-kin donation decisions. Health Psychol 1997; 16: 183-195.
4. Sheehy E, Conrad SL, Brigham LE, et al. Estimating the number of potential organ donors in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 667-674.
5. Callender CO, Hall MB, Branch D. An assessment of the effectiveness of the Mottep model for increasing donation rates and preventing the need for transplantation - adult findings: program years 1998 and 1999. Semin Nephrol 2001; 21: 419-428.
6. Shafer TJ, Davis KD, Holtzman SM, et al. Location of in-house organ procurement organization staff in level I trauma centers increases conversion of potential donors to actual donors. Transplantation 2003; 75: 1330-1335.
7. Arnold R, Bartlett S, Bernat J, et al. Financial incentives for cadaver organ donation: an ethical reappraisal. Transplantation 2002; 73: 1361-1367.
8. Siminoff LA, Leonard MD. Financial incentives: alternatives to the altruistic model of organ donation. J Transpl Coord 1999; 9: 250-256.
9. Delmonico FL, Arnold R, Scheper-Hughes N, et al. Ethical incentives - not payment - for organ donation. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 2002-2005.
10. Financial incentives for organ procurement. Ethical aspects of future contracts for cadaveric donors. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association. Arch Intern Med 1995; 155: 581-589.
11. Kishore RR. Human organs, scarcities, and sale: morality revisited. J Med Ethics 2005; 31: 362-365.
12. Peters TG. Life or death. The issue of payment in cadaveric organ donation. JAMA 265: 1302-1305.
13. American Transplant Congress 2005. Am J Transplant 2005; 11(suppl): 54-576.
14. Gill MB. Presumed consent, autonomy, and organ donation. J Med Philos 2004; 29: 37-59.
15. Johnson EJ, Goldstein DG. Defaults and donation decisions. Transplantation 2004; 78: 1713-1716.
16. Evans JH. Commodifying life? A pilot study of opinions regarding financial incentives for organ donation. J Health Polit Policy Law 2003; 28: 1003-1032.
17. Kittur DS, Hogan MM, Thukral VK, et al. Incentives for organ donation? Lancet 1991; 2: 1441-1443.
18. Sehgal AR, LeBeau SO, Youngner SJ. Dialysis patient attitudes toward financial incentives for kidney donation. Am J Kidney Dis 1997; 29: 410-418.
19. Oz MC, Kherani AR, Rowe A, et al. How to improve organ donation: results of the ISHLT/FACT poll. J Heart Lung Transplant 2003; 22: 389-410.
20. Wendler D, Dickert N. The consent process for cadaveric organ procurement: How does it work? How can it be improved? JAMA 2001; 285: 329-333.
21. Jasper JD, Nickerson CA, Ubel PA, Asch DA. Altruism, incentives, and organ donation: attitudes of the transplant community. Med Care 2004; 42: 378-386.
22. Siminoff LA, Gordon N, Hewlett J, Arnold RM. Factors influencing families' consent for donation of solid organs for transplantation. JAMA 2001; 286: 71-77.
23. Burroughs TE, Hong BA, Kappel DF, Freedman BK. The stability of family decisions to consent or refuse organ donation: would you do it again? Psychosom Med 1998; 60: 156-162.
24. DeJong W, Franz HG, Wolfe SM, et al. Requesting organ donation: an interview study of donor and nondonor families. Am J Crit Care 1998; 7: 13-23.
25. Prohibition of organ purchases. The National Organ Transplant Act; 98-507 42 U.S.C. 274e. 1984. Title III §301.
26. The Gallup Organization, Inc. The American Public's Attitudes Toward Organ Donation and Transplantation, conducted for The Partnership tor Organ Donation. Boston; February 1993.
27. Harmon-Jones E. Cognitive dissonance: progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology: Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1999.
28. Roels L, De Meester J. The relative impact of presumed-consent legislation on thoracic organ donation in the Eurotransplant area. J Transpl Coord 1996; 6: 174-177.
29. Johnson EJ, Goldstein D. Medicine - Do defaults save lives? Science 2003; 302: 1338-1339.
30. Gnant MF, Wamser P, Goetzinger P, et al. The impact of the presumed consent law and a decentralized organ procurement system on organ donation: quadruplication in the number of organ donors. Transplant Proc 1991; 23: 2685-2686.
31. Roels L, Vanrenterghem Y, Waer M, et al. Three years of experience with a 'presumed consent' legislation in Belgium: its impact on multi-organ donation in comparison with other European countries. The Leuven Collaborative Group tor Transplantation. Transplant Proc 1991; 23: 903-904.
32. Gimbel RW, Strosberg MA, Lehrman SE, et al. Presumed consent and other predictors of cadaveric organ donation in Europe. Prog Transplant 2003; 13: 17-23.
33. Kennedy I, Sells RA, Daar AS, et al. The case for "presumed consent" in organ donation. International Forum for Transplant Ethics. Lancet 1998; 351: 1650-1652.