Dynamic agent-based model of hand-preference behavior patterns in the mouse

Adaptive Behavior

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 116-131

  Ribeiro, Andre S ^a   Lloyd Price, Jason ^b   Eales, Brenda A ^c   Biddle, Fred G ^c  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Behavior; Hand preference; Population; Probabilistic

Indexed keywords

MUS;

EID: 77951529091     PISSN: 10597123     EISSN: 17412633     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1059712309339859     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Arkin, A.P., Ross, J., & McAdams, H.H. (1998). Stochastic kinetic analysis of developmental pathway bifurcation in phage -infected Escherichia coli cells. Genetics, 149, 1633- 1648.
2. Biddle, F.G., & Eales, B.A. (1996). The degree of lateralization of paw usage (handedness) in the mouse is defined by three major phenotypes. Behavior Genetics, 26, 391-406.
3. Biddle, F.G., & Eales, B.A. (1999). Mouse genetic model for left-right hand usage: context, direction, norms of reaction, and memory. Genome, 42, 1150-1166.
4. Biddle, F.G., & Eales, B.A. (2001). Lateral asymmetry of paw usage: phenotypic survey of constitutive and experience-conditioned paw-usage behaviours among common strains of the mouse. Genome, 44, 539-548.
5. Biddle, F.G., & Eales, B.A. (2006). Hand-preference training in the mouse reveals key elements of its learning and memory process and resolves the phenotypic complexity in the behaviour. Genome, 49, 666-677.
6. Biddle, F.G., Coffaro, C.M., Zeihr, J.E., & Eales, B.A. (1993). Genetic variation in paw preference (handedness) in the mouse. Genome, 36, 935-943.
7. Biddle, F.G., Jones, D.A., & Eales, B.A. (2001). A two-locus model for experience conditioned paw usage in the mouse is suggested by dominant and recessive paw usage behaviours. Genome, 44, 872-882.
8. Bulman-Fleming, B., Wainwright, P.E., & Collins, R.L. (1992). The effects of early experience on callosal development and functional lateralization in pigmented BALB/ c mice. Behavioural Brain Research, 50, 31-42.
9. Collins, R.L. (1968). On the inheritance of handedness. I. Laterality in inbred mice. Journal of Heredity, 59, 9-12.
10. Collins, R.L. (1969). On the inheritance of handedness. II. Selection for sinistrality in mice. Journal of Heredity, 60, 117-119.
11. Collins, R.L. (1975). When left-handed mice live in right-handed worlds. Science, 187, 181-184.
12. Den Nijs, J.C.M., & Sterk, A.A. (1980). Cytogeographical studies of Taraxacum sect. Taraxacum (=sect. Vulgaria) in Central Europe. Botanische Jahrbucher fur Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie, 101, 527- 554.
13. Denenberg, V.H., Sherman, G.F., Schrott, L.M., Rosen, G.D., & Galaburda, A.M. (1991). Spatial learning, discrimination learning, paw preference and neocortical ectopias in two autoimmune strains of mice. Brain Research, 562, 98-114.
14. Denenberg, V.H., Mobraaten, L.E., Sherman, G.F., Morrison, L., Schrott, L.M., Waters, N.S.,et al.(1991). Effects of the autoimmune uterine/maternal environment upon cortical ectopias, behavior and autoimmunity. Brain Research, 563, 114-122.
15. Denenberg, V.H., Sherman, G.F., Morrison, L., Schrott, L.M., Waters, N.S., Rosen, G.D.,et al.(1992). Behavior, ectopias and immunity and BD/DB reciprocal crosses. Brain Research, 571, 323-329.
16. Gillespie, D.T. (1977). Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 81, 2340-2361.
17. Gruber, D., Waanders, R., Collins, R.L., Wolfer, D.P., & Lipp, H.-P. (1991). Weak or missing paw lateralization in a mouse strain (I/LnJ) with congenital absence of the corpus callosum. Behavioural Brain Research, 46, 9-16.
18. Neveu, P.J., Barneoud, P., Vitiello, S., Betancur, C., & Le Moal, M. (1988). Brain modulation of the immune system: association between lymphocyte responsiveness and paw preference in mice. Brain Research, 457, 392-394.
19. Neveu, P.J., Betancur, C., Vitiello, S., & Le Moal, M. (1991). Sex-dependent association between immune function and paw preference in two substrains of C3H mice. Brain Research, 559, 347-351.
20. Samoilov, M.S., Price, G., & Arkin, A.P. (2006). From fluctuations to phenotypes: the physiology of noise. Sci STKE 366: re17.
21. Suel, G., Garcia-Ojalvo, J., Liberman, L., & Elowitz, M.B. (2006). An excitable gene regulatory circuit induces transient cellular differentiation. Nature, 440, 545-550.
22. van Baarlen, P., van Dijk, P.J., Hoekstra, R.F., & de Jong, J.H. (2000). Meiotic recombination in sexual diploid and apomictic triploid dandelions (Taraxacum officinale L.). Genome, 43, 827-835.
23. Takeda, S., & Endo, A. (1993). Paw preference in mice; a reappraisal. Physiology & Behavior, 53, 727-730.
24. Ward, R., Tremblay, L., & Lassonde, M. (1987). The relationship between callosal variation and lateralization in mice is genotype-dependent. Brain Research, 424, 84-88.
25. Warren, J.M. (1980). Handedness and laterality in humans and other animals. Physiological Psychology, 8, 351-359.
26. Yu, J., Xiao, J., Ren, X., Lao, K., & Xie, X.S. (2006). Probing gene expression in live cells, one protein molecule at a time. Science, 311, 1600-1603.