Measuring Outcomes in Hand Surgery

Clinics in Plastic Surgery

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 313-322

  Giladi, Aviram M ^a   Chung, Kevin C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

CAT; COSMIN; Hand surgery outcomes; Health services research; Patient reported measures of hand function; Patient reported outcomes; PROMIS

Indexed keywords

ARTHRITIS IMPACT MEASUREMENT SCALES 2; CARPAL TUNNEL QUESTIONNAIRE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; DISABILITY OF ARM SHOULDER AND HAND; HAND SURGERY; HEALTH ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE; HUMAN; INFORMATION SYSTEM; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; MICHIGAN HAND QUESTIONNAIRE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT RATED WRIST EVALUATION; PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; SHORT FORM 36; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VALIDITY;

DISABILITY EVALUATION; HAND; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84875304382     PISSN: 00941298     EISSN: 15580504     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cps.2012.10.006     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses requiring days away from work, 2010 2011, Bureau of Labor Statistics, USDL-11-1612.
2. de Putter C.E., Selles R.W., Polinder S., et al. Economic impact of hand and wrist injuries: health-care costs and productivity costs in a population-based study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012, 94:e56.
3. Chernew M.E., Rosen A.B., Fendrick A.M. Value-based insurance design. Health Aff (Millwood) 2007, 26:w195-w203.
4. Choudhry N.K., Rosenthal M.B., Milstein A. Assessing the evidence for value-based insurance design. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010, 29:1988-1994.
5. Available at:. http://www.choosingwisely.org.
6. Share D.A., Mason M.H. Michigan's physician group incentive program offers a regional model for incremental 'fee for value' payment reform. Health Aff (Millwood) 2012, 31:1993-2001.
7. Landman J.H. Recommendations for delivering value. Healthc Financ Manage 2012, 66:98. 100.
8. Epstein A.M. The outcomes movement-will it get us where we want to go?. N Engl J Med 1990, 323:266-270.
9. Eisenberg J.M. Putting research to work: reporting and enhancing the impact of health services research. Health Serv Res 2001, 36:x-xvii.
10. Bindra R.R., Dias J.J., Heras-Palau C., et al. Assessing outcome after hand surgery: the current state. J Hand Surg Br 2003, 28:289-294.
11. Crosby C.A., Wehbe M.A., Mawr B. Hand strength: normative values. J Hand Surg Am 1994, 19:665-670.
12. LaStayo P.C., Wheeler D.L. Reliability of passive wrist flexion and extension goniometric measurements: a multicenter study. Phys Ther 1994, 74:162-174. [discussion: 174-66].
13. Berkanovic E., Hurwicz M.L., Lachenbruch P.A. Concordant and discrepant views of patients' physical functioning. Arthritis Care Res 1995, 8:94-101.
14. Hewlett S.A. Patients and clinicians have different perspectives on outcomes in arthritis. J Rheumatol 2003, 30:877-879.
15. Szabo R.M. Outcomes assessment in hand surgery: when are they meaningful?. J Hand Surg Am 2001, 26:993-1002.
16. Alderman A.K., Chung K.C. Measuring outcomes in hand surgery. Clin Plast Surg 2008, 35:239-250.
17. Ware J.E. Standards for validating health measures: definition and content. J Chronic Dis 1987, 40:473-480.
18. Zlowodzki M., Bhandari M. Outcome measures and implications for sample-size calculations. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009, 91(Suppl 3):35-40.
19. Changulani M., Okonkwo U., Keswani T., et al. Outcome evaluation measures for wrist and hand: which one to choose?. Int Orthop 2008, 32:1-6.
20. Davis Sears E., Chung K.C. A guide to interpreting a study of patient-reported outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012, 129:1200-1207.
21. Fitzpatrick R., Davey C., Buxton M.J., et al. Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess 1998, 2:i-iv. 1-74.
22. Chung K.C., Pillsbury M.S., Walters M.R., et al. Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. J Hand Surg Am 1998, 23:575-587.
23. Beaton D.E., Katz J.N., Fossel A.H., et al. Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther 2001, 14:128-146.
24. Kotsis S.V., Chung K.C. Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire in carpal tunnel surgery. J Hand Surg Am 2005, 30:81-86.
25. Ware J.E., Sherbourne C.D. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992, 30:473-483.
26. Linde L., Sorensen J., Ostergaard M., et al. Health-related quality of life: validity, reliability, and responsiveness of SF-36, 15D, EQ-5D [corrected] RAQoL, and HAQ in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2008, 35:1528-1537.
27. Oude Voshaar M.A., ten Klooster P.M., Taal E., et al. Measurement properties of physical function scales validated for use in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review of the literature. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2011, 9:99.
28. Aktekin L.A., Eser F., Baskan B.M., et al. Disability of Arm Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire in rheumatoid arthritis patients: relationship with disease activity, HAQ, SF-36. Rheumatol Int 2011, 31:823-826.
29. MacDermid J.C., Richards R.S., Donner A., et al. Responsiveness of the short form-36, disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire, patient-rated wrist evaluation, and physical impairment measurements in evaluating recovery after a distal radius fracture. J Hand Surg Am 2000, 25:330-340.
30. Kotsis S.V., Lau F.H., Chung K.C. Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and physical measurements in outcome studies of distal radius fracture treatment. J Hand Surg Am 2007, 32:84-90.
31. Chung K.C., Burns P.B., Davis Sears E. Outcomes research in hand surgery: where have we been and where should we go?. J Hand Surg Am 2006, 31:1373-1379.
32. Meenan R.F., Mason J.H., Anderson J.J., et al. AIMS2. The content and properties of a revised and expanded Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales Health Status Questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum 1992, 35:1-10.
33. Hoang-Kim A., Pegreffi F., Moroni A., et al. Measuring wrist and hand function: common scales and checklists. Injury 2011, 42:253-258.
34. Levine D.W., Simmons B.P., Koris M.J., et al. A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993, 75:1585-1592.
35. Beaton D.E., Bombardier C., Guillemin F., et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000, 25:3186-3191.
36. Gonzalez-Calvo J., Gonzalez V.M., Lorig K. Cultural diversity issues in the development of valid and reliable measures of health status. Arthritis Care Res 1997, 10:448-456.
37. Van Ommeren M. Validity issues in transcultural epidemiology. Br J Psychiatry 2003, 182:376-378.
38. Roh Y.H., Yang B.K., Noh J.H., et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Korean version of the Michigan hand questionnaire. J Hand Surg Am 2011, 36:1497-1503.
39. Esposito N. From meaning to meaning: the influence of translation techniques on non-English focus group research. Qual Health Res 2001, 11:568-579.
40. Mokkink L.B., Terwee C.B., Stratford P.W., et al. Evaluation of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of health status measurement instruments. Qual Life Res 2009, 18:313-333.
41. Mokkink L.B., Terwee C.B., Patrick D.L., et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2010, 63:737-745.
42. Jaeschke R., Singer J., Guyatt G.H. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials 1989, 10:407-415.
43. Shauver M.J., Chung K.C. The minimal clinically important difference of the Michigan hand outcomes questionnaire. J Hand Surg Am 2009, 34:509-514.
44. Terwee C.B., Bot S.D., de Boer M.R., et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007, 60:34-42.
45. Mokkink L.B., Terwee C.B., Patrick D.L., et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res 2010, 19:539-549.
46. Angst F. The new COSMIN guidelines confront traditional concepts of responsiveness. BMC Med Res Methodol 2011, 11:152. [author reply: 152].
47. Oftedal S., Bell K.L., Mitchell L.E., et al. A systematic review of the clinimetric properties of habitual physical activity measures in young children with a motor disability. Int J Pediatr 2012, 2012:976425.
48. Dobson F., Choi Y.M., Hall M., et al. Clinimetric properties of observer-assessed impairment tests used to evaluate hip and groin impairments: a systematic review. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2012, 64(10):1565-1575.
49. van de Ven-Stevens L.A., Munneke M., Terwee C.B., et al. Clinimetric properties of instruments to assess activities in patients with hand injury: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009, 90:151-169.
50. Gay R.E., Amadio P.C., Johnson J.C. Comparative responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand, the carpal tunnel questionnaire, and the SF-36 to clinical change after carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Am 2003, 28:250-254.
51. Chatterjee J.S., Price P.E. Comparative responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire after carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Am 2009, 34:273-280.
52. Chung K.C., Haas A. Relationship between patient satisfaction and objective functional outcome after surgical treatment for distal radius fractures. J Hand Ther 2009, 22:302-307. [quiz: 308].
53. Tugwell P., Idzerda L., Wells G.A. Generic quality-of-life assessment in rheumatoid arthritis. Am J Manag Care 2008, 14:234.
54. Russell A.S. Quality-of-life assessment in rheumatoid arthritis. Pharmacoeconomics 2008, 26:831-846.
55. Waljee J.F., Chung K.C., Kim H.M., et al. Validity and responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Questionnaire in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a multicenter, international study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2010, 62:1569-1577.
56. Ware J., Kosinski M., Keller S.D. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996, 34:220-233.
57. Ware J.E. Improvements in short-form measures of health status: introduction to a series. J Clin Epidemiol 2008, 61:1-5.
58. Holland R., Smith R.D., Harvey I., et al. Assessing quality of life in the elderly: a direct comparison of the EQ-5D and AQoL. Health Econ 2004, 13:793-805.
59. Waljee J.F., Kim H.M., Burns P.B., et al. Development of a brief, 12-item version of the Michigan Hand Questionnaire. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011, 128:208-220.
60. Osthus T.B., Preljevic V.T., Sandvik L., et al. Mortality and health-related quality of life in prevalent dialysis patients: comparison between 12- items and 36-items short-form health survey. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2012, 10:46.
61. Gandhi S.K., Salmon J.W., Zhao S.Z., et al. Psychometric evaluation of the 12-item short-form health survey (SF-12) in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. Clin Ther 2001, 23:1080-1098.
62. Guyatt G.H., Feeny D.H., Patrick D.L. Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med 1993, 118:622-629.
63. Mokkink L.B., Knol D.L., van Nispen R.M., et al. Improving the quality and applicability of the Dutch scales of the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired using item response theory. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2010, 53:556-571.
64. Jafari P., Bagheri Z., Ayatollahi S.M., et al. Using Rasch rating scale model to reassess the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales in school children. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2012, 10:27.
65. McHorney C.A., Haley S.M., Ware J.E. Evaluation of the MOS SF-36 Physical Functioning Scale (PF-10): II. Comparison of relative precision using Likert and Rasch scoring methods. J Clin Epidemiol 1997, 50:451-461.
66. Available at:. http://www.nihpromis.org.
67. Hung M., Clegg D.O., Greene T., et al. Evaluation of the PROMIS physical function item bank in orthopaedic patients. J Orthop Res 2011, 29:947-953.
68. DeWitt E.M., Stucky B.D., Thissen D., et al. Construction of the eight-item patient-reported outcomes measurement information system pediatric physical function scales: built using item response theory. J Clin Epidemiol 2011, 64:794-804.
69. Fries J., Rose M., Krishnan E. The PROMIS of better outcome assessment: responsiveness, floor and ceiling effects, and Internet administration. J Rheumatol 2011, 38:1759-1764.