ERP correlates of action effect prediction and visual sensory attenuation in voluntary action

NeuroImage

Volumn 56, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 1632-1640

  Hughes, Gethin ^a   Waszak, Florian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

Event related potentials; Ideomotor; Motor prediction; Sensory attenuation; Voluntary action

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EYE FIXATION; FEMALE; FRONTAL CORTEX; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PARIETAL CORTEX; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT; VOLUNTEER;

ADULT; ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MOTOR CORTEX; MOVEMENT; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SENSATION; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 79955482391     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.02.057     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Aliu S.O., Houde J.F., Nagarajan S.S. Motor-induced suppression of the auditory cortex. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2009, 21(4):791-802.
2. Baess P., Widmann A., Roye A., Schroger E., Jacobsen T. Attenuated human auditory middle latency response and evoked 40-Hz response to self-initiated sounds. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29(7):1514-1521.
3. Baess P., Jacobsen T., Schroger E. Suppression of the auditory N1 event-related potential component with unpredictable self-initiated tones: evidence for internal forward models with dynamic stimulation. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2008, 70(2):137-143.
4. Band G.P., van Steenbergen H., Ridderinkhof K.R., Falkenstein M., Hommel B. Action-effect negativity: irrelevant action effects are monitored like relevant feedback. Biol. Psychol. 2009.
5. Blakemore S.J., Wolpert D.M., Frith C.D. Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation. Nat. Neurosci. 1998, 1(7):635-640.
6. Blakemore S.J., Wolpert D., Frith C. Why can't you tickle yourself?. NeuroReport 2000, 11(11):R11-R16.
7. Cardoso-Leite P., Mamassian P., Schütz-Bosbach S., Waszak F. A new look at sensory attenuation: action-effect anticipation affects sensitivity, not response bias. Psychol. Sci. 2010, 21(12):1740-1745.
8. Carter C.S., Braver T.S., Barch D.M., Botvinick M.M., Noll D., Cohen J.D. Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science 1998, 280(5364):747-749.
9. Coles M.G. Modern mind-brain reading: psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. Psychophysiology 1989, 26(3):251-269.
10. Coles M.G.H., Smid H.G.O.M., Scheffers M.K., Otten L.J. Mental chronometry and the study of human information processing. Electrophysiology of mind: Event-related brain potentials and cognition 1995, 86-131. Oxford University Press, London. M.G.H. Coles, M.D. Rugg (Eds.).
11. Correa A., Lupianez J., Madrid E., Tudela P. Temporal attention enhances early visual processing: a review and new evidence from event-related potentials. Brain Res. 2006, 1076(1):116-128.
12. Debener S., Ullsperger M., Siegel M., Fiehler K., von Cramon D.Y., Engel A.K. Trial-by-trial coupling of concurrent electroencephalogram and functional magnetic resonance imaging identifies the dynamics of performance monitoring. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25(50):11730-11737.
13. Del Cul A., Baillet S., Dehaene S. Brain dynamics underlying the nonlinear threshold for access to consciousness. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5(10):e260.
14. Delorme A., Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J. Neurosci. Meth. 2004, 134(1):9-21.
15. Folstein J.R., Van Petten C. Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review. Psychophysiology 2008, 45(1):152-170.
16. Foxe J.J., McCourt M.E., Javitt D.C. Right hemisphere control of visuospatial attention: line-bisection judgments evaluated with high-density electrical mapping and source analysis. Neuroimage 2003, 19(3):710-726.
17. Fried I., Katz A., McCarthy G., Sass K.J., Williamson P., Spencer S.S., Spencer D.D. Functional organization of human supplementary motor cortex studied by electrical stimulation. J. Neurosci. 1991, 11(11):3656-3666.
18. Ginsburg N., Karpiuk P. Random generation: analysis of responses. Percept. Mot. Skills 1994, 34:357-358.
19. Green D.M., von Gierke S.M. Visual and auditory choice reaction times. Acta Psychol. (Amst.) 1984, 55(3):231-247.
20. Hazemann P., Audin G., Lille F. Effect of voluntary self-paced movements upon auditory and somatosensory evoked potentials in man. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1975, 39(3):247-254.
21. Haggard P., Clark S., Kalogeras J. Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nat. Neurosci. 2002, 5(4):382-385.
22. Haggard P., Eimer M. On the relation between brain potentials and the awareness of voluntary movements. Exp. Brain Res. 1999, 126(1):128-133.
23. Haggard P., Magno E. Localising awareness of action with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Exp. Brain Res. 1999, 127(1):102-107.
24. Haggard P., Whitford B. Supplementary motor area provides an efferent signal for sensory suppression. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 2004, 19(1):52-58.
25. Haynes J.D., Rees G. Predicting the stream of consciousness from activity in human visual cortex. Curr. Biol. 2005, 15(14):1301-1307.
26. Herwig A., Prinz W., Waszak F. Two modes of sensorimotor integration in intention-based and stimulus-based actions. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. (Colchester) 2007, 60(11):1540-1554.
27. Holroyd C.B., Coles M.G. The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychol. Rev. 2002, 109(4):679-709.
28. Hommel B., Musseler J., Aschersleben G., Prinz W. The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behav. Brain Sci. 2001, 24(5):849-878. discussion 878-937.
29. Jasper The ten twenty electrode system of the International Federation. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1958, 10:371-375.
30. Kutas M., Donchin E. Preparation to respond as manifested by movement-related brain potentials. Brain Res. 1980, 24(1):95-115.
31. Leuthold H., Jentzsch I. Distinguishing neural sources of movement preparation and execution. An electrophysiological analysis. Biol. Psychol. 2002, 60(2-3):173-198.
32. Miall R.C., Wolpert D.M. Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Netw. 1996, 9(8):1265-1279.
33. Miniussi C., Wilding E.L., Coull J.T., Nobre A.C. Orienting attention in time. Modulation of brain potentials. Brain 1999, 122(Pt 8):1507-1518.
34. Pleger B., Ruff C.C., Blankenburg F., Kloppel S., Driver J., Dolan R.J. Influence of dopaminergically mediated reward on somatosensory decision-making. PLoS Biol. 2009, 7(7):e1000164.
35. Polich J., Criado J.R. Neuropsychology and neuropharmacology of P3a and P3b. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2006, 60(2):172-185.
36. Praamstra P., Stegeman D.F., Horstink M.W., Cools A.R. Dipole source analysis suggests selective modulation of the supplementary motor area contribution to the readiness potential. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1996, 98(6):468-477.
37. Roeber U., Wildmann A., Hermann C., O'Shea R.P., Schroger E. Early correlates of visual awareness in the human brain: time and place from event-related brain potentials. J. Vis. 2008, 8(3):1-12.
38. Schäfer E.W., Marcus M.M. Self-stimulation alters human sensory brain responses. Science 1973, 181(95):175-177.
39. Schweinberger S.R., Kaufmann J.M., Moratti S., Keil A., Burton A.M. Brain responses to repetitions of human and animal faces, inverted faces, and objects-an MEG study. Brain Res. 2007, 1184:226-233.
40. Sergent C., Baillet S., Dehaene S. Timing of the brain events underlying access to consciousness during the attentional blink. Nat. Neurosci. 2005, 8(10):1391-1400.
41. Sirigu A., Daprati E., Ciancia S., Giraux P., Nighoghossian N., Posada A., Haggard P. Altered awareness of voluntary action after damage to the parietal cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 2004, 7(1):80-84.
42. Stanislaw H., Todorov N. Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behav. Res. Meth. Instrum. Comput. 1999, 31(1):137-149.
43. Von Holst E., Mittelstaedt H. Das Reafferenzprinzip. Naturwissenschaften 1950, 37:464-476.
44. Waszak F., Herwig A. Effect anticipation modulates deviance processing in the brain. Brain Res. 2007, 1183:74-82.