Ecologically appropriate plant materials for restoration applications

BioScience

Volumn 63, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 211-219

  Jones, Thomas A ^a  

^a USDA ARS Forage and Range Research Laboratory   (United States)

Author keywords

ecological restoration; local adaptation; native plant materials; novel ecosystems; restoration genetics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875349023     PISSN: 00063568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1525/bio.2013.63.3.9     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Bestelmeyer BT, Moseley K, Shaver PL, Sanchez H, Briske DD, Fernandez- Gimenez ME. 2010. Practical guidance for developing state-andtransition models. Rangelands 32: 23-30.
2. Briske DD, Bestelmeyer BT, Stringham TK, Shaver PL. 2008. Recommendations for development of resilience-based state-and-transition models. Rangeland Ecology and Management 61: 359-367.
3. Broadhurst LM, Lowe A, Coates DJ, Cunningham SA, McDonald M, Vesk PA, Yates C. 2008. Seed supply for broadscale restoration: Maximizing evolutionary potential. Evolutionary Applications 1: 587-597.
4. Byers JE, Cuddington K, Jones CG, Talley TS, Hastings A, Lambrinos JG, Crooks JA, Wilson WG. 2006. Using ecosystem engineers to restore ecological systems. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21: 493-500. (Pubitemid 44233954)
5. Carney SE, Gardner KA, Riesberg LH. 2000. Evolutionary changes over the fifty-year history of a hybrid population of sunflowers (Helianthus). Evolution 54: 462-474. (Pubitemid 30263921)
6. Clewell AF. 2000. Restoring for natural authenticity. Ecological Restoration 18: 216-217.
7. Davis MB, Shaw RG. 2001. Range shifts and adaptive responses to Quaternary climate change. Science 292: 673-679. (Pubitemid 32385531)
8. Erickson DL, Fenster CB. 2006. Intraspecific hybridization and the recovery of fitness in the native legume Chamaecrista fasciculata. Evolution 60: 225-233. (Pubitemid 44804549)
9. Funk JL, Cleland EE, Suding KN, Zavaleta ES. 2008. Restoration through reassembly: Plant traits and invasion resistance. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 23: 695-703.
10. Gleason HA. 1926. The individualistic concept of the plant association. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 53: 7-26.
11. - - - . 1939. The individualistic concept of the plant association. American Midland Naturalist 21: 92-110.
12. Gould SJ. 1998. An evolutionary perspective on strengths, fallacies, and confusions in the concept of native plants. Arnoldia 58: 11-19.
13. Hereford J. 2009. A quantitative survey of local adaptation and fitness tradeoffs. American Naturalist 173: 579-588.
14. Herrick JE, Schuman GE, Rango A. 2006. Monitoring ecological processes for restoration projects. Journal for Nature Conservation 14: 161-171. (Pubitemid 44348523)
15. Hobbs RJ, Higgs E, Harris JA. 2009. Novel ecosystems: Implications for conservation and restoration. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24: 599-605.
16. Hobbs RJ, et al. 2010. Guiding concepts for park and wilderness stewardship in an era of global environmental change. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 8: 483-490.
17. Hobbs RJ, Hallett LM, Ehrlich PR, Mooney HA. 2011. Intervention ecology: Applying ecological science in the twenty-first century. BioScience 61: 442-450.
18. Hoffmann AA, Sgrò CM. 2011. Climate change and evolutionary adaptation. Nature 470: 479-485.
19. Jackson ST, Hobbs RJ. 2009. Ecological restoration in the light of ecological history. Science 325: 567-569.
20. Janzen DH. 1985. On ecological fitting. Oikos 45: 308-310.
21. Johnson R, Stritch L, Olwell P, Lambert S, Horning ME, Cronn R. 2010. What are the best seed sources for ecosystem restoration on BLM and USFS lands? Native Plants Journal 11: 117-131.
22. Jones TA. 2003. The Restoration Gene Pool concept: Beyond the native versus non-native debate. Restoration Ecology 11: 281-290. (Pubitemid 37207949)
23. - - - . 2009. Conservation biology and plant breeding: Special considerations for the development of native plant materials for use in restoration. Ecological Restoration 27: 8-11.
24. - - - . 2013. Plant materials for novel ecosystems. Pages 212-227 in Hobbs RJ, Higgs ES, Hall CM, eds. Novel Ecosystems: Intervening in the New Ecological World Order. Wiley-Blackwell.
25. Jones TA, Monaco TA. 2009. A role for assisted evolution in designing native plant materials. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7: 541-547.
26. Jones TA, Robins JG. 2011. Appropriate use of genetic manipulation for the development of restoration plant materials. Progress in Botany 72: 249-264.
27. Jones TA, Monaco TA, James JJ. 2010. Launching the counterattack: Interdisciplinary deployment of native-lant functional traits for repair of rangelands dominated by invasive annual grasses. Rangelands 32: 38-42.
28. Kareiva P, Watts S, McDonald R, Boucher T. 2007. Domesticated nature: Shaping landscapes and ecosystems for human welfare. Science 316: 1866-1869. (Pubitemid 47025778)
29. Kawecki TJ, Ebert D. 2004. Conceptual issues in local adaptation. Ecology Letters 7: 1225-1241. (Pubitemid 39588356)
30. Lankau R, Jørgensen PS, Harris DJ, Sih A. 2011. Incorporating evolutionary principles into environmental management and policy. Evolutionary Applications 4: 312-325.
31. Leimu R, Fischer M. 2008. A meta-analysis of local adaptation in plants. PLOS ONE 3 (art. e4010).
32. Leopold A. 1953. Round River: From the Journals of Aldo Leopold. Oxford University Press.
33. Mack RN. 2003. Phylogenetic constraint, absent life forms, and preadapted alien plants: A prescription for biological invasions. International Journal of Plant Sciences 164: S185-S196.
34. Palmer M, et al. 2004. Ecology for a crowded planet. Science 304: 1251-1252. (Pubitemid 38697405)
35. Potter KM, Hargrove WW. 2012. Determining suitable locations for seed transfer under climate change: A global quantitative method. New Forests 43: 581-599.
36. Rehfeldt GE. 1994. Evolutionary genetics, the biological species, and the ecology of interior cedar-hemlock forests. Pages 91-100 in Baumgartner DM, Lotan JE, Tonn JR, eds. Proceedings of Interior Cedar-Hemlock- White Pine Forests: Ecology and Management. Washington State University Extension.
37. Rice KJ, Emery NC. 2003. Managing microevolution: Restoration in the face of global change. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1: 469-478.
38. Rogers DL, Montalvo AM. 2004. Genetically Appropriate Choices for Plant Materials to Maintain Biological Diversity. US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. (14 December 2012; http://prdp2fs.ess.usda.gov/ Internet/FSE-DOCUMENTS/fsbdev3-039080.pdf)
39. [SERI] Society for Ecological Restoration International. 2004. The SER International Primer on Ecological Restoration. SERI. (14 December 2012; www.ser.org/resources/resources-detail-view/ser-internationalprimer- on-ecological-restoration)
40. Sgrò CM, Lowe AJ, Hofmann AA. 2011. Building evolutionary resilience for conserving biodiversity under climate change. Evolutionary Applications 4: 326-337.
41. Smith SL, Sher AA, Grant TA III. 2007. Genetic diversity in restoration materials and the impacts of seed collection in Colorado's restoration plant production industry. Restoration Ecology 15: 369-374. (Pubitemid 47163291)
42. Stockwell CA, Hendry AP, Kinnison MT. 2003. Contemporary evolution meets conservation biology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 94-101. (Pubitemid 36072684)
43. Weeks AR, et al. 2011. Assessing the benefits and risks of translocations in changing environments: A genetic perspective. Evolutionary Applications 4: 709-725.
44. White PS, Walker JL. 1997. Approximating nature's variation: Selecting and using reference information in restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 5: 338-349. (Pubitemid 127613036)
45. Wilkinson DM. 2004. Do we need a process-based approach to nature conservation? Continuing the parable of Green Mountain, Ascension Island. Journal of Biogeography 31: 2041-2042. (Pubitemid 39623449)