Ultrasound real-time elastography can predict malignancy in BI-RADS®-US 3 lesions

BMC Cancer

Volumn 13, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Wojcinski, Sebastian ^a   Boehme, Esther ^b   Farrokh, André ^b   Soergel, Philipp ^a   Degenhardt, Friedrich ^b   Hillemanns, Peter ^a  

^a HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

^b FRANZISKUS HOSPITAL   (Germany)

Author keywords

BI RADS US 3; Breast cancer; Breast imaging; Breast lesions; Diagnostic accuracy; Sonoelastography

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST DISEASE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; ELASTOGRAPHY; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LOW RISK POPULATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PREDICTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRETEST POSTTEST DESIGN; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RATING SCALE; REAL TIME ULTRASOUND DEVICE; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TSUKUBA ELASTICITY SCORE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; ELASTICITY IMAGING TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MIDDLE AGED; PREVALENCE; PROGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84875317334     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712407     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-159     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2005, 55(2):74-108. 10.3322/canjclin.55.2.74, 15761078.
2. IARC Globocan Database 2008, Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer, IARC.
3. IARC World Cancer Report 2008 2008, Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer, WHO Press, IARC.
4. Parkin DM, Fernandez LM. Use of statistics to assess the global burden of breast cancer. Breast J 2006, 12(Suppl 1):S70-S80.
5. Urbschat I, Kieschke J, Schlanstedt-Jahn U, Gehlen S, Thiel A, Jensch P. Beiträge bevölkerungsbezogener Krebsregister zur Evaluation des bundesweiten Mammographie-Screenings. Gesundheitswesen 2005, 67(7):448-454. 10.1055/s-2005-858515, 16103967.
6. Wojcinski S, Farrokh A, Weber S, Thomas A, Fischer T, Slowinski T, Schmidt W, Degenhardt F. Multicenter study of ultrasound real-time tissue elastography in 779 cases for the assessment of breast lesions: improved diagnostic performance by combining the BI-RADS(R)-US classification system with sonoelastography. Ultraschall in der Medizin 2010, 31(5):484-491. 10.1055/s-0029-1245282, 20408116.
7. Mendelson EB, Baum JK, Berg WA, Merritt CR, Rubin E,. BI-RADS Ultrasound. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: ACR BI-RADS - Breast Imaging Atlas 2002, Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, D'Orsi CJ, Mendelson EB, Ikeda DM, BI-RADS.
8. Hille H, Vetter M, Hackeloer BJ. The accuracy of BI-RADS classification of breast ultrasound as a first-line imaging method. Ultraschall Med 2012, 33(2):160-163. 10.1055/s-0031-1281667, 21877320.
9. Hahn M, Roessner L, Krainick-Strobel U, Gruber IV, Kramer B, Gall C, Siegmann KC, Wallwiener D. Kagan KO: [Sonographic criteria for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions using real-time spatial compound imaging in combination with XRES adaptive image processing]. Ultraschall in der Medizin 2012, 33(3):270-274.
10. Fierbinteanu-Braticevici C, Andronescu D, Usvat R, Cretoiu D, Baicus C, Marinoschi G. Acoustic radiation force imaging sonoelastography for noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis. World J Gastroenterol 2009, 15(44):5525-5532. 10.3748/wjg.15.5525, 2785054, 19938190.
11. Sadigh G, Carlos RC, Neal CH, Dwamena BA. Ultrasonographic differentiation of malignant from benign breast lesions: a meta-analytic comparison of elasticity and BIRADS scoring. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012, 133(1):23-35. 10.1007/s10549-011-1857-8, 22057974.
12. DEGUM (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ultraschall in der Medizin) - Mehrstufenkonzept Mammasonographie http://www.degum.de/Mehrstufenkonzept_Mammasonogra.634.0.html.
13. Ciurea AI, Bolboaca SD, Ciortea CA, Botar-Jid C, Dudea SM. The influence of technical factors on sonoelastographic assessment of solid breast nodules. Ultraschall Med 2011, 32(Suppl 1):S27-S34.
14. KBV (Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung, German Federal Association of Fund Doctors) Ultrasound regulations http://www.kbv.de/rechtsquellen/2488.html, KBV (Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung, German Federal Association of Fund Doctors).
15. Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, Kamma H, Takahashi H, Shiina T, Yamakawa M, Matsumura T. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 2006, 239(2):341-350. 10.1148/radiol.2391041676, 16484352.
16. Ueno E. The utility of real-time tissue elastography for the breast, Hitachi Real-time Tissue Elastography: Publications; International Communications, Clinical Abstracts http://www.bestcontact.com.my/support/downloads/hi-rte-publications-and-communications-clinical-abstracts---applications-in-womens-health-11-06-10.pdf.
17. Barr RG, Lackey AE. The utility of the "bull's-eye" artifact on breast elasticity imaging in reducing breast lesion biopsy rate. Ultrasound Q 2011, 27(3):151-155. 10.1097/RUQ.0b013e31822a9c75, 21873851.
18. Newcombe RG. Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: comparison of eleven methods. Stat Med 1998, 17(8):873-890. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980430)17:8<873::AID-SIM779>3.0.CO;2-I, 9595617.
19. Barr RG, Zhang Z, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB, Berg WA, Yeh N. Probably Benign Lesions on Screening Breast Sonography: Prevalence and Risk of Malignancy in the ACRIN 6666 Trial. Presented at:Radiological Society of North America 2011 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting Chicago, IL, 27 November - 2 December 2011.
20. Madjar H, Ohlinger R, Mundinger A, Watermann D, Frenz JP, Bader W, Schulz-Wendtland R, Degenhardt F. BI-RADS-analogue DEGUM criteria for findings in breast ultrasound-consensus of the DEGUM Committee on Breast Ultrasound. Ultraschall Med 2006, 27(4):374-379. 10.1055/s-2006-926943, 16927216.
21. Thomas A, Fischer T, Frey H, Ohlinger R, Grunwald S, Blohmer JU, Winzer KJ, Weber S, Kristiansen G, Ebert B, Kummel S. Real-time elastography-an advanced method of ultrasound: First results in 108 patients with breast lesions. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006, 28(3):335-340. 10.1002/uog.2823, 16909438.
22. Farrokh A, Wojcinski S, Heymer T, Dumke K, Weber EA, Degenhardt F. Die Real-Time Sonoelastographie in der Mammadiagnostik - Limitationen der Methode. Ultraschall Med 2010, 31:13_01.
23. Wojcinski S, Cassel M, Farrokh A, Soliman AA, Hille U, Schmidt W, Degenhardt F, Hillemanns P. Variations in the Elasticity of Breast Tissue During the Menstrual Cycle Determined by Real-time Sonoelastography. J Ultrasound Med: official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine 2012, 31(1):63-72.
24. Thomas A, Degenhardt F, Farrokh A, Wojcinski S, Slowinski T, Fischer T. Significant differentiation of focal breast lesions: calculation of strain ratio in breast sonoelastography. Acad Radiol 2010, 17(5):558-563. 10.1016/j.acra.2009.12.006, 20171905.
25. Wojcinski S, Farrokh A, Gyapong S, Degenhardt F. Sonoelastographie: Welche Verfahren gibt es? Wie sind Handhabung und Reproduzierbarkeit im klinischen Alltag?. Senologie - Zeitschrift für Mammadiagnostik und -therapie 2009, 6:P042.
26. Moon WK, Choi JW, Cho N, Park SH, Chang JM, Jang M, Kim KG. Computer-aided analysis of ultrasound elasticity images for classification of benign and malignant breast masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010, 195(6):1460-1465. 10.2214/AJR.09.3140, 21098210.