Performance ranking of units considering ideal and anti-ideal DMU with common weights

Applied Mathematical Modelling

Volumn 37, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 6301-6310

  Sun, Jiasen ^a   Wu, Jie ^a   Guo, Dong ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

^b ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING INSTITUTE   (China)

Author keywords

Common weights; Data envelopment analysis (DEA); Ranking

Indexed keywords

COMMON WEIGHTS; LEAD FRAME; MAXIMUM EFFICIENCY; PERFORMANCE RANKINGS; RANKING; RESEARCH GAPS;

FLEXIBLE MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS;

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS;

EID: 84875379556     PISSN: 0307904X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2013.01.010     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1978, 2(6):429-444.
2. Davoodi A., Rezai Z.H. Common set of weights in data envelopment analysis: a linear programming problem. Cent. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2012, 20(2):355-365.
3. Yu M.M., Chen P.C. Measuring air routes performance using a fractional network data envelopment analysis model. Cent. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2011, 19(1):81-98.
4. Wang Y.M., Chin K.S. A new approach for the selection of advanced manufacturing technologies: DEA with double frontiers. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2009, 47(23):6663-6679.
5. Wang Y.M., Chin K.S., Leung J. A note on application of the data envelopment analytic hierarchy process for supplier selection. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2009, 47(11):3121-3138.
6. Wang Y.M., Luo Y., Lan Y.X. Common weights for fully ranking decision making units by regression analysis. Expert Syst. Appl. 2011, 38(8):9122-9128.
7. Sexton T.R., Silkman R.H., Hogan A.J. Data envelopment analysis: critique and extensions. Measuring Efficiency: An assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis 1986, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. R.H. Silkman (Ed.).
8. Kao C., Hung H.T. Data envelopment analysis with common weights: the compromise solution approach. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 2005, 56(10):1196-1203.
9. Ganley J.A., Cubbin S.A. Public sector efficiency measurement: applications of data envelopment analysis 1992, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
10. Roll Y., Cook W.D., Golany B. Controlling factor weights in data envelopment analysis. IIE Trans. 1991, 23(1):2-9.
11. Roll Y., Golany B. Alternate methods of treating factor weights in DEA. Omega 1993, 21(1):99-109.
12. Sinuany-Stern Z., Friedman L. DEA and the discriminant analysis of ratios for ranking units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1998, 111(3):470-478.
13. Liu F.H.F., Peng H.H. Ranking of units on the DEA frontier with common weights. Comput. Oper. Res. 2008, 35(5):1624-1637.
14. Jahanshahloo G.R., Lotfi F.H., Khanmohammadi M., et al. Ranking of units by positive ideal DMU with common weights. Expert Syst. Appl. 2010, 37(12):7483-7488.
15. Despotis D.K. Improving the discriminating power of DEA: focus on globally efficient units. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 2002, 53(3):314-323.
16. Entani T., Maeda Y., Tanaka H. Dual models of interval DEA and its extension to interval data. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2002, 136(1):32-45.
17. Wang Y.M., Luo Y. DEA efficiency assessment using ideal and anti-ideal decision making units. Appl. Math. Comput. 2006, 173(2):902-915.
18. Wu D. A note on DEA Efficiency assessment using ideal point: an improvement of Wang and Luo's model. Appl. Math. Comput. 2006, 183(2):819-830.
19. Wang Y.M., Chin K.S., Luo Y. Cross-efficiency evaluation based on ideal and anti-ideal decision making units. Expert Syst. Appl. 2011, 38(8):10312-10319.
20. Chang S.Y., Chen T.H. Performance ranking of Asian lead frame firms: a slack-based method in data envelopment analysis. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2008, 46(14):3875-3885.
21. Shang J., Sueyoshi T. A unified framework for the selection of a flexible manufacturing system. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1995, 85(2):297-315.