A note on DEA efficiency assessment using ideal point: An improvement of Wang and Luo's model

Applied Mathematics and Computation

Volumn 183, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 819-830

  Wu, Desheng ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Data envelopment analysis (DEA); Efficiency; Technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS); The negative ideal point (NIP); The positive ideal point (PIP)

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; DECISION MAKING; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; PROBLEM SOLVING;

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS (DEA); NEGATIVE IDEAL POINT (NIP); POSITIVE IDEAL POINT (PIP); TECHNIQUE FOR ORDER PREFERENCE BY SIMILARITY TO IDEAL SOLUTION (TOPSIS);

COMPUTATION THEORY;

EID: 33845888809     PISSN: 00963003     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2006.06.030     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Wang Y., and Luo Y. DEA efficiency assessment using ideal and anti-ideal decision making units. Applied Mathematics and Computation 173 2 (2006) 902-915
2. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., and Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2 (1978) 429-444
3. Banker R.D., Charnes A., and Cooper W.W. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 30 9 (1984) 1078-1092
4. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Golany B., Seiford L., and Stutz J. Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions. Journal of Econometrics 30 (1985) 91-107
5. Cooper W.W., Park K.S., and Yu G. IDEA and AR-IDEA: models for dealing with imprecise data in DEA. Management Science 45 (1999) 597-607
6. Thompson R.G., Singleton R.D., Thrall R.M., and Smith B.A. Comparative site evaluations for locating a high energy physics laboratory in Texas. Interfaces 16 (1986) 35-49
7. Andersen P., and Petersen N.C. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 39 (1993) 1261-1264
8. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Wei Q.L., and Huang Z.M. Cone ratio data envelopment analysis and multi-objective programming. International Journal of Systems Science 20 (1989) 1099-1118
9. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Sun B., and Huang Z. Polyhedral cone-ratio models with an application to large commercial banks. Journal of Econometrics 46 (1990) 73-91
10. Land K.C., Lovell C.A.K., and Thore S. Productivity and efficiency under capitalism and state socialism: an empirical inquiry using chance-constrained data envelopment analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 46 (1994) 139-152
11. Olesen O.B., and Petersen N.C. Chance constrained efficiency evaluation. Management Science 41 (1995) 442-457
12. Cooper W.W., Huang Z.M., and Li S.X. Satisficing DEA models under chance constraints. The Annals of Operations Research 66 (1996) 279-295
13. Cooper W.W., Huang Z.M., Lelas V., Li S.X., and Olesen O.B. Chance constrained programming formulations for stochastic characterizations of efficiency and dominance in DEA. Journal of Productivity Analysis 9 (1998) 53-79
14. Cooper W.W., Deng H., Huang Z.M., and Li S.X. Chance constrained programming approaches to technical efficiencies and inefficiencies in stochastic data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society 53 (2002) 1347-1356
15. Sexton T.R., Silkman R.H., and Hogan A.J. Data envelopment analysis: critique and extensions. In: Silkman R.H. (Ed). Measuring Efficiency: An Assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis (1986), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA 73-105
16. Doyle J.R., and Green R. Efficiency and cross-efficiency in data envelopment analysis: derivatives, meanings and uses. Journal of the Operational Research Society 45 5 (1994) 567-578
17. D. Wu, Z. Yang, L. Liang, Efficiency analysis of cross-region bank branches using fuzzy data envelopment analysis. Applied Mathematics and Computation, in press, doi:10.1016/j.amc.2006.01.037.
18. Sinuany-Stern Z., and Friedman L. DEA and the discriminant analysis of ratios for ranking units. European Journal of Operational Research 111 (1998) 470-478
19. Friedman L., and Sinuany-Stern Z. Scaling units via the canonical correlation analysis and the DEA. European Journal of Operational Research 100 3 (1997) 629-637
20. Golany B. An interactive MOLP procedure for the extension of data envelopment analysis to effectiveness analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society 39 8 (1988) 725-734
21. Troutt M.D. A maximum decisional efficiency estimation principle. Management Science 41 (1995) 76-82
22. Cook W.D., Kress M., and Seiford L.M. Data envelopment analysis in the presence of both quantitative and qualitative factors. Journal of the Operational Research Society 47 (1996) 945-953
23. Sinuany-Stern Z., Mehrez A., and Hadad Y. An AHP/DEA methodology for ranking decision making units. International Transactions in Operational Research 7 (2000) 109-124
24. Paradi J.C., Asmild M., and Simak P.C. Using DEA and worst practice DEA in credit risk evaluation. Journal of productivity Analysis 21 2 (2004) 153-166
25. Hwang C.L., and Yoon K. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications (1981), Springer-Verlag, New York
26. Deng H., Yeh C., and Willis R.J. Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights. Computers & Operations Research 27 10 (2000) 963-973
27. Olson D.L. Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 40 (2004) 721-727
28. Charnes A., and Cooper W. Programming with linear fractional functions. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 9 (1962) 181-185
29. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., and Rhodes E. Short communication: measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research 3 (1979) 339
30. Adler N., Friedman L., and Sinuany-Stern Z. Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context. European Journal of Operational Research 140 2 (2002) 249-265