Short-term and long-term memory deficits in handedness learning in mice with absent corpus callosum and reduced hippocampal commissure

Behavioural Brain Research

Volumn 245, Issue , 2013, Pages 145-151

  Ribeiro, Andre S ^a   Eales, Brenda A ^b   Biddle, Fred G ^b  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

9XCA WahBid mouse; BTBR T+ tf J mouse; Corpus callosum; Hippocampal commissure; Memory; Paw preference learning

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORPUS CALLOSUM; FEMALE; FOREBRAIN; HANDEDNESS; HIPPOCAMPUS; INTERHEMISPHERIC TRANSFER; LEARNING; LONG TERM MEMORY; MALE; MEMORY DISORDER; MOUSE; NERVE CELL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHORT TERM MEMORY; SKILL; STRAIN DIFFERENCE; TRAINING;

AGENESIS OF CORPUS CALLOSUM; ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HIPPOCAMPUS; LEARNING; LINEAR MODELS; MEMORY DISORDERS; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84875245882     PISSN: 01664328     EISSN: 18727549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.02.021     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Biddle F.G., Eales B.A. Mouse genetic model for left-right paw usage: context, direction, norms of reaction, and memory. Genome 1999, 42:1150-1166.
2. Ribeiro A.S., Eales B.A., Biddle F.G. Learning of paw preference in mice is strain dependent, gradual and based on short-term memory of previous reaches. Animal Behaviour 2011, 81:249-257.
3. Ribeiro A.S., Lloyd-Price J., Eales B.A., Biddle F.G. Dynamic agent-based model of hand-preference behavior patterns in the mouse. Adaptive Behavior 2010, 18:116-131.
4. Biddle F.G., Eales B.A. Hand-preference training in the mouse reveals key elements of its learning and memory process and resolves the phenotypic complexity in the behavior. Genome 2006, 49:666-677.
5. Collins R.L. On the inheritance of pawedness. I. Laterality in inbred mice. Journal of Heredity 1968, 59:9-12.
6. Collins R.L. On the inheritance of pawedness. II. Selection for sinistrality in mice. Journal of Heredity 1969, 60:117-119.
7. Collins R.L. When left-pawed mice live in right-pawed worlds. Science 1975, 187:181-184.
8. Collins R.L. On the inheritance of direction and degree of asymmetry. Cerebral lateralization in nonhuman species 1985, 41-71. Academic Press, Orlando. S.D. Glick (Ed.).
9. Collins R.L. Reimpressed selective breeding for lateralization of pawedness in mice. Brain Research 1991, 564:194-202.
10. Collins R.L., Sargent E.E., Neumann P.E. Genetic and behavioral tests of the McManus hypothesis relating response to selection for lateralization of handedness in mice to degree of heterozygosity. Behavior Genetics 1993, 23:413-421.
11. Roubertoux P.L., Le Roy I., Tordjman S., Cherfou A., Migliore-Samour D. Analysis of quantitative trait loci for behavioral laterality in mice. Genetics 2003, 163:1023-1030.
12. Biddle F.G., Eales B.A. The degree of lateralization of paw usage (pawedness) in the mouse is defined by three major phenotypes. Behavior Genetics 1996, 126:391-406.
13. Biddle F.G., Jones D.A., Eales B. A two-locus model for experience conditioned paw usage in the mouse is suggested by dominant and recessive paw usage behaviours. Genome 2001, 44:872-882.
14. Biddle F.G., Eales B.A. Lateral asymmetry of paw usage: phenotypic survey of constitutive and experience-conditioned paw-usage behaviours among common strains of the mouse. Genome 2001, 44:539-548.
15. Wahlsten D., Metten P., Crabbe J.C. Survey of 21 inbred mouse strains in two laboratories reveals that BTBR T/+ tf/tf has severely reduced hippocampal commissure and absent corpus callosum. Brain Research 2003, 971:47-54.
16. Wahlsten D., Bishop K., Ozaki H. Recombinant inbreeding in mice reveals thresholds in embryonic corpus callosum development. Genes, Brain and Behavior 2006, 5:170-188.
17. Milner B., Squire L.R., Kandel E.R. Cognitive neuroscience and the study of memory. Neuron 1998, 20:445-468.
18. The hippocampus book 2007, Oxford University Press, New York. P. Andersen, R. Morris, D. Amaral, T. Bliss, J. O'Keefe (Eds.).
19. Livy D.J., Schalomon P.M., Roy M., Zacharias M.C., Pimenta J., Lent R., et al. Increased axon number in the anterior commissure of mice lacking a corpus callosum. Experimental Neurology 1997, 146:491-501.
20. Cassels B., Collins R.L., Wahlsten D. Path analysis of sex difference, forebrain commissure area and brain size in relation to degree of laterality in selectively bred mice. Brain Research 1990, 529:50-56.
21. Bulman-Fleming B., Wainwright P.E., Collins R.L. The effects of early experience on callosal development and functional lateralization in pigmented BALB/c mice. Behavioural Brain Research 1992, 50:31-42.
22. Kaprielian Z., Runko E., Imondi R. Axon guidance at the midline choice point. Developmental Dynamics 2001, 221:154-181.
23. Nieto M.A. Molecular biology of axon guidance. Neuron 1996, 17:1039-1048.
24. Richards L.J. Axonal pathfinding mechanisms at the cortical midline and in the development of the corpus callosum. Brazilian Journal of Medicine and Biological Research 2002, 35:1431-1439.
25. Sarnat H.B. Embryology and malformations of the forebrain commissures. Handbook of clinical neurology, vol. 87, malformations of the nervous system 2008, 67-87. Elsevier, Amsterdam. H.B. Sarnat, Curatolo (Eds.).
26. Serur D., Jeret J.S., Wisniewski K. Agenesis of the corpus callosum: clinical, neuroradiological and cytogenetic studies. Neuropediatrics 1988, 19:87-91.
27. Zaidel D.W., Sperry R.W. Memory impairment after commissurotomy in man. Brain 1974, 97:263-273.
28. Phelps E.A., Hirst W., Gazzaniga M.S. Deficits in recall following partial and complete commissurotomy. Cerebral Cortex 1991, 1:492-498.
29. Finlay D.C., Peto T., Payling J., Hunter M., Fulham W.R., Wilkinson I. A study of three cases of familial related agenesis of the corpus callosum. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2000, 22:731-742.
30. Richards L.J., Plachez C., Ren T. Mechanisms regulating the development of the corpus callosum and its agenesis in mouse and human. Clinical Genetics 2004, 66:276-289.
31. Steele-Perkins G., Plachez C., Butz K.G., Yang G.H., Bachurski C.J., Kinsman S.L., et al. The transcription factor gene Nfib is essential for both lung maturation and brain development. Molecular Cell Biology 2005, 25:685-698.
32. Bohlen M.O., Bailoo J.D., Jordan R.L., Wahlsten D. Hippocampal commissure defects in crosses of four inbred mouse strains with absent corpus callosum. Genes, Brain and Behavior 2012, 11:757-766.
33. Schimanski L.A., Wahlsten D., Nguyen P.V. Selective modification of short-term hippocampal synaptic plasticity and impaired memory extinction in mice with a congenitally reduced hippocampal commissure. Journal of Neuroscience 2002, 22:8277-8286.
34. MacPherson P., McGaffigan R., Wahlsten D., Nguyen P. Impaired fear memory, altered object memory and modified hippocampal synaptic plasticity in split-brain mice. Brain Research 2008, 1210:179-188.
35. Takeda S., Endo A. Paw preference in mice; a reappraisal. Physiology and Behavior 1993, 53:727-730.
36. Roediger H.L. Implicit memory: retention without remembering. American Psychologist 1990, 45:1043-1056.
37. Schacter D.L. Implicit memory: history and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1987, 13:501-518.
38. Nissen M.J., Bullemer P. Attentional requirements of learning: evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology 1987, 19:1-32.
39. Ribeiro-Carvalho A., Abreu-Villaca Y., Paes-Branco D., Filgueiras C.C., Manhaes A.C. Novelty affects paw preference performance in adult mice. Animal Behaviour 2010, 80:51-57.
40. Biddle F.G., Coffaro C.M., Ziehr J.E., Eales B.A. Genetic variation in paw preference (handedness) in the mouse. Genome 1993, 36:935-943.
41. Anderson J.L., Albergotti L., Proulx S., Peden C., Huey R.B., Phillips P.C. Thermal preference of Caenorhabditis elegans: a null model and empirical tests. Journal of Experimental Biology 2007, 210:3107-3116.
42. Box G., Jenkins G.M., Reinsel G.C. Time series analysis: forecasting and control 2008, John Wiley, Hoboken. 4th edition.
43. Orfanidis S.J. Optimum signal processing: an introduction 1988, Macmillan, New York.
44. Ward R., Collins R.L. Brain size and shape in strongly and weakly lateralized mice. Brain Research 1985, 328:243-249.
45. McManus I.C., Sik G., Cole D.R., Mellon A.F., Wong J., Kloss J. The development of handedness in children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 1988, 6:257-273.
46. McManus I.C. Right hand left hand. The origins of asymmetry in brains, bodies, atoms and cultures 2002, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
47. Rodriguez A., Kaakinen M., Moilanen I., Taanila A., McGough J.J., Loo S., et al. Mixed-handedness is linked to mental health problems in children and adolescents. Pediatrics 2010, 125:e340-e348.
48. Corballis M.C. Review: the evolution and genetics of cerebral asymmetry. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 2009, 364:867-879.
49. Palmer A.R. Developmental plasticity and the origin of novel forms: unveiling cryptic genetic variation via use and disuse. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Molecular and Developmental Evolution) 2012, 318B:466-479.