The concurrent validity and responsiveness of the high-level mobility assessment tool for measuring the mobility limitations of people with traumatic brain injury

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 87, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 437-442

  Williams, Gavin ^a,b   Robertson, Val ^c   Greenwood, Ken ^b   Goldie, Patricia ^b   Morris, Meg E ^d,e  

^a EPWORTH HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^e Rehabilitation and Aged Care Program   (Australia)

Author keywords

Brain injuries; Gait disorders, neurologic; Rehabilitation; Reproducibility of results; Running

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; DISABILITY; GAIT DISORDER; HUMAN; IMMOBILIZATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY; VALIDITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN INJURIES; HUMANS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; WALKING;

EID: 33344473387     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.10.028     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. G. Williams, V. Robertson, K. Greenwood, P. Goldie, M. Morris The High-Level Mobility Assessment Tool (HiMAT) for traumatic brain injury. Part 2: Content validity and discriminability Brain Inj 19 2005 833 843
2. F.M. Collen, D.T. Wade, G.F. Robb, C.M. Bradshaw The Rivermead Mobility Index a further development of the Rivermead Motor Assessment Int Disabil Stud 13 1991 50 54
3. G. Williams, V. Robertson, K. Greenwood Measuring high-level mobility after traumatic brain injury Am J Phys Med Rehabil 83 2004 910 920
4. C.V. Granger, B.B. Hamilton, F.S. Sherwin Guide for the use of the uniform data set for medical rehabilitation 1983 Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation Project Office, Buffalo General Hospital Buffalo
5. N. Lincoln, D. Leadbitter Assessment of motor function in stroke patients Physiotherapy 65 1979 48 51
6. C. Granger, B. Hamilton, J. Linacre, A. Heinemann, B. Wright Performance profiles of the Functional Independence Measure Am J Phys Med Rehabil 72 1993 84 89
7. K.A. Brock, P.A. Goldie, K.M. Greenwood Evaluating the effectiveness of stroke rehabilitation choosing a discriminative measure Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83 2002 92 99
8. J.M. Linacre, A.W. Heinemann, B.D. Wright, C.V. Granger, B.B. Hamilton The structure and stability of the Functional Independence Measure Arch Phys Med Rehabil 75 1994 127 132
9. A.W. Heinemann, J.M. Linacre, B.D. Wright, B.B. Hamilton, C. Granger Relationships between impairment and physical disability as measured by the Functional Independence Measure Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74 1993 566 573
10. M.G. Stineman, J.A. Shea, A. Jette The Functional Independence Measure tests of scaling assumptions, structure, and reliability across 20 diverse impairment categories Arch Phys Med Rehabil 77 1996 1101 1108
11. D.E. Beaton, C. Bombardier, J.N. Katz, J.G. Wright A taxonomy for responsiveness J Clin Epidemiol 54 2001 1204 1217
12. P.A. Goldie, T.A. Matyas, O.M. Evans Deficit and change in gait velocity during rehabilitation after stroke Arch Phys Med Rehabil 77 1996 1074 1082
13. M. Davidson, J.L. Keating A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires reliability and responsiveness Phys Ther 82 2002 8 24
14. M.H. Liang, A.H. Fossel, M.G. Larsen Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopaedic evaluation Med Care 28 1990 632 642
15. G. Guyatt, S. Walter, G. Norman Measuring change over time assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments J Chronic Dis 40 1987 171 178
16. L. Guttman A basis for scaling qualitative data Am Sociol Rev 9 1944 139 150
17. S.A. Adams, A. Ashburn, R.M. Pickering, D. Taylor The scalability of the Rivermead Motor Assessment in acute stroke patients Clin Rehabil 11 1997 42 51
18. S.A. Adams, R.M. Pickering, A. Ashburn, N.B. Lincoln The scalability of the Rivermead Motor Assessment in nonacute stroke patients Clin Rehabil 11 1997 52 59
19. S. Tepper, P. Beatty, G. DeJong Outcomes in traumatic brain injury self-report versus report of significant others Brain Inj 10 1996 575 581
20. C.P. Cusick, K.A. Gerhart, D.C. Mellick Participant-proxy reliability in traumatic brain injury outcome research J Head Trauma Rehabil 15 2000 739 749
21. Williams G, Greenwood K, Robertson V, Goldie P, Morris M. High-Level Mobility Assessment Tool (HiMAT): inter-rater reliability, retest reliability and internal consistency. Phys Ther. In press.
22. L.E. Kazis, J.J. Anderson, R.F. Meenan Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status Med Care 27 3 Suppl 1989 S178 S189
23. J. Cohen Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences 1977 Academic Pr New York
24. L.G. Portney, M.P. Watkins Foundations of clinical research application to practice 1993 Appleton & Lange Norwalk
25. H. Dillon, M. So Incentives and obstacles to the routine use of outcomes measures by clinicians Ear Hear 21 4 Suppl 2000 2S 6S
26. K. Fisher, R.J. Hardie Goal attainment scaling in evaluating a multidisciplinary pain management programme Clin Rehabil 16 2002 871 877
27. B.M. Joyce, K.J. Rockwood, C.C. Mate-Kole Use of goal attainment scaling in brain injury in a rehabilitation hospital Am J Phys Med Rehabil 73 1994 10 14
28. M. Ponte-Allan, G.M. Giles Goal setting and functional outcomes in rehabilitation Am J Occup Ther 53 1999 646 649