A preactivation account of sensory attenuation

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 51, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 922-929

  Roussel, Cedric ^a,b   Hughes, Gethin ^a,b   Waszak, Florian ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

Contrast perception; Ideomotor; Preactivation; Prediction; Sensory attenuation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION; RATING SCALE; SENSORY STIMULATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ASSOCIATION; BRAIN; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84875358516     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: 18733514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.02.005     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Albrecht D.G., Farrar S.B., Hamilton D.B. Spatial contrast adaptation characteristics of neurones recorded in the cat's visual cortex. Journal of Physiology 1984, 347:713-739.
2. Bass P., Jacobsen T., Schroger E. Suppression of the auditory N1 event-related potential component with unpredictable self-initiated tones: Evidence for internal forward models with dynamic stimulation. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2008, 70(2):137-143.
3. Bays P.M., Flanagan J.R., Wolpert D.M. Attenuation of self-generated tactile sensations is predictive, not postdictive. Plos Biology 2006, 4(2):281-284.
4. Bays P.M., Wolpert D.M. Computational principles of sensorimotor control that minimize uncertainty and variability. Journal of Physiology 2007, 578(2):387-396.
5. Bays P.M., Wolpert D.M. Predictive attenuation in the perception of touch. Sensorimotor foundations of higher cognition, attention and performance 2007, 339-358. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England. P. Haggard, Y. Rossetti, M. Kawato (Eds.).
6. Blakemore S.J., Wolpert D.M., Frith C.D. Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation. Nature Neuroscience 1998, 1(7):635-640.
7. Brainard D.H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision 1997, 10:433-436.
8. Burr D.C., Morrone M.C., Ross J. Selective suppression of the magnocellular visual pathway during saccadic eye movements. Nature 1994, 371(6497):511-513.
9. Cardoso-Leite P., Mamassian P., Schutz-Bosbach S., Waszak F. A new look at sensory attenuation. Action-effect anticipation affects sensitivity, not response bias. Psychological Science 2010, 21(12):1740-1745.
10. Craver-Lemley C., Reeves A. How visual imagery interferes with vision. Psychological Review 1992, 99(4):633-649.
11. Dean A.F. Adaptation-induced alteration of the relation between response amplitude and contrast in cat striate cortical neurones. Vision Research 1983, 23(3):249-256.
12. Dehaene S. The neural basis of the Weber-Fechner law: A logarithmic mental number line. Trends Cognitive Sciences 2003, 7:145-147.
13. Epstein R., Kanwisher N. A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature 1998, 392(6676):598-601.
14. Galvin S.J., Podd J.V., Drga V., Whitmore J. Type 2 tasks in the theory of signal detectability: Discrimination between correct and incorrect decisions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2003, 10(4):843-876.
15. Gorea A., Sagi D. Disentangling signal from noise in visual contrast discrimination. Nature Neuroscience 2001, 4:1146-1150.
16. Green D.M., Swets J.A. Signal detection theory and psychophysics 1966, Wiley, New York.
17. Greenwald A.G. Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: With special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. Psychological Review 1970, 77(2):73-99.
18. Grill-Spector K., Henson R., Martin A. Repetition and the brain: Neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2006, 10:14-23.
19. Harless G.C.A.V. Die Ehescheidungsfrage; eine erneute Untersuchung der neutestamentlichen Schriftstellen 1861, S.G. Liesching, Stuttgart.
20. Heeger D.J. Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex. Vision Neuroscience 1992, 9(2):181-197.
21. Henson R.N. Neuroimaging studies of priming. Progress in Neurobiology 2003, 70:53-81.
22. Hommel B., Musseler J., Aschersleben G., Prinz W. The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2001, 24(5):849.
23. Hughes, G., Desantis, A., & Waszak, F. (2013). Mechanisms of intentional binding and sensory attenuation: The role of temporal prediction, temporal control, identity prediction, and motor prediction. Psychological Bulletin, 139(1), 133-151.
24. Hughes G., Waszak F. ERP correlates of action effect prediction and visual sensory attenuation in voluntary action. Neuroimage 2011, 56(3):1632-1640.
25. Principles of psychology 1890, Vol. 2. Holt, New York.
26. Kanwisher N., McDermott J., Chun M.M. The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal Neuroscience 1997, 17(11):4302-4311.
27. Kesten H. Accelerated stochastic approximation. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1958, 29(1):41-59.
28. Kleiner M., Brainard D.,& Pelli D., 2007, "What's new in Psychtoolbox-3?" Perception 36 ECVP Abstract Supplement.
29. Kuhn S., Seurinck R., Fias W., Waszak F. The internal anticipation of sensory action effects: when action induces FFA and PPA activity. Frontiere in Human Neuroscience 2010, 4:54.
30. Kunimoto C., Miller J., Pashler H. Confidence and accuracy of near-threshold discrimination responses. Consciousness and Cognition 2001, 10(3):294-340.
31. Lotze, R. H. (1852 ). Medicinische Psychologie oder Physiologie der Seele.
32. Macmillan, N.A., & Creelman, C.D. (Ed.). (1991). Detection theory: A user's guide.
33. McCulloch W.P.W. A logical calculus of ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 1943, 5:115-133.
34. Nagarajan S.S., Aliu S.O., Houde J.F. Motor-induced suppression of the auditory cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2009, 21(4):791-802.
35. Ohzawa I., Sclar G., Freeman R.D. Contrast gain control in the cat's visual system. Journal of Neurophysiology 1985, 54(3):651-667.
36. Pelli D.G. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision 1997, 10:437-442.
37. Perky C.W. An experimental study of imagination. The American Journal of Psychology 1910, 21(3):422-452.
38. Prinz W. A common coding approach to perception and action. Relationships between perception and action 1990, 167-201. Springer, New York, NY. O. Neumann, W. Prinz (Eds.).
39. Prinz W. Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 1997, 9:129-154.
40. Reynolds J.H., Pasternak T., Desimone R. Attention increases sensitivity of V4 neurons. Neuron 2000, 26(3):703-714.
41. Saul A.B., Cynader M.S. Adaptation in single units in visual cortex: The tuning of aftereffects in the spatial domain. Vision Neuroscience 1989, 2(6):593-607.
42. Schafer E.W.P., Marcus M.M. Self-stimulation alters human sensory brain responses. Science 1973, 181(4095):175-177.
43. Sclar G., Ohzawa I., Freeman R.D. Contrast gain control in the Kitten's visual system. Journal of Neurophysiology 1985, 54(3):668-675.
44. Sergent C., Dehaene S. Is consciousness a gradual phenomenon? Evidence for an all-or-none bifurcation during the attentional blink. Psychological Science 2004, 15(11):720-728.
45. Waszak F., Cardoso-Leite P., Hughes G. Action effect anticipation: Neurophysiological basis and functional consequences. Neuroscience Biobehavioral Review 2012, 36(2):943-959.
46. Wiggs C.L., Martin A. Properties and mechanisms of perceptual priming. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 1998, 8:227-233.
47. Wolpert D.M., Ghahramani Z., Jordan M.I. An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 1995, 269(5232):1880-1882.