Variables affecting the propensity to buy branded beef among groups of Australian beef buyers

Meat Science

Volumn 94, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 239-246

  Morales, L Emilio ^a   Griffith, Garry ^a,c   Wright, Victor ^a   Fleming, Euan ^a   Umberger, Wendy ^b   Hoang, Nam ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^c Cooperative Research Centre for Beef Genetic Technologies ^*  (Australia)

Author keywords

Branded beef; Consumer preferences; Discrete choice analysis; Logistic regression; Propensity to buy

Indexed keywords

BINARY LOGISTIC MODEL; CONSUMER PREFERENCES; DISCRETE CHOICE ANALYSIS; LOGISTIC REGRESSIONS; POTENTIAL TARGETS; PRODUCT ATTRIBUTES; PRODUCTION PROCESS; PROPENSITY TO BUY;

COMMERCE; HEALTH; LOGISTICS; SALES;

MEATS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CATTLE; COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA; CONSUMER; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; FOOD PACKAGING; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MEAT; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRE; TASTE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANIMALS; AUSTRALIA; CATTLE; COMMERCE; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; FOOD PACKAGING; HUMANS; MALE; MEAT; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES; TASTE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84875233299     PISSN: 03091740     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.02.005     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Belsley D. Assessing the presence of harmful collinearity and other forms of weak data through a test for signal-to-noise. Journal of Econometrics 1982, 20:211-253.
2. Carlsson F., Frykblom P., Liljenstolpe C. Valuing wetland attributes: An application of choice experiments. Ecological Economics 2003, 47(1):95-103.
3. Dahl D., Hammond J. Market and price analysis: The agricultural industries 1977, McGraw-Hill, New York.
4. Daniel W. Biostatistics: A foundation for analysis in the health sciences 1995, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
5. Davidson R., Mackinnon J. Estimation and inference in econometrics 1993, Oxford University Press, New York.
6. Froehlich E., Carlberg J., Ward C. Willingness-to-pay for fresh brand name beef. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 2009, 57:119-137.
7. Glitsch K. Consumer perceptions of fresh meat quality: Cross-national comparison. British Food Journal 2000, 102(3):177-194.
8. Greene W. Econometric analysis 2003, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
9. Grunert K.G., Bredahl L., Brunso K. Consumer perception of meat quality and implications for product development in the meat sector - A review. Journal of Meat Science 2004, 66(2):259-272.
10. Gujarati D. Basic econometrics 2003, McGraw Hill, New York.
11. Hensher D., Rose J., Greene W. The implications on willingness to pay of respondents ignoring specific attributes. Transportation 2005, 32:203-222.
12. Hosmer D., Lemenshow S. Applied logistic regression 2000, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
13. Issanchou S. Consumer expectations and perceptions of meat and meat product quality. Meat Science 1996, 43(S):S5-S19.
14. Kaye-Blake W., Abell W., Zellman E. Respondents' ignoring of attribute information in a choice modelling survey. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 2009, 53(4):547-564.
15. Lancaster K. A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy 1966, 74(2):132-157.
16. Lichtenstein D., Ridgway N., Netemeyer R. Price perceptions and consumer shopping behaviour: A field study. Journal of Marketing Research 1993, 30:234-245.
17. Loureiro M., Umberger W. Estimating consumer willingness-to-pay for country-of-origin labeling. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 2003, 28(2):287-301.
18. Louviere J., Train K., Ben-Akiva M., Bhat C., Brownstone D., Cameron T., Carson R., Deshazo J., Fiebig D., Greene W., Hensher D., Waldman D. Recent progress on endogeneity in choice modeling. Marketing Letters 2005, 16(3-4):255-265.
19. Martinez S., Hanagriff R., Lau M., Harris M. Factors affecting demand for branded beef. Southern agricultural economics association annual meeting 2007, Retrieved 20 Jan 2010 fromhttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/34885/1/sp07ma01.pdf.
20. McFadden D. Economic choices. American Economic Review 2001, 91(3):351-378.
21. Moeller R. Branded beef study 1997, National Cattlemen's Beef Association, Retrieved 4 Dec 2007 fromhttp://www.beef.org/NEWSBrandedBeefStudy-August19972702.aspx.
22. Morales, L.E. (2010). Promoting branded products as innovation in the Australian beef marketing system. Unpublished Doctor of Philosophy Thesis, University of New England, Armidale.
23. Morales L.E., Griffith G., Wright V., Umberger W., Fleming E. Characteristics of different consumer segments in the Australian beef market. Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society (AARES), 53rd Annual Conference 2009, Retrieved 21 Dec 2010 fromhttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/48063/2/Morales.pfd.pdf.
24. Polkinghorne R., Thompson J.M., Watson R., Gee A., Porter M. Evolution of the Meat Standards Australia (MSA) beef grading system. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 2008, 48:1351-1359.
25. Rivers D., Vuong Q. Limited information estimators and exogeneity tests for simultaneous probit models. Journal of Econometrics 1988, 39:347-366.
26. Skaggs R., Menkhaus D., Torok S., Field R. Test marketing of branded, low fat, fresh beef. Agribusiness 1987, 3(3):257-271.
27. Tonsor G.T., Schroeder T.C., Fox J.A., Biere A. European preferences for beef steak attributes. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 2005, 30(2):367-380.
28. Umberger W., Calkins C. Korean consumers' preferences and willingness to pay for domestic versus U.S. and Australian beef with alternative attributes. American agricultural economics association, annual meeting 2008, Retrieved 29 May 2008 fromhttp://agecon.lib.umn.edu/cgi-bin/pdf_view.pl?paperid=29987&ftype=.pdf.
29. Watson R., Polkinghorne R., Thompson J.M. Development of the Meat Standards Australia (MSA) prediction model for beef palatability. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 2008, 48:1368-1379.