Descriptive modeling of longitudinal outcome measures in traumatic brain injury: A national institute on disability and rehabilitation research traumatic brain injury model systems study

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 94, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 579-588

  Pretz, Christopher R ^a,b   Kozlowski, Allan J ^c,d   Dams O'Connor, Kristen ^e   Kreider, Scott ^a,b   Cuthbert, Jeffery P ^a,b   Corrigan, John D ^f   Heinemann, Allen W ^c,d   Whiteneck, Gale ^a,b  

^a CRAIG HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b Traumatic Brain Injury National Statistical and Data Center   (United States)

^c REHABILITATION INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^d NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY WEXNER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Longitudinal studies; Regression analysis; Rehabilitation; Rehabilitation outcome; Traumatic brain injury

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; DESCRIPTIVE RESEARCH; DISABILITY; GROWTH CURVE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; METHODOLOGY; MODEL; MULTICENTER STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; REHABILITATION RESEARCH; SCIENTIST; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY;

EID: 84875372870     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: 1532821X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.08.197     Document Type: Note

References (22)

1. M.P. Dijkers, C. Harrison-Felix, and J.H. Marwitz The Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems: history and contributions to clinical service and research J Head Trauma Rehabil 25 2010 81 91
2. S. Warschausky, J.B. Kay, and D.G. Kewman Hierarchical linear modeling of FIM instrument growth curve characteristics after spinal cord injury Arch Phys Med Rehabil 82 2001 329 334
3. A.J. Kozlowski, C.R Pretz, K. Dams-O'Connor, S. Kreider, and G. Whiteneck An introduction to applying individual growth curve models to evaluate change in rehabilitation: a NationaI Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems report Arch Phys Med Rehabil 94 2013 589 596
4. D.L. Jackson Reporting results of latent growth modeling and multi-level modeling analyses: some recommendations for rehabilitation psychology Rehabil Psychol 55 2010 272 285
5. O.M. Kwok, A.T. Underhill, J.W. Berry, W. Luo, T.R. Elliott, and M. Yoon Analyzing longitudinal data with multilevel models: an example with individuals living with lower exremity intra-articular fractures Rehabil Psychol 53 2008 370 386
6. C. DeLucia, and S.C. Pitts Applications of individual growth curve modeling for pediatric psychology research J Pediatr Psychol 31 2006 1002 1023
7. S.W. Raudenbush, and A.S. Bryk Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods 2nd ed. 2001 Sage Publications Thousand Oaks
8. G. Fitzmaurice, M. Laird, and J. Ware Applied longitudinal analysis 2004 John Wiley & Sons Hoboken
9. J. Singer, and J. Willett Applied longitudinal data analysis 2003 Oxford University Pr Oxford
10. Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems National Data and Statistical Center web page. Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems National Data and Statistical Center. Available at: https://www.tbindsc.org/. Accessed October 18, 2012.
11. C.V. Granger, A. Deutsch, C. Russell, T. Black, and K.J. Ottenbacher Modifications of the FIM instrument under the inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system Am J Phys Med Rehabil 86 2007 883 892
12. G. Williams, V. Robertson, K. Greenwood, P. Goldie, and M.E. Morris The concurrent validity and responsiveness of the high-level mobility assessment tool for measuring the mobility limitations of people with traumatic brain injury Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87 2006 437 442
13. H. Houlden, M. Edwards, J. McNeil, and R. Greenwood Use of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure during early inpatient rehabilitation after single incident brain injury Clin Rehabil 20 2006 153 159
14. M. Scheuringer, E. Grill, C. Boldt, and G. Stucki Latent Class Factor Analysis of the Functional Independence Measure confirmed four distinct dimensions in patients undergoing neurological rehabilitation Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 47 2011 25 34
15. Boake C. The Supervision Rating Scale. The Center for Outcome Measurement in Brain Injury. 2000. Available at: http://www.tbims.org/combi/srs. Accessed March 5, 2012.
16. J.T. Wilson, L.E. Pettigrew, and G.M. Teasdale Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use J Neurotrauma 15 1998 573 585
17. D. Shukla, B.I. Devi, and A. Agrawal Outcome measures for traumatic brain injury Clin Neurol Neurosurg 113 2011 435 441
18. E. Diener, R.A. Emmons, R.J. Larsen, and S. Griffin The Satisfaction With Life Scale J Pers Assess 49 1985 71 75
19. W. Pavot, and E. Diener Review of the Satisfaction With Life Scale Psychol Assess 5 1993 164 172
20. TBI Model Systems National Data and Statistical Center. Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems National Database Syllabus. Available at: http://www.tbindsc.org. Accessed May 31, 2012.
21. K.P. Burnham, and D.R. Anderson Multimodal inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection Sociol Methods Res 33 2004 261 304
22. The SAS Institute. The MIXED procedure. Available at: http://support.sas.com/documentation. Accessed May 3, 2012.