Elected Neighbourhood Officers in a Turkish City (Izmir): Gendered Local Participation in Governance

Urban Studies

Volumn 50, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 977-993

  Şenol, Fatma ^a  

^a IZMIR INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA PROCESSING; DOMINANCE; ELECTORAL SYSTEM; GENDER ROLE; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; NEIGHBORHOOD; PATRIARCHY; POLITICAL PARTICIPATION; POWER RELATIONS; STATE ROLE;

IZMIR [TURKEY]; TURKEY;

EID: 84875312758     PISSN: 00420980     EISSN: 1360063X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0042098012458004     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Alkan A.Gendered structures of local politics in Turkey.Digest of Middle East Studies. 2009;18 (1): 31-56.
2. Appelbaum S. H.,Audet L.,Miller J. C.Gender and leadership? Leadership and gender?.Leadership and Organization Development Journal. 2003;24 (1): 43-51.
3. Arat Y.London: Associated University Presses; 1989:.
4. Ari{dotless}kboǧa E.Yerel yönetim açi{dotless}si{dotless}ndan mahalle muhtarli{dotless}ǧi{dotless}na bir baki{dotless}ş.Çaǧdaş Yerel Yönetimler Dergisi. 1999;8 (3): 103-125.
5. Ari{dotless}kboǧa E.,Erkan N. E.,Güner A. Paper presented at the 1st International Congress on Urban and Environmental Issues and Policies; 2010Trabzon, Turkey; 2010.
6. Beall J.Decentralizing government and decentering gender: lessons from local government reform in South Africa.Politics & Society. 2005;33:253-276.
7. Beall J.Decentralization, women's rights and development. London School of Economics: Institute of Development Studies; 2007:.
8. Certeau M. deThe Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1984:.
9. Çitci O.Yerel Yönetimlerde Temsil: Belediye Örneǧi. Ankara: TODAİE Yayi{dotless}nlari{dotless}; 1989:.
10. Cleaver F.Participation: From Tyranny to Transformation?. Hickey S.Mohan G., ed. London: Zed Books; 2004:271-277.
11. Cornwall A.Participation: From Tyranny to Transformation?. Hickey S.Mohan G., ed. London: Zed Books; 2004:75-91.
12. Eagly A. H.Female leadership advantage and disadvantage.Psychology of Women Quarterly. 2007;31:1-12.
13. Evertzen A.Gender and Local Governance. Amsterdam: Netherlands Development Organization; 2001:.
14. Mobilizing the Community. Fisher R.Kling J., ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1993:.
15. Garcia M.Citizenship practices and urban governance in European cities.Urban Studies. 2006;43 (4): 745-765.
16. Güneş-Ayata A.Women in Modern Turkish Society. Tekeli S., ed. Istanbul: Iletisim Yayinlari; 1991:.
17. Güneş-Ayata A.Democracy, Clientelism, and Civil Society. Roniger L.Güneş-Ayata A., ed. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers; 1994:49-64.
18. Güneş-Ayata A.,Tütüncü F.Critical acts without a critical mass.Parliamentary Affairs. 2008;61 (3): 461-475.
19. Keyman E. F.,İçduygu A.Globalization, civil society and citizenship in Turkey: actors, boundaries and discourses.Citizenship Studies. 2003;7 (2): 219-234.
20. Köker L.Local politics and democracy in Turkey: an appraisal.The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 1995;540:51-62.
21. Lister R.Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1997:.
22. Lovenduski J.Women and politics.Parliamentary Affairs. 2001;54:743-758.
23. Lovenduski J.Cambridge: Polity; 2005:.
24. Marston S. A.The social construction of scale.Progress in Human Geography. 2000;24 (2): 219-242.
25. Ministry of Interior (2011) The Report of 2010. General Directorate of the Local Administration (http://www.migm.gov.tr/Yayinlar.aspx.).
26. Community Activism and Feminist Politics: Organizing across Race, Class, and Gender. Naples N. A., ed. London: Routledge; 1998:.
27. Norris P.,Inglehart R.Cultural Barriers to Women's Leadership. Boston, MA: IPSA; 2000:.
28. Norris P.,Lovenduski J.Gender and Party Politics. Lovenduski J.Norris P., ed. London: Sage Publications; 1993:35-59.
29. Phillips A.The Politics of Presence. New York: Clarendon Press; 1995:.
30. Sancar-Üşür S.Women in state, politics and civil society.Bridging the Gender Gap in Turkey. World Bank Report: Europe and Central Asia Region. 2003;:167-180.
31. Schwindt-Bayer L. A.The incumbency disadvantage and women's election to legislative office.Electoral Studies. 2005;24:227-244.
32. Scott J. W.Gender and the Politics of History. New York: Columbia University Press; 1999:.
33. Senol F.Women running for neighbourhood offices in a Turkish city: motivations and resources for electoral candidacy.Political Geography. 2009;28:362-372.
34. Staeheli L. A.,Clarke S. E.Gender in Urban Research. Garber J. A.Turner R. S., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1995:3-23.
35. Studlar D. T.,McAllister I.Political recruitment to the Australian legislature.Western Political Quarterly. 1991;44 (2): 467-485.
36. Swyngedouw E.Governance innovation and the citizen: the Janus face of governance-beyond-the-state.Urban Studies. 2005;42 (11): 1991-2006.
37. Thomas S.How Women Legislate. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1994:.
38. TUIK (Türkiye Istatistik Kurumu) (2008) Turkish Statistical Institute website (http://www.turkstat.gov.tr; accessed 14 February 2012).
39. Turnhout E.,Bommel S. V.,Aarts N.How participation creates citizens: participatory governance as performative practice.Ecology and Society. 2010;15 (4): 26-40.
40. Urbinati N.,Warren M. E.The concept of representation in contemporary democratic theory.Annual Review of Political Science. 2008;11:387-412.
41. Verba S.,Schlozman K. L.,Brady H. E.Voice and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1995:.
42. Wängnerud L.Women in parliaments: descriptive and substantive representation.Annual Review of Political Science. 2009;12:51-69.
43. Wedel H.Siyaset ve Cinsiyet: Istanbul Gecekondulari{dotless}nda Kadi{dotless}nlari{dotless}n Siyasal Kati{dotless}li{dotless}mi{dotless}. İstanbul: Metis Yayi{dotless}nlari{dotless}; 2001:.