Crossed mixture-process design approach to model nanofiltration rejection for non-dilute multi-ionic solutions in a given range of solution compositions

Desalination

Volumn 315, Issue , 2013, Pages 61-69

  Gozalvez Zafrilla J M ^a   Santafe Moros A ^a   García Díaz, J Carlos ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Crossed mixture design; Experimental design; Ionic solution; Modeling; Nanofiltration

Indexed keywords

APPLICATION EXAMPLES; DESIGN AND OPERATIONS; EXPERIMENTAL PLANS; IONIC SOLUTIONS; MIXTURE DESIGN; MIXTURE-PROCESS DESIGNS; PERMSELECTIVITY PROPERTIES; SOLUTION COMPOSITION;

CHLORINE COMPOUNDS; DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS; IONS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MIXTURES; MODELS; NANOFILTRATION; NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES; PILOT PLANTS; PROCESS DESIGN; SODIUM SULFATE;

POLYNOMIALS;

CALCIUM; CHLORIDE; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FILTRATION; MEMBRANE; MODELING; NITRATE; SODIUM; SOLUTION; SULFATE;

EID: 84875270929     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2012.08.009     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Hilal N., Al Zoubi H., Mohammad A.W., Darwish N.A. Nanofiltration of highly concentrated salt solutions up to seawater salinity. Desalination 2005, 184:315-326.
2. Allègre C., Moulin P., Maisseu M., Charbit F. Treatment and reuse of reactive dyeing effluents. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 269:15-34.
3. Van der Bruggen B., Curcio E., Drioli E. Process intensification in the textile industry: the role of membrane technology. J. Environ. Manage. 2004, 73:267-274.
4. Bargeman G., Timmer M., van der Horst C. Nanofiltration in the food industry. Nanofiltration. Principles and Applications 2005, 305-328. Elsevier, Oxford. A.I. Schäfer, A.G. Fane, T.D. Waite (Eds.).
5. Tanninen J., Mänttäri M., Nyström M. Nanofiltration of concentrated acidic copper sulphate solutions. Desalination 2006, 189:92-96.
6. Ballet G.T., Hafiane A., Dhahbi M. Influence of operating conditions on the retention of phosphate in water by nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 290:164-172.
7. Favre-Réguillon A., Lebuzit G., Murat D., Foos J., Mansour C., Draye M. Selective removal of dissolved uranium in drinking water by nanofiltration. Water Res. 2008, 42:1160-1166.
8. Mohammad A.W., Hilal N., Al Zoubi H., Darwish N.A. Prediction of permeate fluxes and rejections of highly concentrated salts in nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 289:40-50.
9. Straatsma J., Bargeman G., van der Horst H.C., Wesselingh J.A. Can nanofiltration be fully predicted by a model?. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 198:273-284.
10. Kedem O., Freger V. Determination of concentration-dependent transport coefficients in nanofiltration: defining an optimal set of coefficients. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 310:586-593.
11. Bandini S., Vezzani D. Nanofiltration modeling: the role of dielectric exclusion in membrane characterization. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2003, 58:3303-3326.
12. Szymczyk A., Fievet P. Investigating transport properties of nanofiltration membranes by means of a steric, electric and dielectric exclusion model. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 252:77-88.
13. Escoda A., Déon S., Fievet P. Assessment of dielectric contribution in the modeling of multi-ionic transport through nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 378:214-223.
14. Bruni L., Bandini S. The role of the electrolyte on the mechanism of charge formation in polyamide nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 308:136-151.
15. Déon S., Escoda A., Fievet P. A transport model considering charge adsorption inside pores to describe salts rejection by nanofiltration membranes. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2011, 66:2823-2832.
16. Van der Bruggen B., Mänttäri M., Nyström M. Drawbacks of applying nanofiltration and how to avoid them: a review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 63:251-263.
17. Bowen W.R., Jones M.G., Welfoot J.S., Yousef H.N.S. Predicting salt rejections at nanofiltration membranes using artificial neural networks. Desalination 2000, 129:147-162.
18. Darwish N.A., Hilal N., Al Zoubi H., Mohammad A.W. Neural networks simulation of the filtration of sodium chloride and magnesium chloride solutions using nanofiltration membranes. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2007, 85:417-430.
19. Al Abri M., Hilal N. Artificial neural network simulation of combined humic substance coagulation and membrane filtration. Chem. Eng. J. 2008, 141:27-34.
20. Roualdès S., Durand J. Experimental design and modelling in the investigation of PECVD parameters effects on the structural and gas transport properties of plasma polysiloxane membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 230:39-48.
21. Ribeiro A.P.B., de Moura J.M.L.N., Gonçalves L.A.G., Petrus J.C.C., Viotto L.A. Solvent recovery from soybean oil/hexane miscella by polymeric membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 282:328-336.
22. Wee S.L., Tye C.T., Bhatia S. Process optimization studies for the dehydration of alcohol-water system by inorganic membrane based pervaporation separation using design of experiments (DOE). Sep. Purif. Technol. 2010, 71:192-199.
23. Yeong Y.F., Abdullah A.Z., Ahmad A.L., Bhatia S. Process optimization studies of p-xylene separation from binary xylene mixture over silicalite-1 membrane using response surface methodology. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 341:96-108.
24. Wang D.X., Wu L., Liao Z.D., Wang X.L., Tomi Y., Ando M., Shintani T. Modeling the separation performance of nanofiltration membranes for the mixed salts solution with Mg2+ and Ca2+. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 284:384-392.
25. Santafé-Moros A., Gozálvez-Zafrilla J.M., Lora-García J., García-Díaz J.C. Mixture design applied to describe the influence of ionic composition on the removal of nitrate ions using nanofiltration. Desalination 2005, 185:289-296.
26. Dingstad G., Egelandsdal B., Naes T. Modeling methods for crossed mixture experiments-a case study from sausage production. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2003, 66:175-190.
27. Dingstad G.I., Westad F., Naes T. Three case studies illustrating the properties of ordinary and partial least squares regression in different mixture models. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2004, 71:33-45.
28. Didier C., Etcheverrigaray M., Kratje R., Goicoechea H.C. Crossed mixture design and multiple response analysis for developing complex culture media used in recombinant protein production. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2007, 86:1-9.
29. Lee K.M., Gilmore D.F. Formulation and process modeling of biopolymer (polyhydroxyalkanoates: PHAs) production from industrial wastes by novel crossed experimental design. Process. Biochem. 2005, 40:229-246.
30. Borges C.N., Bruns R.E., Almeida A.A., Scarminio I.S. Mixture-mixture design for the fingerprint optimization of chromatographic mobile phases and extraction solutions for Camellia sinensis. Anal. Chim. Acta 2007, 595:28-37.
31. Cornell J.A. Experiments with Mixtures. Designs, Models, and the Analysis of Mixture Data 1990, John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York.
32. Atkinson A.C., Donev A.N. Optimum experimental designs. Oxf. Stat. Sci. Ser. 1992, 8.
33. de Aguiar P.F., Bourguignon B., Khots M.S., Massart D.L., Phan-Than-Luu R. D-optimal designs. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1995, 30:199-210.
34. Kosutic K., Furac L., Sipos L., Kunst B. Removal of arsenic and pesticides from drinking water by nanofiltration membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2005, 42:137-144.
35. de la Rubia Á., Rodríguez M., León V.M., Prats D. Removal of natural organic matter and THM formation potential by ultra- and nanofiltration of surface water. Water Res. 2008, 42:714-722.
36. Freger V., Gilron J., Belfer S. TFC polyamide membranes modified by grafting of hydrophilic polymers: an FT-IR/AFM/TEM study. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 209:283-292.
37. A. Santafé-Moros, Estudio de la influencia del contenido iónico y el pH sobre el comportamiento de la nanofiltración en la potabilización de aguas con exceso de nitratos, Ph. D. Thesis, Universitat Politècnica de Valencia, Spain, 2005.
38. Oatley Darren L., et al. Review of the dielectric properties of nanofiltration membranes and verification of the single oriented layer approximation. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2012, 173:1-11.
39. Lin Yi-Li, Chiang Pen-Chi, Chang E.-E. Removal of small trihalomethane precursors from aqueous solution by nanofiltration. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 146:20-29.
40. Tanninen Jukka, Platt Samatha, Weis Andreas, Nyström Marianne Long-term acid resistance and selectivity of NF membranes in very acidic conditions. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 240:11-18.
41. Mänttäri M., Pekuri T., Nyström M. NF270, a new membrane having promising characteristics and being suitable for treatment of dilute effluents from the paper industry. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 242:107-116.
42. Park Noeon, Kwon Boksoon, Kim Sang-Don, Cho Jaeweon Characterizations of the colloidal and microbial organic matters with respect to membrane foulants. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 275:29-36.
43. Tanninen J., Mänttäri M., Nyström M. Effect of salt mixture concentration on fractionation with NF membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 283:57-64.
44. Chang E.-E., Liang Chung-Huei, Huang Chin-Pao, Chiang Pen-Chi A simplified method for elucidating the effect of size exclusion on nanofiltration membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2012, 85:1-7.
45. Hilal N., Al-Zoubi H., Darwish N.A., Mohammad A.W. Characterisation of nanofiltration membranes using atomic force microscopy. Desalination 2005, 177:187-199.
46. Wang D.X., Su M., Yu Z.Y., Wang X.L., Ando M., Shintani T. Separation performance of a nanofiltration membrane influenced by species and concentration of ions. Desalination 2005, 175:219-225.
47. Nightingale E.R. Phenomenological theory of ion solvation. Effective radii of hydrated ions. J. Phys. Chem. 1959, 63:1381-1387.
48. Paugam L., Taha S., Dorange G., Jaouen P., Quemeneur F. Mechanism of nitrate ions transfer in nanofiltration depending on pressure, pH, concentration and medium composition. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 231:37-46.
49. Choi S., Yun Z.W., Hong S., Ahn K. The effect of co-existing ions and surface characteristics of nanomembranes on the removal of nitrate and fluoride. Desalination 2001, 133:53-64.
50. García F., Ciceron D., Saboni A., Alexandrova S. Nitrate ions elimination from drinking water by nanofiltration: membrane choice. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2006, 52:196-200.
51. Ratanatamskul C., Urase T., Yamamoto K. Description of behavior in rejection of pollutants in ultra low pressure nanofiltration. Water Sci. Technol. 1998, 38:453-462.
52. Paugam L., Diawara C.K., Schlumpf J.P., Jaouen P., Quemeneur F. Transfer of monovalent anions and nitrates especially through nanofiltration membranes in brackish water conditions. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2004, 40:237-242.
53. Thanuttamavong M., Yamamoto K., Oh J.I., Choo K.H., Choi S.J. Rejection characteristics of organic and inorganic pollutants by ultra low-pressure nanofiltration of surface water for drinking water treatment. Desalination 2002, 145:257-264.