Responsiveness and validity of three dexterous function measures in stroke rehabilitation

Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development

Volumn 47, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 563-572

  Lin, Keh Chung ^a,b   Chuang, Li Ling ^a   Wu, Ching Yi ^c   Hsieh, Yu Wei ^a   Chang, Wan Ying ^d  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^c CHANG GUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^d TAIPEI HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Bootstrapping; Cerebrovascular accident; Clinimet rics; Dexterity; Function; Outcome; Rehabilitation; Responsiveness; Upper limb; Validity

Indexed keywords

BOOTSTRAPPING; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINIMET-RICS; DEXTERITY; OUTCOME; REHABILITATION; RESPONSIVENESS; UPPER LIMBS; VALIDITY;

ACCIDENTS;

PATIENT REHABILITATION;

ACTION RESEARCH ARM TEST; ADULT; ARTICLE; BOX AND BLOCK TEST; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONCURRENT VALIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; FUGL-MEYER ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HAND DISEASE; HAND FUNCTION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY LOG; NINE-HOLE PEG TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STROKE IMPACT SCALE; STROKE PATIENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; COHORT STUDIES; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 77957085652     PISSN: 07487711     EISSN: 07487711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2009.09.0155     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Van der Grond J, Prevo AJ. Proba-bility of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: Impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke. 2003;34(9):2181-86. DOI:10.1161/01.STR.0000087172.16305.CD
2. Kwakkel G, Kollen B. Predicting improvement in the upper paretic limb after stroke: A longitudinal prospective study. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2007;25(5-6):453-60.
3. Tuke A. Constraint-induced movement therapy: A narra-tive review. Physiotherapy. 2008;94(2):105-14. DOI:10.1016/j.physio.2007.07.007
4. Stewart KC, Cauraugh JH, Summers JJ. Bilateral move-ment training and stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Sci. 2006;244(1-2):89-95. DOI:10.1016/j.jns.2006.01.005
5. Salter KL, Teasell RW, Foley NC, Jutai JW. Outcome assessment in randomized controlled trials of stroke reha-bilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;86(12):1007-12. DOI:10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181587b3d
6. Hsieh YW, Wu CY, Lin KC, Chang YF, Chen CL, Liu JS. Responsiveness and validity of three outcome measures of motor function after stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 2009; 40(4):1386-91. DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.530584
7. Platz T, Pinkowski C, Van Wijck F, Kim IH, Di Bella P, Johnson G. Reliability and validity of arm function assess-ment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: A mul-ticentre study. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19(4):404-11. DOI:10.1191/0269215505cr832oa
8. Rabadi MH, Rabadi FM. Comparison of the action research arm test and the Fugl-Meyer assessment as mea-sures of upper-extremity motor weakness after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(7):962-66. DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2006.02.036
9. Lin KC, Hsieh YW, Wu CY, Chen CL, Jang Y, Liu JS. Min-imal detectable change and clinically important difference of the Wolf Motor Function Test in stroke patients. Neurore-habil Neural Repair. 2009;23(5):429-34. DOI:10.1177/1545968308331144
10. Bogard K, Wolf S, Zhang Q, Thompson P, Morris D, Nichols-Larsen D. Can the Wolf Motor Function Test be streamlined? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23(5):422-28. DOI:10.1177/1545968308331141
11. Dromerick AW, Lang CE, Birkenmeier R, Hahn MG, Sahr-mann SA, Edwards DF. Relationships between upper-limb functional limitation and self-reported disability 3 months after stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2006;43(3):401-8. DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2005.04.0075
12. Chen HM, Chen CC, Hsueh IP, Huang SL, Hsieh CL. Test-retest reproducibility and smallest real difference of 5 hand function tests in patients with stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;25(5):435-40. DOI:10.1177/1545968308331146
13. Higgins J, Mayo NE, Desrosiers J, Salbach NM, Ahmed S. Upper-limb function and recovery in the acute phase post-stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005;42(1):65-76. DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2003.10.0156
14. Higgins J, Salbach NM, Wood-Dauphinee S, Richards CL, Côté R, Mayo NE. The effect of a task-oriented interven-tion on arm function in people with stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20(4):296-310. DOI:10.1191/0269215505cr943oa
15. Croarkin E, Danoff J, Barnes C. Evidence-based rating of upper-extremity motor function tests used for people fol-lowing a stroke. Phys Ther. 2004;84(1):62-74.
16. Beebe JA, Lang CE. Relationships and responsiveness of six upper extremity function tests during the first six months of recovery after stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2009; 33(2):96-103.
17. Lang CE, Beebe JA. Relating movement control at 9 upper extremity segments to loss of hand function in people with chronic hemiparesis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007; 21(3):279-91. DOI:10.1177/1545968306296964
18. Lang CE, Wagner JM, Dromerick AW, Edwards DF. Mea-surement of upper-extremity function early after stroke: Properties of the action research arm test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(12):1605-10. DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2006.09.003
19. Duncan P, Reker D, Kwon S, Lai SM, Studenski S, Perera S, Alfrey C, Marquez J. Measuring stroke impact with thestroke impact scale: Telephone versus mail administration in veterans with stroke. Med Care. 2005;43(5):507-15. DOI:10.1097/01.mlr.0000160421.42858.de
20. Lin KC, Fu T, Wu CY, Wang YH, Liu JS, Hsieh CJ, Lin SF. Minimal detectable change and clinically important differ-ence of the stroke impact scale in stroke patients. Neurore-habil Neural Repair. 2010;24(5):486-93. DOI:10.1177/1545968309356295
21. Van der Lee JH, Beckerman H, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM. The responsiveness of the Action Research Arm test and the Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale in chronic stroke patients. J Rehabil Med. 2001;33(3):110-13. DOI:10.1080/165019701750165916
22. McEwen S, Mayo N, Wood-Dauphinee S. Inferring quality of life from performance-based assessments. Disabil Reha-bil. 2000;22(10):456-63. DOI:10.1080/09638280050045938
23. Desrosiers J, Bravo G, Hébert R, Dutil E, Mercier L. Vali-dation of the Box and Block Test as a measure of dexterity of elderly people: Reliability, validity, and norms studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75(7):751-55.
24. Heller A, Wade DT, Wood VA, Sunderland A, Hewer RL, Ward E. Arm function after stroke: Measurement and recovery over the first three months. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1987;50(6):714-19. DOI:10.1136/jnnp.50.6.714
25. Jacob-Lloyd HA, Dunn OM, Brain ND, Lamb SE. Effec-tive measurement of the functional progress of stroke cli-ents. Br J Occup Ther. 2005;68(6):253-59.
26. Sunderland A, Tinson D, Bradley L, Hewer RL. Arm func-tion after stroke. An evaluation of grip strength as a mea-sure of recovery and a prognostic indicator. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1989;52(11):1267-72. DOI:10.1136/jnnp.52.11.1267
27. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Twisk JW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC. Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: A randomised trial. Lancet. 1999; 354(9174):191-96. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(98)09477-X
28. Mathiowetz V, Volland G, Kashman N, Weber K. Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther. 1985;39(6):386-91.
29. Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Kashman N, Volland G. Adult norms for the Nine-Hole Peg test of finger dexterity. Occup Ther J Res. 1985;5(1):24-38.
30. Lyle RC. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res. 1981;4(4):483-92. DOI:10.1097/00004356-198112000-00001
31. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jääskö L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evalua-tion of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975; 7(1):13-31.
32. Van der Lee JH, Beckerman H, Knol DL, De Vet HC, Bouter LM. Clinimetric properties of the motor activity log for the assessment of arm use in hemiparetic patients. Stroke. 2004;35(6):1410-14. DOI:10.1161/01.STR.0000126900.24964.7e
33. Duncan PW, Bode RK, Min Lai S, Perera S. Glycine Antagonist in Neuroprotection Americans Investigators. Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: The Stroke Impact Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 84(7):950-63. DOI:10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00035-2
34. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sci-ences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale (NJ): L. Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
35. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. An introduction to the bootstrap. New York (NY): Chapman & Hall; 1993.
36. Stratford PW, Kennedy DM. Does parallel item content on WOMAC's pain and function subscales limit its ability to detect change in functional status? BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2004;5:17. DOI:10.1186/1471-2474-5-17
37. Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Pearson/Prentice Hall; 2009.
38. Guyatt GH, Deyo RA, Charlson M, Levine MN, Mitchell A. Responsiveness and validity in health status measure-ment: A clarification. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42(5):403-8. DOI:10.1016/0895-4356(89)90128-5
39. Falconer J, Hughes SL, Naughton BJ, Singer R, Chang RW, Sinacore JM. Self report and performance-based hand function tests as correlates of dependency in the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39(7):695-99.
40. Ostwald SK, Snowdon DA, Rysavy DM, Keenan NL, Kane RL. Manual dexterity as a correlate of dependency in the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1989;37(10):963-69.